工作图:Meta工程师的个人关注与干扰

Yifen Chen, Peter C. Rigby, Yulin Chen, Kun Jiang, Nader Dehghani, Qianying Huang, Peter Cottle, Clayton Andrews, Noah Lee, Nachiappan Nagappan
{"title":"工作图:Meta工程师的个人关注与干扰","authors":"Yifen Chen, Peter C. Rigby, Yulin Chen, Kun Jiang, Nader Dehghani, Qianying Huang, Peter Cottle, Clayton Andrews, Noah Lee, Nachiappan Nagappan","doi":"10.1145/3540250.3558961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All engineers dislike interruptions because it takes away from the deep focus time needed to write complex code. Our goal is to reduce unnecessary interruptions at . We first describe our Workgraph platform that logs how engineers use our internal work tools at . Using these anonymized logs, we create sessions. sessions are defined in opposition to interruption and are the amount of time until the engineer is interrupted by, for example, a work chat message. We describe descriptive statistics related to how long engineers are able to focus. We find that at Meta, Engineers have a total of 14.25 hours of personal-focus time per week. These numbers are comparable with those reported by other software firms. We then create a Random Forest model to understand which factors influence the median daily personal-focus time. We find that the more time an engineer spends in the IDE the longer their focus. We also find that the more central an engineer is in the social work network, the shorter their personal-focus time. Other factors such as role and domain/pillar have little impact on personal-focus at Meta. To help engineers achieve longer blocks of personal-focus and help them stay in flow, Meta developed the AutoFocus tool that blocks work chat notifications when an engineer is working on code for 12 minutes or longer. AutoFocus allows the sender to still force a work chat message using “@notify” ensuring that urgent messages still get through, but allowing the sender to reflect on the importance of the message. In a large experiment, we find that AutoFocus increases the amount of personal-focus time by 20.27%, and it has now been rolled out widely at Meta.","PeriodicalId":68155,"journal":{"name":"软件产业与工程","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workgraph: personal focus vs. interruption for engineers at Meta\",\"authors\":\"Yifen Chen, Peter C. Rigby, Yulin Chen, Kun Jiang, Nader Dehghani, Qianying Huang, Peter Cottle, Clayton Andrews, Noah Lee, Nachiappan Nagappan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3540250.3558961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"All engineers dislike interruptions because it takes away from the deep focus time needed to write complex code. Our goal is to reduce unnecessary interruptions at . We first describe our Workgraph platform that logs how engineers use our internal work tools at . Using these anonymized logs, we create sessions. sessions are defined in opposition to interruption and are the amount of time until the engineer is interrupted by, for example, a work chat message. We describe descriptive statistics related to how long engineers are able to focus. We find that at Meta, Engineers have a total of 14.25 hours of personal-focus time per week. These numbers are comparable with those reported by other software firms. We then create a Random Forest model to understand which factors influence the median daily personal-focus time. We find that the more time an engineer spends in the IDE the longer their focus. We also find that the more central an engineer is in the social work network, the shorter their personal-focus time. Other factors such as role and domain/pillar have little impact on personal-focus at Meta. To help engineers achieve longer blocks of personal-focus and help them stay in flow, Meta developed the AutoFocus tool that blocks work chat notifications when an engineer is working on code for 12 minutes or longer. AutoFocus allows the sender to still force a work chat message using “@notify” ensuring that urgent messages still get through, but allowing the sender to reflect on the importance of the message. In a large experiment, we find that AutoFocus increases the amount of personal-focus time by 20.27%, and it has now been rolled out widely at Meta.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"软件产业与工程\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"软件产业与工程\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3540250.3558961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"软件产业与工程","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3540250.3558961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

所有的工程师都不喜欢被打断,因为这会让他们无法集中精力编写复杂的代码。我们的目标是减少不必要的干扰。我们首先描述了我们的Workgraph平台,它记录了工程师如何使用我们的内部工作工具。使用这些匿名日志,我们创建会话。会话的定义与中断相反,是工程师被工作聊天消息等打断之前的时间。我们描述了与工程师能够集中注意力的时间有关的描述性统计数据。我们发现,在Meta,工程师每周总共有14.25小时的个人专注时间。这些数据与其他软件公司报告的数据相当。然后,我们创建了一个随机森林模型来了解哪些因素会影响中位数的日常个人关注时间。我们发现,工程师花在IDE上的时间越多,他们关注的时间就越长。我们还发现,工程师在社会工作网络中的位置越中心,他们的个人关注时间就越短。其他因素,如角色和领域/支柱对Meta的个人关注影响不大。为了帮助工程师实现更长时间的个人关注,并帮助他们保持心流状态,Meta开发了AutoFocus工具,当工程师在代码上工作12分钟或更长时间时,它会阻止工作聊天通知。自动聚焦允许发送者仍然使用“@notify”强制发送工作聊天消息,以确保紧急消息仍然可以通过,但允许发送者反思消息的重要性。在一个大型实验中,我们发现AutoFocus将个人专注时间增加了20.27%,现在它已经在Meta上广泛推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Workgraph: personal focus vs. interruption for engineers at Meta
All engineers dislike interruptions because it takes away from the deep focus time needed to write complex code. Our goal is to reduce unnecessary interruptions at . We first describe our Workgraph platform that logs how engineers use our internal work tools at . Using these anonymized logs, we create sessions. sessions are defined in opposition to interruption and are the amount of time until the engineer is interrupted by, for example, a work chat message. We describe descriptive statistics related to how long engineers are able to focus. We find that at Meta, Engineers have a total of 14.25 hours of personal-focus time per week. These numbers are comparable with those reported by other software firms. We then create a Random Forest model to understand which factors influence the median daily personal-focus time. We find that the more time an engineer spends in the IDE the longer their focus. We also find that the more central an engineer is in the social work network, the shorter their personal-focus time. Other factors such as role and domain/pillar have little impact on personal-focus at Meta. To help engineers achieve longer blocks of personal-focus and help them stay in flow, Meta developed the AutoFocus tool that blocks work chat notifications when an engineer is working on code for 12 minutes or longer. AutoFocus allows the sender to still force a work chat message using “@notify” ensuring that urgent messages still get through, but allowing the sender to reflect on the importance of the message. In a large experiment, we find that AutoFocus increases the amount of personal-focus time by 20.27%, and it has now been rolled out widely at Meta.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
676
期刊最新文献
Improving Grading Outcomes in Software Engineering Projects Through Automated Contributions Summaries GRADESTYLE: GitHub-Integrated and Automated Assessment of Java Code Style Improving Assessment of Programming Pattern Knowledge through Code Editing and Revision Designing for Real People: Teaching Agility through User-Centric Service Design Using Focus to Personalise Learning and Feedback in Software Engineering Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1