斯坦齐克的作品集:对克拉科夫保守党的反思和/或计划

Larisa M. Arzhakova
{"title":"斯坦齐克的作品集:对克拉科夫保守党的反思和/或计划","authors":"Larisa M. Arzhakova","doi":"10.31168/2619-0877.2020.3.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the problem associated with the famous pamphlet “Stańczyk’s Portfolio” published in 1869 by the so called Cracow conservatives, including the founder of the Cracow historical school, Józef Szujski. Firstly, the context in which the idea of the pamphlet was born and developed is considered. Special attention is paid to the comparison of fundamentally important terms — loyalism and “ugoda” (reconciliation), which are used in Polish and Russian scientific literature when talking about the attitude of Polish society to the power of the Austrian Emperor or the Tsar. The author believes that these terms cannot be considered identical. The author of the article describes the success of Polish historians in studying the history of Polish conservatism; in particular, the activities of the Cracow conservatives during the period of Galician autonomy. The article also describes the lag in Russian historiography in the study of Polish (Cracow) conservatism and such important sources as “Stańczyk’s Portfolio”. This landmark work not only conveys the atmosphere in which Polish society found itself after the defeat of the 1863 insurrection, reflecting on the fate of the Fatherland in the past and present, but also contains the ideological postulates of the Cracow conservatives, which makes it possible to perceive the pamphlet not only as a reflection, but also as a political program of the Cracow conservatives. Considering the pamphlet as a socio-cultural monument, the author emphasizes the prospects for its study using interdisciplinary methods of historical and anthropological research.","PeriodicalId":30305,"journal":{"name":"Central European Political Studies Review","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stanczyk’s Portfolio: Reflection and/or Pprogram of the Cracow Conservatives\",\"authors\":\"Larisa M. Arzhakova\",\"doi\":\"10.31168/2619-0877.2020.3.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is devoted to the problem associated with the famous pamphlet “Stańczyk’s Portfolio” published in 1869 by the so called Cracow conservatives, including the founder of the Cracow historical school, Józef Szujski. Firstly, the context in which the idea of the pamphlet was born and developed is considered. Special attention is paid to the comparison of fundamentally important terms — loyalism and “ugoda” (reconciliation), which are used in Polish and Russian scientific literature when talking about the attitude of Polish society to the power of the Austrian Emperor or the Tsar. The author believes that these terms cannot be considered identical. The author of the article describes the success of Polish historians in studying the history of Polish conservatism; in particular, the activities of the Cracow conservatives during the period of Galician autonomy. The article also describes the lag in Russian historiography in the study of Polish (Cracow) conservatism and such important sources as “Stańczyk’s Portfolio”. This landmark work not only conveys the atmosphere in which Polish society found itself after the defeat of the 1863 insurrection, reflecting on the fate of the Fatherland in the past and present, but also contains the ideological postulates of the Cracow conservatives, which makes it possible to perceive the pamphlet not only as a reflection, but also as a political program of the Cracow conservatives. Considering the pamphlet as a socio-cultural monument, the author emphasizes the prospects for its study using interdisciplinary methods of historical and anthropological research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Political Studies Review\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Political Studies Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31168/2619-0877.2020.3.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Political Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31168/2619-0877.2020.3.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章专门讨论与著名的小册子“Stańczyk’s Portfolio”有关的问题,这本小册子是由所谓的克拉科夫保守派于1869年出版的,其中包括克拉科夫历史学派的创始人Józef Szujski。首先,考虑了小册子的思想产生和发展的背景。特别要注意的是,在波兰和俄罗斯的科学文献中,当谈到波兰社会对奥地利皇帝或沙皇的权力的态度时,对重要的基本术语-忠诚和“ugoda”(和解)的比较。作者认为,这些术语不能被认为是相同的。文章的作者描述了波兰历史学家在研究波兰保守主义历史方面的成功;特别是克拉科夫保守派在加利西亚自治时期的活动。文章还描述了俄罗斯史学在研究波兰(克拉科夫)保守主义方面的滞后,以及“Stańczyk’s Portfolio”等重要资料来源。这部具有里程碑意义的作品不仅传达了波兰社会在1863年起义失败后发现自己的氛围,反映了过去和现在的祖国命运,而且还包含了克拉科夫保守派的意识形态假设,这使得人们有可能将这本小册子不仅视为反映,而且视为克拉科夫保守派的政治纲领。考虑到这本小册子是一个社会文化的纪念碑,作者强调了用历史和人类学研究的跨学科方法来研究它的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stanczyk’s Portfolio: Reflection and/or Pprogram of the Cracow Conservatives
This article is devoted to the problem associated with the famous pamphlet “Stańczyk’s Portfolio” published in 1869 by the so called Cracow conservatives, including the founder of the Cracow historical school, Józef Szujski. Firstly, the context in which the idea of the pamphlet was born and developed is considered. Special attention is paid to the comparison of fundamentally important terms — loyalism and “ugoda” (reconciliation), which are used in Polish and Russian scientific literature when talking about the attitude of Polish society to the power of the Austrian Emperor or the Tsar. The author believes that these terms cannot be considered identical. The author of the article describes the success of Polish historians in studying the history of Polish conservatism; in particular, the activities of the Cracow conservatives during the period of Galician autonomy. The article also describes the lag in Russian historiography in the study of Polish (Cracow) conservatism and such important sources as “Stańczyk’s Portfolio”. This landmark work not only conveys the atmosphere in which Polish society found itself after the defeat of the 1863 insurrection, reflecting on the fate of the Fatherland in the past and present, but also contains the ideological postulates of the Cracow conservatives, which makes it possible to perceive the pamphlet not only as a reflection, but also as a political program of the Cracow conservatives. Considering the pamphlet as a socio-cultural monument, the author emphasizes the prospects for its study using interdisciplinary methods of historical and anthropological research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Women’s Organizations in Belgrade from the Last Quarter of the Nineteenth to the Early Twentieth Centuries A Perfect Monarch: The Image of Francis Joseph I in Textbooks for Habsburg Schools The Image of Power in the Past and Present in the Writings of Jozef Szujski The Birthday of the Party Leader: Klement Gottwald’s Image on the Pages of the “Rudé Právo” Newspaper The Ice-Regime of the Danube and Winter Crossing Over Rivers in the Early Modern Times (1529–1650)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1