阿拉斯加朱诺冰原冰川形态和动态的近期快速而深刻的变化

B. Davies, Jacob M. Bendle, R. McNabb, J. Carrivick, C. McNeil, S. Campbell, M. Pelto
{"title":"阿拉斯加朱诺冰原冰川形态和动态的近期快速而深刻的变化","authors":"B. Davies, Jacob M. Bendle, R. McNabb, J. Carrivick, C. McNeil, S. Campbell, M. Pelto","doi":"10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Alaskan region (comprising glaciers in Alaska, British Columbia and Yukon) contains the third largest ice volume outside of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and contributes more to global sea level rise than any other glacierised region defined by the Randolph Glacier Inventory. However, ice loss in this area is not linear, but in part controlled by glacier hypsometry as valley and outlet glaciers are at risk of becoming detached from their accumulation areas during thinning. Plateau icefields, such as Juneau Icefield in Alaska, are very sensitive to changes in Equilibrium Line Altitude (ELA) as this can result in rapidly shrinking accumulation areas. Here, we present detailed geomorphological mapping around Juneau Icefield and use this data to reconstruct the icefield during the &#8220;Little Ice Age&#8221;. We use topographic maps, archival aerial photographs, high-resolution satellite imagery and digital elevation models to map glacier lake and glacier area and volume change from the Little Ice Age to the present day (1770, 1948, 1979, 1990, 2005, 2015 and 2019 AD). Structural glaciological mapping (1979 and 2019) highlights structural and topographic controls on non-linear glacier recession.&#160; Our data shows pronounced glacier thinning and recession in response to widespread detachment of outlet glaciers from their plateau accumulation areas. Glacier detachments became common after 2005, and occurred with increasing frequency since then. Total summed rates of area change increased eightfold from 1770-1948 (-6.14 km<sup>2</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>) to 2015-2019 (-45.23 km<sup>2</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>). Total rates of recession were consistent from 1770 to 1990 AD, and grew increasingly rapid after 2005, in line with regional warming.</p>","PeriodicalId":22413,"journal":{"name":"The EGU General Assembly","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent, rapid and profound changes to glacier morphology and dynamics, Juneau Icefield, Alaska\",\"authors\":\"B. Davies, Jacob M. Bendle, R. McNabb, J. Carrivick, C. McNeil, S. Campbell, M. Pelto\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-1539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Alaskan region (comprising glaciers in Alaska, British Columbia and Yukon) contains the third largest ice volume outside of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and contributes more to global sea level rise than any other glacierised region defined by the Randolph Glacier Inventory. However, ice loss in this area is not linear, but in part controlled by glacier hypsometry as valley and outlet glaciers are at risk of becoming detached from their accumulation areas during thinning. Plateau icefields, such as Juneau Icefield in Alaska, are very sensitive to changes in Equilibrium Line Altitude (ELA) as this can result in rapidly shrinking accumulation areas. Here, we present detailed geomorphological mapping around Juneau Icefield and use this data to reconstruct the icefield during the &#8220;Little Ice Age&#8221;. We use topographic maps, archival aerial photographs, high-resolution satellite imagery and digital elevation models to map glacier lake and glacier area and volume change from the Little Ice Age to the present day (1770, 1948, 1979, 1990, 2005, 2015 and 2019 AD). Structural glaciological mapping (1979 and 2019) highlights structural and topographic controls on non-linear glacier recession.&#160; Our data shows pronounced glacier thinning and recession in response to widespread detachment of outlet glaciers from their plateau accumulation areas. Glacier detachments became common after 2005, and occurred with increasing frequency since then. Total summed rates of area change increased eightfold from 1770-1948 (-6.14 km<sup>2</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>) to 2015-2019 (-45.23 km<sup>2</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>). Total rates of recession were consistent from 1770 to 1990 AD, and grew increasingly rapid after 2005, in line with regional warming.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The EGU General Assembly\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The EGU General Assembly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-1539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The EGU General Assembly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-1539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿拉斯加地区(包括阿拉斯加、不列颠哥伦比亚省和育空地区的冰川)拥有除格陵兰岛和南极冰盖之外的第三大冰量,并且对全球海平面上升的贡献比伦道夫冰川清单中定义的任何其他冰川地区都要大。然而,该地区的冰损失不是线性的,而是在一定程度上受到冰川减少的控制,因为山谷和出口冰川在变薄过程中有脱离其积累区的危险。高原冰原,如阿拉斯加的朱诺冰原,对平衡线高度(ELA)的变化非常敏感,因为这可能导致堆积面积迅速缩小。在这里,我们展示了朱诺冰原周围的详细地貌地图,并使用这些数据重建了小冰期的冰原。我们使用地形图、档案航空照片、高分辨率卫星图像和数字高程模型来绘制小冰期至今(公元1770年、1948年、1979年、1990年、2005年、2015年和2019年)的冰川湖泊和冰川面积和体积变化。结构冰川学制图(1979年和2019年)强调了非线性冰川消退的结构和地形控制。 我们的数据显示,由于出口冰川从高原堆积区广泛分离,冰川明显变薄和退缩。冰川分离在2005年之后变得普遍,并且从那时起发生的频率越来越高。从1770-1948年(-6.14 km2 a-1)到2015-2019年(-45.23 km2 a-1),总面积变化率增加了8倍。从公元1770年到1990年,衰退的总速率是一致的,并且在2005年之后增长越来越快,与区域变暖一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recent, rapid and profound changes to glacier morphology and dynamics, Juneau Icefield, Alaska

The Alaskan region (comprising glaciers in Alaska, British Columbia and Yukon) contains the third largest ice volume outside of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and contributes more to global sea level rise than any other glacierised region defined by the Randolph Glacier Inventory. However, ice loss in this area is not linear, but in part controlled by glacier hypsometry as valley and outlet glaciers are at risk of becoming detached from their accumulation areas during thinning. Plateau icefields, such as Juneau Icefield in Alaska, are very sensitive to changes in Equilibrium Line Altitude (ELA) as this can result in rapidly shrinking accumulation areas. Here, we present detailed geomorphological mapping around Juneau Icefield and use this data to reconstruct the icefield during the “Little Ice Age”. We use topographic maps, archival aerial photographs, high-resolution satellite imagery and digital elevation models to map glacier lake and glacier area and volume change from the Little Ice Age to the present day (1770, 1948, 1979, 1990, 2005, 2015 and 2019 AD). Structural glaciological mapping (1979 and 2019) highlights structural and topographic controls on non-linear glacier recession.  Our data shows pronounced glacier thinning and recession in response to widespread detachment of outlet glaciers from their plateau accumulation areas. Glacier detachments became common after 2005, and occurred with increasing frequency since then. Total summed rates of area change increased eightfold from 1770-1948 (-6.14 km2 a-1) to 2015-2019 (-45.23 km2 a-1). Total rates of recession were consistent from 1770 to 1990 AD, and grew increasingly rapid after 2005, in line with regional warming.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GROOPS: An open-source software package for GNSS processing and gravity field recovery Global flood monitoring with GRACE/GRACE-FO Statistical relations between in-situ measured Bz component and thermospheric density variations Current status of project SWEETS: Estimating thermospheric neutral mass densities from satellite data at various altitudes Blast vibration reduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1