超越种族奖学金的开创性/无关性

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Departures in Critical Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.2.122

Jenna N. Hanchey

{"title":"超越种族奖学金的开创性/无关性","authors":"Jenna N. Hanchey","doi":"10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.2.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This introduction situates the 2019 National Communication Association Organizational Communication Division's Top Paper Panel walkout within a larger subdisciplinary history of erasing scholarship on racism, colonialism, as well as queer and trans* studies. I describe how such scholarship is labeled either groundbreaking or irrelevant—thereby relegating it to outside of the typical or expected domain of organizational communication.","PeriodicalId":36478,"journal":{"name":"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"122-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Race Scholarship as Groundbreaking/Irrelevant\",\"authors\":\"Jenna N. Hanchey\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.2.122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This introduction situates the 2019 National Communication Association Organizational Communication Division's Top Paper Panel walkout within a larger subdisciplinary history of erasing scholarship on racism, colonialism, as well as queer and trans* studies. I describe how such scholarship is labeled either groundbreaking or irrelevant—thereby relegating it to outside of the typical or expected domain of organizational communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"122-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.2.122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Departures in Critical Qualitative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.2.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

这篇介绍将2019年美国国家传播协会组织传播部门的顶级论文小组罢工置于一个更大的子学科历史中，该历史抹掉了关于种族主义、殖民主义以及酷儿和跨性别研究的学术研究。我描述了这种学术是如何被贴上开创性或无关紧要的标签的——从而将其降级到典型或预期的组织沟通领域之外。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Beyond Race Scholarship as Groundbreaking/Irrelevant

This introduction situates the 2019 National Communication Association Organizational Communication Division's Top Paper Panel walkout within a larger subdisciplinary history of erasing scholarship on racism, colonialism, as well as queer and trans* studies. I describe how such scholarship is labeled either groundbreaking or irrelevant—thereby relegating it to outside of the typical or expected domain of organizational communication.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊