自由现金流、管理层所有权和代理成本:来自尼日利亚消费品和工业品上市公司的非线性证据

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1142/s2737566821500110
Jibril Ibrahim Yero, Nuhu Abubakar, Aisha Muhamud Hamman, Sani Saidu
{"title":"自由现金流、管理层所有权和代理成本:来自尼日利亚消费品和工业品上市公司的非线性证据","authors":"Jibril Ibrahim Yero, Nuhu Abubakar, Aisha Muhamud Hamman, Sani Saidu","doi":"10.1142/s2737566821500110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on a nonlinear approach in assessing the effect of free cash flow and managerial ownership on the agency cost of firms listed under the Consumer and Industrial Goods sector in the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE). Based on the extant theories, firms with high free cash flow are more exposed to agency costs. Existing literature however shows that managerial ownership could moderate this tendency. In this study, we argue that the extent to which managerial ownership moderates the effect of free cash flow on firms’ agency costs is dependent upon the level of the ownership, and thus, the moderation effect is not entirely linear. The study therefore empirically investigates whether free cash flow has a significant positive effect on agency costs; whether managerial ownership has a nonlinear effect on free cash flow; and whether the moderating effect of managerial ownership on the association of free cash flow and agency costs is nonlinear (not the same at different levels [Formula: see text]25% and above 25%). We estimate the panel regression using data from 2009 to 2015 to test three main hypotheses. We measured free cash flow using the cash flow approach and adopted the inverse of asset utilization to proxy for agency costs. The findings reveal that while free cash flow linearly and negatively affects agency costs, managerial ownership has a nonlinear effect on free cash flow and on the effect of free cash flow on agency costs. In line with the findings, this study concludes that managerial ownership is not a straight jacket remedy for tacking problems associated with agency costs that results from having excess free cash flow. Further studies should consider other proxies of agency costs.","PeriodicalId":39482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis","volume":"205 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FREE CASH FLOW, MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP, AND AGENCY COST: A NONLINEAR EVIDENCE FROM NIGERIAN QUOTED CONSUMER AND INDUSTRIAL GOODS FIRMS\",\"authors\":\"Jibril Ibrahim Yero, Nuhu Abubakar, Aisha Muhamud Hamman, Sani Saidu\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2737566821500110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on a nonlinear approach in assessing the effect of free cash flow and managerial ownership on the agency cost of firms listed under the Consumer and Industrial Goods sector in the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE). Based on the extant theories, firms with high free cash flow are more exposed to agency costs. Existing literature however shows that managerial ownership could moderate this tendency. In this study, we argue that the extent to which managerial ownership moderates the effect of free cash flow on firms’ agency costs is dependent upon the level of the ownership, and thus, the moderation effect is not entirely linear. The study therefore empirically investigates whether free cash flow has a significant positive effect on agency costs; whether managerial ownership has a nonlinear effect on free cash flow; and whether the moderating effect of managerial ownership on the association of free cash flow and agency costs is nonlinear (not the same at different levels [Formula: see text]25% and above 25%). We estimate the panel regression using data from 2009 to 2015 to test three main hypotheses. We measured free cash flow using the cash flow approach and adopted the inverse of asset utilization to proxy for agency costs. The findings reveal that while free cash flow linearly and negatively affects agency costs, managerial ownership has a nonlinear effect on free cash flow and on the effect of free cash flow on agency costs. In line with the findings, this study concludes that managerial ownership is not a straight jacket remedy for tacking problems associated with agency costs that results from having excess free cash flow. Further studies should consider other proxies of agency costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737566821500110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737566821500110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究侧重于评估自由现金流和管理层所有权对尼日利亚证券交易所(NSE)消费品和工业产品部门上市公司代理成本的影响的非线性方法。根据现有理论,自由现金流高的企业更容易受到代理成本的影响。然而,现有文献表明,管理层所有权可以缓和这种趋势。在本研究中,我们认为管理层持股对自由现金流对企业代理成本影响的调节程度取决于管理层持股水平,因此,这种调节作用并不完全是线性的。因此,本研究实证考察了自由现金流对代理成本是否具有显著的正向影响;管理层持股对自由现金流是否有非线性影响;管理层所有权对自由现金流和代理成本关联的调节作用是否是非线性的(在不同层次上不相同[公式:见文本]25%和25%以上)。我们使用2009年至2015年的数据估计面板回归,以检验三个主要假设。我们使用现金流方法测量自由现金流,并采用资产利用率的逆来代替代理成本。研究结果表明,自由现金流对代理成本具有线性和负向影响,而管理层所有权对自由现金流和自由现金流对代理成本的影响具有非线性影响。与研究结果一致,本研究得出的结论是,管理所有权并不是解决因自由现金流过多而导致的代理成本相关问题的直接补救措施。进一步的研究应考虑代理成本的其他代理指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FREE CASH FLOW, MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP, AND AGENCY COST: A NONLINEAR EVIDENCE FROM NIGERIAN QUOTED CONSUMER AND INDUSTRIAL GOODS FIRMS
This study focuses on a nonlinear approach in assessing the effect of free cash flow and managerial ownership on the agency cost of firms listed under the Consumer and Industrial Goods sector in the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE). Based on the extant theories, firms with high free cash flow are more exposed to agency costs. Existing literature however shows that managerial ownership could moderate this tendency. In this study, we argue that the extent to which managerial ownership moderates the effect of free cash flow on firms’ agency costs is dependent upon the level of the ownership, and thus, the moderation effect is not entirely linear. The study therefore empirically investigates whether free cash flow has a significant positive effect on agency costs; whether managerial ownership has a nonlinear effect on free cash flow; and whether the moderating effect of managerial ownership on the association of free cash flow and agency costs is nonlinear (not the same at different levels [Formula: see text]25% and above 25%). We estimate the panel regression using data from 2009 to 2015 to test three main hypotheses. We measured free cash flow using the cash flow approach and adopted the inverse of asset utilization to proxy for agency costs. The findings reveal that while free cash flow linearly and negatively affects agency costs, managerial ownership has a nonlinear effect on free cash flow and on the effect of free cash flow on agency costs. In line with the findings, this study concludes that managerial ownership is not a straight jacket remedy for tacking problems associated with agency costs that results from having excess free cash flow. Further studies should consider other proxies of agency costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis
Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis (JBVELA) is a refereed academic journal that publishes continuously throughout the year and is co-edited by Bradley Ewing and James Hoffman. The mission of the Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis is to improve the practice of business valuation, economic loss analysis, and risk management by helping to inform academics, practitioners, and attorneys about theoretical and practical developments in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Consistent DCF Methods for Constant-Growth Annuities à la Modigliani & Miller or Miles & Ezzell Central Bank Independence and Economic Growth: Evidence from ASEAN Countries HIERARCHICAL EFFECTS OF PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSES AND FISCAL POLICY MEASURES ON TAX MORALE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL FIRMS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN NIGERIA Urban Population and CO2 Emission on GDP Per Capita: ASEAN Countries Product Development and Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Visual Branding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1