A. Burden, A. Gruneir, J. M. Paterson, S. Cadarette
{"title":"口服双膦酸盐治疗的暴露错误分类和相关骨折风险:一项队列研究","authors":"A. Burden, A. Gruneir, J. M. Paterson, S. Cadarette","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Using pharmacy claims data we previously identified exposure misclassification in pharmacy claims data that underestimated oral bisphosphonate compliance, particularly in long-term care (LTC). In this study we examined the impact of exposure misclassification in pharmacy claims data on estimates of drug effectiveness using osteoporosis pharmacotherapy and hip fractures as a case example. \nMethods: We identified new users of oral bisphosphonates, aged 66 or more years, using Ontario claims data. Compliance was quantified by the proportion of days covered (PDC) and categorized into groups during a 365-day ascertainment period. PDC was calculated using observed and cleaned days supply values. Hip fracture rates were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for behavioral and fracture risk factors. Low compliance (PDC < 20%) was the referent. Analyses were completed overall and separately for patients in community and LTC settings. \nResults: The rate of hip fracture was higher in LTC (2.4/100 patient-years) than in the community (1.0/100 patient-years). Following data cleaning, to adjust for exposure misclassification, the estimated benefit of high compliance (PDC ≥ 80%) on fracture prevention (HRobserved = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.66-0.83; HRcleaned = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.57-0.74) increased. Risk estimates were similar among community-dwelling patients (HRobserved = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60–0.77; HRcleaned = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.56–0.75), yet differed substantially in LTC (HRobserved = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.73–1.26; HRcleaned = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.46–0.91). \nConclusion: Exposure misclassification can bias estimates of drug effectiveness. While minimal change was noted in the community setting where most studies are completed, large differences were noted in LTC where fracture risk was highest. These results highlight the importance of understanding and examining the potential for exposure misclassification prior to data analysis in pharmacoepidemiology, particularly when including LTC settings.","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"11 2 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Exposure Misclassification of Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy and the Associated Fracture Risk: A Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Burden, A. Gruneir, J. M. Paterson, S. Cadarette\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-1052.1000188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Using pharmacy claims data we previously identified exposure misclassification in pharmacy claims data that underestimated oral bisphosphonate compliance, particularly in long-term care (LTC). In this study we examined the impact of exposure misclassification in pharmacy claims data on estimates of drug effectiveness using osteoporosis pharmacotherapy and hip fractures as a case example. \\nMethods: We identified new users of oral bisphosphonates, aged 66 or more years, using Ontario claims data. Compliance was quantified by the proportion of days covered (PDC) and categorized into groups during a 365-day ascertainment period. PDC was calculated using observed and cleaned days supply values. Hip fracture rates were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for behavioral and fracture risk factors. Low compliance (PDC < 20%) was the referent. Analyses were completed overall and separately for patients in community and LTC settings. \\nResults: The rate of hip fracture was higher in LTC (2.4/100 patient-years) than in the community (1.0/100 patient-years). Following data cleaning, to adjust for exposure misclassification, the estimated benefit of high compliance (PDC ≥ 80%) on fracture prevention (HRobserved = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.66-0.83; HRcleaned = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.57-0.74) increased. Risk estimates were similar among community-dwelling patients (HRobserved = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60–0.77; HRcleaned = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.56–0.75), yet differed substantially in LTC (HRobserved = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.73–1.26; HRcleaned = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.46–0.91). \\nConclusion: Exposure misclassification can bias estimates of drug effectiveness. While minimal change was noted in the community setting where most studies are completed, large differences were noted in LTC where fracture risk was highest. These results highlight the importance of understanding and examining the potential for exposure misclassification prior to data analysis in pharmacoepidemiology, particularly when including LTC settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"11 2 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
引言:利用药房索赔数据,我们先前发现药房索赔数据中的暴露错误分类低估了口服双膦酸盐的依从性,特别是在长期护理(LTC)中。在这项研究中,我们以骨质疏松症药物治疗和髋部骨折为例,研究了药房索赔数据中暴露错误分类对药物有效性估计的影响。方法:我们使用安大略省的索赔数据,确定66岁或以上的口服双膦酸盐新使用者。通过覆盖天数(PDC)的比例来量化依从性,并在365天的确定期内进行分组。PDC是根据观察到的和清洗过的天数来计算的。采用Cox比例风险模型计算髋部骨折发生率,并根据行为和骨折危险因素进行调整。参照低依从性(PDC < 20%)。对社区和LTC环境中的患者进行整体和单独的分析。结果:LTC患者髋部骨折发生率(2.4/100患者-年)高于社区患者(1.0/100患者-年)。在数据清洗后,为了校正暴露错误分类,估计高依从性(PDC≥80%)对预防骨折的益处(HRobserved = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.66-0.83;HRcleaned = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.57-0.74)增高。社区居住患者的风险估计相似(hrobserve = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60-0.77;HRcleaned = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.56-0.75),但在LTC中差异很大(hrobserve = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.73-1.26;HRcleaned = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.46-0.91)。结论:暴露程度的错误分类可能导致药物有效性估计的偏差。虽然在大多数研究完成的社区环境中发现的变化很小,但在骨折风险最高的LTC中发现的差异很大。这些结果强调了在药物流行病学数据分析之前理解和检查暴露错误分类可能性的重要性,特别是在包括LTC设置时。
Examining Exposure Misclassification of Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy and the Associated Fracture Risk: A Cohort Study
Introduction: Using pharmacy claims data we previously identified exposure misclassification in pharmacy claims data that underestimated oral bisphosphonate compliance, particularly in long-term care (LTC). In this study we examined the impact of exposure misclassification in pharmacy claims data on estimates of drug effectiveness using osteoporosis pharmacotherapy and hip fractures as a case example.
Methods: We identified new users of oral bisphosphonates, aged 66 or more years, using Ontario claims data. Compliance was quantified by the proportion of days covered (PDC) and categorized into groups during a 365-day ascertainment period. PDC was calculated using observed and cleaned days supply values. Hip fracture rates were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for behavioral and fracture risk factors. Low compliance (PDC < 20%) was the referent. Analyses were completed overall and separately for patients in community and LTC settings.
Results: The rate of hip fracture was higher in LTC (2.4/100 patient-years) than in the community (1.0/100 patient-years). Following data cleaning, to adjust for exposure misclassification, the estimated benefit of high compliance (PDC ≥ 80%) on fracture prevention (HRobserved = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.66-0.83; HRcleaned = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.57-0.74) increased. Risk estimates were similar among community-dwelling patients (HRobserved = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60–0.77; HRcleaned = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.56–0.75), yet differed substantially in LTC (HRobserved = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.73–1.26; HRcleaned = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.46–0.91).
Conclusion: Exposure misclassification can bias estimates of drug effectiveness. While minimal change was noted in the community setting where most studies are completed, large differences were noted in LTC where fracture risk was highest. These results highlight the importance of understanding and examining the potential for exposure misclassification prior to data analysis in pharmacoepidemiology, particularly when including LTC settings.