社会工作与数字行动主义:#MeToo中的姐妹会、交叉性、同质性和两极分化

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIAL WORK Alternativas Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.14198/altern2021.28.2.09
Joaquín Castillo de Mesa, Chaime Marcuello-Servós, Antonio López Peláez, Paula Méndez Domínguez
{"title":"社会工作与数字行动主义:#MeToo中的姐妹会、交叉性、同质性和两极分化","authors":"Joaquín Castillo de Mesa, Chaime Marcuello-Servós, Antonio López Peláez, Paula Méndez Domínguez","doi":"10.14198/altern2021.28.2.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Social Work is currently facing the significant challenge of dealing with social networking sites – which have become a parallel universe of socialisation – in which ever-increasing digital activism is taking place. The #MeToo movement stands out as a global benchmark. It has established itself as a digital-global feminist movement, fighting harassment and the abuse of women. Methodology. Adopting a social work perspective, a longitudinal analysis was performed of the #MeToo movement on Twitter between 2018-2019 based on social network analysis and netnography, in conjunction with specific algorithms. Results. The results showed significant patterns of sorority, homophily and affective polarisation through the echo chambers and filter bubbles that were identified in the detected Twitter communities. Furthermore, these online communities reflected real offline characteristics (geographical location, affinities, similarities). Discussion and conclusions. The #MeToo movement’s global effect and durability has led to a new understanding of social movements in the digital era. Social workers must not be blind to the exciting digital opportunities arising from digitalisation. They must combat homophily and the polarisation of global society on social networking sites, promoting values oriented towards tolerance of diversity. Practitioners must show awareness and intervene proactively in global digital spheres to understand, reflect and promote social justice, equality of rights and the empowerment of disadvantaged, vulnerable and oppressed people.","PeriodicalId":36594,"journal":{"name":"Alternativas","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Work and Digital Activism: Sorority, Intersectionality, Homophily and Polarisation in #MeToo\",\"authors\":\"Joaquín Castillo de Mesa, Chaime Marcuello-Servós, Antonio López Peláez, Paula Méndez Domínguez\",\"doi\":\"10.14198/altern2021.28.2.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Social Work is currently facing the significant challenge of dealing with social networking sites – which have become a parallel universe of socialisation – in which ever-increasing digital activism is taking place. The #MeToo movement stands out as a global benchmark. It has established itself as a digital-global feminist movement, fighting harassment and the abuse of women. Methodology. Adopting a social work perspective, a longitudinal analysis was performed of the #MeToo movement on Twitter between 2018-2019 based on social network analysis and netnography, in conjunction with specific algorithms. Results. The results showed significant patterns of sorority, homophily and affective polarisation through the echo chambers and filter bubbles that were identified in the detected Twitter communities. Furthermore, these online communities reflected real offline characteristics (geographical location, affinities, similarities). Discussion and conclusions. The #MeToo movement’s global effect and durability has led to a new understanding of social movements in the digital era. Social workers must not be blind to the exciting digital opportunities arising from digitalisation. They must combat homophily and the polarisation of global society on social networking sites, promoting values oriented towards tolerance of diversity. Practitioners must show awareness and intervene proactively in global digital spheres to understand, reflect and promote social justice, equality of rights and the empowerment of disadvantaged, vulnerable and oppressed people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternativas\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternativas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14198/altern2021.28.2.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternativas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/altern2021.28.2.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。社会工作目前正面临着处理社交网站的重大挑战——社交网站已经成为一个社会化的平行宇宙——其中不断增加的数字激进主义正在发生。#MeToo运动作为全球标杆脱颖而出。它已经确立了自己作为一个数字全球女权运动,打击骚扰和虐待妇女。方法。采用社会工作视角,基于社交网络分析和网络学,结合具体算法,对2018-2019年Twitter上的#MeToo运动进行纵向分析。结果。结果显示,在检测到的Twitter社区中,通过回声室和过滤泡,发现了显著的姐妹会、同质性和情感两极分化模式。此外,这些在线社区反映了真实的线下特征(地理位置、亲和力、相似性)。讨论和结论。#MeToo运动的全球影响力和持久性让人们对数字时代的社会运动有了新的认识。社会工作者不能对数字化带来的令人兴奋的数字机会视而不见。他们必须在社交网站上反对同质化和全球社会的两极分化,促进以容忍多样性为导向的价值观。从业者必须在全球数字领域表现出意识并积极干预,以理解、反映和促进社会正义、权利平等以及为弱势群体、弱势群体和被压迫群体赋权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Work and Digital Activism: Sorority, Intersectionality, Homophily and Polarisation in #MeToo
Introduction. Social Work is currently facing the significant challenge of dealing with social networking sites – which have become a parallel universe of socialisation – in which ever-increasing digital activism is taking place. The #MeToo movement stands out as a global benchmark. It has established itself as a digital-global feminist movement, fighting harassment and the abuse of women. Methodology. Adopting a social work perspective, a longitudinal analysis was performed of the #MeToo movement on Twitter between 2018-2019 based on social network analysis and netnography, in conjunction with specific algorithms. Results. The results showed significant patterns of sorority, homophily and affective polarisation through the echo chambers and filter bubbles that were identified in the detected Twitter communities. Furthermore, these online communities reflected real offline characteristics (geographical location, affinities, similarities). Discussion and conclusions. The #MeToo movement’s global effect and durability has led to a new understanding of social movements in the digital era. Social workers must not be blind to the exciting digital opportunities arising from digitalisation. They must combat homophily and the polarisation of global society on social networking sites, promoting values oriented towards tolerance of diversity. Practitioners must show awareness and intervene proactively in global digital spheres to understand, reflect and promote social justice, equality of rights and the empowerment of disadvantaged, vulnerable and oppressed people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alternativas
Alternativas Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
54 weeks
期刊最新文献
El papel de la visualización en el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje del Análisis Matemático Retos de la biología celular en el plan E de la Licenciatura en Ciencias Farmacéuticas Escalada de violencia, motivación y caracterización en Guayaquil Nueva ley de educación superior en el Ecuador: ¿cómo asegurar la calidad? Particularidades del currículo de formación universitaria en el contexto de la América Latina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1