唑来膦酸治疗多发性骨髓瘤的长期疗效及毒性分析

A. Avilés
{"title":"唑来膦酸治疗多发性骨髓瘤的长期疗效及毒性分析","authors":"A. Avilés","doi":"10.31579/2693-4779/124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Myeloma bone disease MBD) is the most common and dangerous effects in patients with multiple myeloma. Bisphosphonates (BP), are the treatment of choice. But efficacy and adverse events has not been evaluated at longer follow-up. Thus, we review our experience in a tertiary cancer center, whose received zoledronic acid (ZO): in a large number of cases (1041) and longer follow-up: 4.2 to 21.6 years (median 13.8).Skeletal event (SE) were statistically better in patients who received ZA : 52 events :8.96%,compared to 207 (42.6) p < 0.001 in patients whose did not received ZA, independently if the patients received autologous stem cell transplant or not. But progression free survival and overall survival did not show any benefit. Adverse events were minimal, and jaw necrosis were not observed. Thus, we considered that ZA, remain to be the best treatment of MBD, but we confirm that ZA did not show at longer follow-up any antitumor effect.","PeriodicalId":8525,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Analysis of Efficacy and Toxicidad of Zoledroinic Acid in Patients with Multiple Myeloma\",\"authors\":\"A. Avilés\",\"doi\":\"10.31579/2693-4779/124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Myeloma bone disease MBD) is the most common and dangerous effects in patients with multiple myeloma. Bisphosphonates (BP), are the treatment of choice. But efficacy and adverse events has not been evaluated at longer follow-up. Thus, we review our experience in a tertiary cancer center, whose received zoledronic acid (ZO): in a large number of cases (1041) and longer follow-up: 4.2 to 21.6 years (median 13.8).Skeletal event (SE) were statistically better in patients who received ZA : 52 events :8.96%,compared to 207 (42.6) p < 0.001 in patients whose did not received ZA, independently if the patients received autologous stem cell transplant or not. But progression free survival and overall survival did not show any benefit. Adverse events were minimal, and jaw necrosis were not observed. Thus, we considered that ZA, remain to be the best treatment of MBD, but we confirm that ZA did not show at longer follow-up any antitumor effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨髓瘤骨病(MBD)是多发性骨髓瘤患者最常见和最危险的影响。双膦酸盐(BP)是治疗的首选。但疗效和不良事件尚未在长期随访中评估。因此,我们回顾了我们在一个三级癌症中心的经验,该中心接受了唑来膦酸(ZO):在大量病例(1041)和较长的随访中:4.2至21.6年(中位13.8)。无论患者是否接受自体干细胞移植,接受ZA的患者的骨骼事件(SE)在统计学上更好:52个事件:8.96%,而未接受ZA的患者为207个(42.6个)p < 0.001。但是无进展生存期和总生存期没有显示出任何益处。不良事件极少,未观察到颌骨坏死。因此,我们认为ZA仍然是MBD的最佳治疗方法,但我们确认ZA在更长时间的随访中没有表现出任何抗肿瘤作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-Term Analysis of Efficacy and Toxicidad of Zoledroinic Acid in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
Myeloma bone disease MBD) is the most common and dangerous effects in patients with multiple myeloma. Bisphosphonates (BP), are the treatment of choice. But efficacy and adverse events has not been evaluated at longer follow-up. Thus, we review our experience in a tertiary cancer center, whose received zoledronic acid (ZO): in a large number of cases (1041) and longer follow-up: 4.2 to 21.6 years (median 13.8).Skeletal event (SE) were statistically better in patients who received ZA : 52 events :8.96%,compared to 207 (42.6) p < 0.001 in patients whose did not received ZA, independently if the patients received autologous stem cell transplant or not. But progression free survival and overall survival did not show any benefit. Adverse events were minimal, and jaw necrosis were not observed. Thus, we considered that ZA, remain to be the best treatment of MBD, but we confirm that ZA did not show at longer follow-up any antitumor effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Analysis of Efficacy and Toxicidad of Zoledroinic Acid in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Baseline Assessments of Tb Detection Centres in Selected Public and Private Laboratories in India and Need for Introducing Quality Management Systems An Uncommon Cause of Palpitations Prevalence and Correlates of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (Cam) Use Among Hypertensive Patients in Tamale, Ghana Electroacupuncture in The Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1