开环装配公差分析方法的比较

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Advances in Production Engineering & Management Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI:10.14743/apem2020.1.348
P. Kosec, S. Škec, D. Miler
{"title":"开环装配公差分析方法的比较","authors":"P. Kosec, S. Škec, D. Miler","doi":"10.14743/apem2020.1.348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dimensional and geometric tolerances affect both the cost and the functionali‐ ty of a given product. Finding the acceptable trade‐off between the two is among the common engineering tasks. Thus, many tolerance analysis meth‐ ods are developed to help engineers and assist in the decision‐making pro‐ cess. In this article, the authors have assessed four tolerance analysis methods by applying them to the open‐loop assembly. The results obtained by the tolerance chart (worst‐case) method, Monte‐Carlo simulation, vector‐loop analysis, and the Unified Jacobian‐torsor model were analysed and compared. Additionally, the overview and application guidelines are included for each of the methods, aiming to help both researchers and practitioners. The results have confirmed that there are significant variations in the outputs across the observed methods, implying the need for informed method selection. © 2020 CPE, University of Maribor. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":48763,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Production Engineering & Management","volume":"421 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the tolerance analysis methods in the open-loop assembly\",\"authors\":\"P. Kosec, S. Škec, D. Miler\",\"doi\":\"10.14743/apem2020.1.348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dimensional and geometric tolerances affect both the cost and the functionali‐ ty of a given product. Finding the acceptable trade‐off between the two is among the common engineering tasks. Thus, many tolerance analysis meth‐ ods are developed to help engineers and assist in the decision‐making pro‐ cess. In this article, the authors have assessed four tolerance analysis methods by applying them to the open‐loop assembly. The results obtained by the tolerance chart (worst‐case) method, Monte‐Carlo simulation, vector‐loop analysis, and the Unified Jacobian‐torsor model were analysed and compared. Additionally, the overview and application guidelines are included for each of the methods, aiming to help both researchers and practitioners. The results have confirmed that there are significant variations in the outputs across the observed methods, implying the need for informed method selection. © 2020 CPE, University of Maribor. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Production Engineering & Management\",\"volume\":\"421 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Production Engineering & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.1.348\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Production Engineering & Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.1.348","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

尺寸和几何公差影响给定产品的成本和功能。在两者之间找到可接受的折衷是常见的工程任务之一。因此,开发了许多公差分析方法来帮助工程师并协助决策过程。在本文中,作者评估了四种公差分析方法,并将它们应用于开环装配。分析比较了公差图(最坏情况)法、蒙特卡罗模拟、矢量环分析和统一雅可比-托子模型的结果。此外,还包括每种方法的概述和应用指南,旨在帮助研究人员和实践者。结果证实,在观察到的方法中,输出存在显着差异,这意味着需要明智的方法选择。©2020 CPE,马里博尔大学。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of the tolerance analysis methods in the open-loop assembly
Dimensional and geometric tolerances affect both the cost and the functionali‐ ty of a given product. Finding the acceptable trade‐off between the two is among the common engineering tasks. Thus, many tolerance analysis meth‐ ods are developed to help engineers and assist in the decision‐making pro‐ cess. In this article, the authors have assessed four tolerance analysis methods by applying them to the open‐loop assembly. The results obtained by the tolerance chart (worst‐case) method, Monte‐Carlo simulation, vector‐loop analysis, and the Unified Jacobian‐torsor model were analysed and compared. Additionally, the overview and application guidelines are included for each of the methods, aiming to help both researchers and practitioners. The results have confirmed that there are significant variations in the outputs across the observed methods, implying the need for informed method selection. © 2020 CPE, University of Maribor. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Production Engineering & Management
Advances in Production Engineering & Management ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURINGMATERIALS SCIENC-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
22.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Advances in Production Engineering & Management (APEM journal) is an interdisciplinary international academic journal published quarterly. The main goal of the APEM journal is to present original, high quality, theoretical and application-oriented research developments in all areas of production engineering and production management to a broad audience of academics and practitioners. In order to bridge the gap between theory and practice, applications based on advanced theory and case studies are particularly welcome. For theoretical papers, their originality and research contributions are the main factors in the evaluation process. General approaches, formalisms, algorithms or techniques should be illustrated with significant applications that demonstrate their applicability to real-world problems. Please note the APEM journal is not intended especially for studying problems in the finance, economics, business, and bank sectors even though the methodology in the paper is quality/project management oriented. Therefore, the papers should include a substantial level of engineering issues in the field of manufacturing engineering.
期刊最新文献
Optimal path planning of a disinfection mobile robot against COVID-19 in a ROS-based research platform A comparative study of different pull control strategies in multi-product manufacturing systems using discrete event simulation The impact of the collaborative workplace on the production system capacity: Simulation modelling vs. real-world application approach Molecular-dynamics study of multi-pulsed ultrafast laser interaction with copper A deep learning-based worker assistance system for error prevention: Case study in a real-world manual assembly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1