外科医生的触摸:手术手套粉对包膜挛缩形成的影响

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/tjps.tjps_6_23
S. Alpat, B. Kaya, Cem Çerkez, K. Kosemehmetoglu, S. Serel, S. Gultan
{"title":"外科医生的触摸:手术手套粉对包膜挛缩形成的影响","authors":"S. Alpat, B. Kaya, Cem Çerkez, K. Kosemehmetoglu, S. Serel, S. Gultan","doi":"10.4103/tjps.tjps_6_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Esthetic and reconstructive surgery routinely employs the utilization of silicone implants. Silicone's limited biocompatibility can lead to serious side effects, such as capsular contracture. A capsule forming around the implant is an inflammatory response to the presence of a foreign material; however, the precise cause of capsular contracture is unknown. This experimental study looks into the effects of the two most widely used powders in surgical gloves-talcum and cornstarch-on capsule formation. Materials and Methods: Three circular silicone implants, each 1.5 cm in diameter and 2 mm thick, were implanted into pockets developed on the dorsums of 12 female rats, which were then randomly assigned to one of three groups. Group 1 received no powder in their implant pockets; Group 2 received 1.5 mg of talcum powder; and Group 3 received 1.5 mg of cornstarch powder. The capsules around the implants were histopathologically evaluated, their thicknesses were measured, and overall scores were determined after 4 weeks. Results: Although there were no statistically significant differences in the average capsule thickness measured across all four quadrants (P = 0.368), there were significant differences in the capsule score distributions across the control, talcum, and cornstarch groups (P = 0.026). Conclusion: The results of the study projects that powdered gloves (talc or cornstarch) contribute to exacerbated capsular inflammation forming around silicone implants. Therefore, powder-free gloves would be highly recommended during breast augmentation and reconstruction surgeries while handling implants.","PeriodicalId":42065,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The surgeon's touch: Impact of surgical glove powder on the formation of capsular contracture\",\"authors\":\"S. Alpat, B. Kaya, Cem Çerkez, K. Kosemehmetoglu, S. Serel, S. Gultan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tjps.tjps_6_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Esthetic and reconstructive surgery routinely employs the utilization of silicone implants. Silicone's limited biocompatibility can lead to serious side effects, such as capsular contracture. A capsule forming around the implant is an inflammatory response to the presence of a foreign material; however, the precise cause of capsular contracture is unknown. This experimental study looks into the effects of the two most widely used powders in surgical gloves-talcum and cornstarch-on capsule formation. Materials and Methods: Three circular silicone implants, each 1.5 cm in diameter and 2 mm thick, were implanted into pockets developed on the dorsums of 12 female rats, which were then randomly assigned to one of three groups. Group 1 received no powder in their implant pockets; Group 2 received 1.5 mg of talcum powder; and Group 3 received 1.5 mg of cornstarch powder. The capsules around the implants were histopathologically evaluated, their thicknesses were measured, and overall scores were determined after 4 weeks. Results: Although there were no statistically significant differences in the average capsule thickness measured across all four quadrants (P = 0.368), there were significant differences in the capsule score distributions across the control, talcum, and cornstarch groups (P = 0.026). Conclusion: The results of the study projects that powdered gloves (talc or cornstarch) contribute to exacerbated capsular inflammation forming around silicone implants. Therefore, powder-free gloves would be highly recommended during breast augmentation and reconstruction surgeries while handling implants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjps.tjps_6_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjps.tjps_6_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美容和重建手术通常使用硅胶植入物。硅胶有限的生物相容性会导致严重的副作用,如包膜挛缩。在植入物周围形成的囊是对外来物质存在的炎症反应;然而,包膜挛缩的确切原因尚不清楚。本实验研究探讨了手术手套中最广泛使用的两种粉末——滑石粉和玉米淀粉——对胶囊形成的影响。材料与方法:将3个直径为1.5 cm、厚度为2mm的圆形硅胶植入12只雌性大鼠背部发育的口袋中,随机分为3组。组1种植体囊内不含粉末;2组给予滑石粉1.5 mg;第三组给予玉米淀粉粉1.5 mg。对种植体周围的胶囊进行组织病理学评估,测量其厚度,并在4周后确定总体评分。结果:虽然四个象限测量的平均胶囊厚度没有统计学差异(P = 0.368),但对照组、滑石粉组和玉米淀粉组的胶囊评分分布有统计学差异(P = 0.026)。结论:研究结果表明,粉手套(滑石粉或玉米淀粉)有助于加剧硅胶植入物周围囊膜的炎症形成。因此,在隆胸和再造手术中,在处理植入物时,强烈建议使用无粉手套。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The surgeon's touch: Impact of surgical glove powder on the formation of capsular contracture
Background: Esthetic and reconstructive surgery routinely employs the utilization of silicone implants. Silicone's limited biocompatibility can lead to serious side effects, such as capsular contracture. A capsule forming around the implant is an inflammatory response to the presence of a foreign material; however, the precise cause of capsular contracture is unknown. This experimental study looks into the effects of the two most widely used powders in surgical gloves-talcum and cornstarch-on capsule formation. Materials and Methods: Three circular silicone implants, each 1.5 cm in diameter and 2 mm thick, were implanted into pockets developed on the dorsums of 12 female rats, which were then randomly assigned to one of three groups. Group 1 received no powder in their implant pockets; Group 2 received 1.5 mg of talcum powder; and Group 3 received 1.5 mg of cornstarch powder. The capsules around the implants were histopathologically evaluated, their thicknesses were measured, and overall scores were determined after 4 weeks. Results: Although there were no statistically significant differences in the average capsule thickness measured across all four quadrants (P = 0.368), there were significant differences in the capsule score distributions across the control, talcum, and cornstarch groups (P = 0.026). Conclusion: The results of the study projects that powdered gloves (talc or cornstarch) contribute to exacerbated capsular inflammation forming around silicone implants. Therefore, powder-free gloves would be highly recommended during breast augmentation and reconstruction surgeries while handling implants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Glomus tumors of the digit: A retrospective analysis of clinical and functional outcomes The effect of deferoxamine on fat graft survival in tamoxifen use: An experimental study Nasal reconstruction in a rare case of unilateral arhinia in bosma arhinia microphthalmia syndrome A complication after radiofrequency ablation: Skin necrosis Comparative analysis of speech outcomes in the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency: Traditional superior-based pharyngeal flap and pharyngeal flap combined with radical intravelar veloplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1