探索游戏作为反思性实践与建构主义理论之间的协同作用

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Play Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/21594937.2023.2209235
A. Long
{"title":"探索游戏作为反思性实践与建构主义理论之间的协同作用","authors":"A. Long","doi":"10.1080/21594937.2023.2209235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE. (p. 344) suggests that ‘a reflexive stance informs how the researcher conducts his or her research, relates to the research participants and represents them in written reports’. As playworkers, we position ourselves outside of children’s play, as observers looking in, often, though not always, trying to make sense of what we observe. How we interpret children’s play, our interventions and those of our peers and colleagues, is influenced by our own lived experiences, our biographies and the history we bring to the play setting. This article explores the place of reflexivity in playwork and proposes that when researching children’s play from a playwork perspective a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach responds to some of the unique characteristics of playwork and the ambiguity of children’s play.","PeriodicalId":52149,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Play","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring synergies between playwork as reflexive practice and constructivist grounded theory\",\"authors\":\"A. Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21594937.2023.2209235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE. (p. 344) suggests that ‘a reflexive stance informs how the researcher conducts his or her research, relates to the research participants and represents them in written reports’. As playworkers, we position ourselves outside of children’s play, as observers looking in, often, though not always, trying to make sense of what we observe. How we interpret children’s play, our interventions and those of our peers and colleagues, is influenced by our own lived experiences, our biographies and the history we bring to the play setting. This article explores the place of reflexivity in playwork and proposes that when researching children’s play from a playwork perspective a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach responds to some of the unique characteristics of playwork and the ambiguity of children’s play.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Play\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Play\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2023.2209235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Play","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2023.2209235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[摘要]王晓明(2014)。构建扎根理论(第2版)。圣人。(第344页)表明,“反射性立场决定了研究人员如何进行他或她的研究,如何与研究参与者建立联系,并在书面报告中代表他们”。作为游戏工作者,我们把自己置身于孩子们的游戏之外,作为观察者,我们经常(尽管并非总是)试图理解我们所观察到的东西。我们如何解读孩子的游戏,我们的干预以及我们的同伴和同事的干预,受到我们自己的生活经历,我们的传记和我们带入游戏环境的历史的影响。本文探讨了反身性在游戏中的地位,并提出从游戏角度研究儿童游戏时,建构主义扎根理论的方法回应了游戏的一些独特特征和儿童游戏的模糊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring synergies between playwork as reflexive practice and constructivist grounded theory
ABSTRACT Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE. (p. 344) suggests that ‘a reflexive stance informs how the researcher conducts his or her research, relates to the research participants and represents them in written reports’. As playworkers, we position ourselves outside of children’s play, as observers looking in, often, though not always, trying to make sense of what we observe. How we interpret children’s play, our interventions and those of our peers and colleagues, is influenced by our own lived experiences, our biographies and the history we bring to the play setting. This article explores the place of reflexivity in playwork and proposes that when researching children’s play from a playwork perspective a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach responds to some of the unique characteristics of playwork and the ambiguity of children’s play.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Play
International Journal of Play Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Play is an inter-disciplinary publication focusing on all facets of play. It aims to provide an international forum for mono- and multi-disciplinary papers and scholarly debate on all aspects of play theory, policy and practice from across the globe and across the lifespan, and in all kinds of cultural settings, institutions and communities. The journal will be of interest to anthropologists, educationalists, folklorists, historians, linguists, philosophers, playworkers, psychologists, sociologists, therapists and zoologists.
期刊最新文献
The ambiguity of the freedom and purpose of play in modern German philosophy My secret summer retreat Play and paradigm – TAASP keynote address, April 1977 Engagement in risky play: critical ecosystemic factors from parents’ perspective Play à la mode
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1