Kármán和混凝土材料模型的发展

A. Windisch
{"title":"Kármán和混凝土材料模型的发展","authors":"A. Windisch","doi":"10.32970/CS.2019.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The failure models developed until the 1960ies were defined by the testing equipment: the triaxial loading cell which was developed at the beginning of the last century by Karman. The axial loading was performed with a solid loading plate, the central-symmetric transverse loading through hydraulic pressure. Therefore, the characterization of the failure surface with the hydrostatic normal stress and octahedral shear stress without any reference to deformations was a logical consequence. In 1963 Hilsdorf proposed a brush-type loading equipment. Using brushes Kupfer carried out his wellknown biaxial loading tests which made possible the characterization of concrete strength by means of the principal stresses. In 1977 Ottosen applied in his model for multiaxial strength of concrete the stress invariants. The same did CEB in the Bulletin d’Information N°. 156. Van Mier (1984) applied brushes and proposed a 3D-type representation using contour lines. The MC2010 returned to the Ottosen model and declared concrete as frictional material. Using the principal stresses, a new, transparent (and physically really sound) form of representation of the failure surface showing the strength increase due to bi- and triaxial loading is presented.","PeriodicalId":87278,"journal":{"name":"International journal of concrete structures & materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kármán and the development of the material models of concrete\",\"authors\":\"A. Windisch\",\"doi\":\"10.32970/CS.2019.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The failure models developed until the 1960ies were defined by the testing equipment: the triaxial loading cell which was developed at the beginning of the last century by Karman. The axial loading was performed with a solid loading plate, the central-symmetric transverse loading through hydraulic pressure. Therefore, the characterization of the failure surface with the hydrostatic normal stress and octahedral shear stress without any reference to deformations was a logical consequence. In 1963 Hilsdorf proposed a brush-type loading equipment. Using brushes Kupfer carried out his wellknown biaxial loading tests which made possible the characterization of concrete strength by means of the principal stresses. In 1977 Ottosen applied in his model for multiaxial strength of concrete the stress invariants. The same did CEB in the Bulletin d’Information N°. 156. Van Mier (1984) applied brushes and proposed a 3D-type representation using contour lines. The MC2010 returned to the Ottosen model and declared concrete as frictional material. Using the principal stresses, a new, transparent (and physically really sound) form of representation of the failure surface showing the strength increase due to bi- and triaxial loading is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of concrete structures & materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of concrete structures & materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32970/CS.2019.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of concrete structures & materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32970/CS.2019.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到20世纪60年代发展起来的破坏模式都是通过测试设备来定义的:上世纪初由卡门公司开发的三轴加载箱。轴向加载采用固体加载板,中心对称横向加载采用液压加载。因此,在不考虑变形的情况下,用静水法向应力和八面体剪应力来表征破坏面是顺理成章的。1963年希尔斯多夫提出了一种刷式装载设备。Kupfer使用刷子进行了他著名的双轴加载试验,这使得通过主应力来表征混凝土强度成为可能。1977年,奥托森在他的混凝土多轴强度模型中应用了应力不变量。行政首长协调会在《新闻公报》中也做了同样的工作。156. Van Mier(1984)使用笔刷,并提出了使用等高线的3d型表示。MC2010回到Ottosen模型,并宣布混凝土为摩擦材料。利用主应力,提出了一种新的、透明的(物理上真正合理的)破坏面表示形式,显示了由于双轴和三轴加载而导致的强度增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kármán and the development of the material models of concrete
The failure models developed until the 1960ies were defined by the testing equipment: the triaxial loading cell which was developed at the beginning of the last century by Karman. The axial loading was performed with a solid loading plate, the central-symmetric transverse loading through hydraulic pressure. Therefore, the characterization of the failure surface with the hydrostatic normal stress and octahedral shear stress without any reference to deformations was a logical consequence. In 1963 Hilsdorf proposed a brush-type loading equipment. Using brushes Kupfer carried out his wellknown biaxial loading tests which made possible the characterization of concrete strength by means of the principal stresses. In 1977 Ottosen applied in his model for multiaxial strength of concrete the stress invariants. The same did CEB in the Bulletin d’Information N°. 156. Van Mier (1984) applied brushes and proposed a 3D-type representation using contour lines. The MC2010 returned to the Ottosen model and declared concrete as frictional material. Using the principal stresses, a new, transparent (and physically really sound) form of representation of the failure surface showing the strength increase due to bi- and triaxial loading is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D printing technology in medicine - review Structural aspects of topology optimization in 3D printing of concrete Extended Rankine failure criteria for concrete 3D concrete printing: Variety of aggregates, admixtures and supplementary materials 3D concrete printing structural and non-structural solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1