{"title":"新时代的文学与权力:制度与分裂","authors":"N. Ivanova","doi":"10.1080/19409419.2018.1535911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last time literature had a serious influence in this country and stood up to the authorities was during the period of so-called ‘perestroika and glasnost.’ That period was marked by an incredible jump in the circulation of books and, even more so, of journals (2,500,000 for Novy mir, 1,800,000 for Druzhba narodov, 1,000,000 for Znamya, with comparable figures for other periodicals). Another indicator of the writers’ high status was their success in politics. Parliamentary elections were direct, open, and honest; they empowered real writers – Yevgeny Yevtushenko, Vitaly Korotich, Fazil Iskander, Sergei Averintsev, Boris Oleynik... Literary criticism flourished, and even non-specialists dabbled in it. A good example is Gavril Popov’s acclaimed review of Alexander Bek’s novel The New Appointment in which he discussed the ‘administrative-command system’ (Popov, 1986). Real criticism was in the lead during perestroika, apprizing readers of previously banned books that finally saw the light of day when censorship ended in 1990. Over time, the trove of ‘banned’ books emptied out, publications decreased, circulations went down, and literature went into decline. Its impact turned out to be largely illusory. Little by little, literature turned upon itself, while criticism abandoned its lofty mission of enlightenment and returned to its traditional concerns. No wonder the first independent award for critics founded in the new era was named after the nineteenth -century critic Apollon Grigoriev whose ‘organic criticism’ privileged aesthetic analysis over public engagement. New fault lines surfaced in the 90s when society and readership splintered and unprecedented literary institutions sprang up across the country. Two names frequently mentioned in this period served to highlight the new trends: Soros and Booker. Both came to Russia from the West, both referred to institutions of key significance to the literary world. One, initiated by the Soros Foundation (Open Society Foundations), aimed to boost literary periodicals in Russia. The other, the Booker (Russian Booker), was a nonstate literary award for the best Russian novel. The Apollon Grigoriev prize also had no state sponsor; it was sponsored by two Russian billionaires, Mikhail Prokhorov and Vladimir Potanin, and ONEXIM Bank.","PeriodicalId":53456,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Communication","volume":"149 1","pages":"251 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literature and power in the new age: institutions and divisions\",\"authors\":\"N. Ivanova\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19409419.2018.1535911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The last time literature had a serious influence in this country and stood up to the authorities was during the period of so-called ‘perestroika and glasnost.’ That period was marked by an incredible jump in the circulation of books and, even more so, of journals (2,500,000 for Novy mir, 1,800,000 for Druzhba narodov, 1,000,000 for Znamya, with comparable figures for other periodicals). Another indicator of the writers’ high status was their success in politics. Parliamentary elections were direct, open, and honest; they empowered real writers – Yevgeny Yevtushenko, Vitaly Korotich, Fazil Iskander, Sergei Averintsev, Boris Oleynik... Literary criticism flourished, and even non-specialists dabbled in it. A good example is Gavril Popov’s acclaimed review of Alexander Bek’s novel The New Appointment in which he discussed the ‘administrative-command system’ (Popov, 1986). Real criticism was in the lead during perestroika, apprizing readers of previously banned books that finally saw the light of day when censorship ended in 1990. Over time, the trove of ‘banned’ books emptied out, publications decreased, circulations went down, and literature went into decline. Its impact turned out to be largely illusory. Little by little, literature turned upon itself, while criticism abandoned its lofty mission of enlightenment and returned to its traditional concerns. No wonder the first independent award for critics founded in the new era was named after the nineteenth -century critic Apollon Grigoriev whose ‘organic criticism’ privileged aesthetic analysis over public engagement. New fault lines surfaced in the 90s when society and readership splintered and unprecedented literary institutions sprang up across the country. Two names frequently mentioned in this period served to highlight the new trends: Soros and Booker. Both came to Russia from the West, both referred to institutions of key significance to the literary world. One, initiated by the Soros Foundation (Open Society Foundations), aimed to boost literary periodicals in Russia. The other, the Booker (Russian Booker), was a nonstate literary award for the best Russian novel. The Apollon Grigoriev prize also had no state sponsor; it was sponsored by two Russian billionaires, Mikhail Prokhorov and Vladimir Potanin, and ONEXIM Bank.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"251 - 261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2018.1535911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2018.1535911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
上一次文学在这个国家产生重大影响并对抗当局是在所谓的“改革和开放”时期。这一时期的特点是图书发行量的惊人增长,期刊发行量更是如此(《新月刊》250万册,《德鲁日巴·纳罗多夫》180万册,《Znamya》100万册,其他期刊也有类似的数字)。这些作家地位高的另一个标志是他们在政治上的成功。议会选举是直接、公开和诚实的;他们赋予了真正的作家——叶夫根尼·叶夫图申科、维塔利·科罗蒂奇、法齐尔·伊斯坎德尔、谢尔盖·阿维林采夫、鲍里斯·奥利尼克……文学批评蓬勃发展,甚至非专业人士也涉足其中。一个很好的例子是加夫里尔·波波夫(Gavril Popov)对亚历山大·贝克(Alexander Bek)的小说《新任命》(The New Appointment)的评论,他在其中讨论了“行政指挥系统”(Popov, 1986)。真正的批评在改革期间处于主导地位,在1990年审查制度结束后,那些以前被禁的书终于看到了曙光。随着时间的推移,“禁书”的宝库被清空,出版物减少,发行量下降,文学走向衰落。事实证明,它的影响在很大程度上是虚幻的。文学逐渐转向自身,而批评则放弃了启蒙的崇高使命,回归到传统的关注。难怪新时代成立的第一个独立评论家奖是以19世纪评论家阿波罗·格里戈里耶夫(Apollon Grigoriev)的名字命名的,他的“有机批评”将美学分析置于公众参与之上。新的断层线在90年代浮出水面,当时社会和读者分裂,前所未有的文学机构在全国各地涌现。这一时期经常被提及的两个名字突显了新趋势:索罗斯和布克。两者都是从西方传入俄罗斯的,都涉及到对文学界具有重要意义的机构。一个是由索罗斯基金会(开放社会基金会)发起的,旨在促进俄罗斯文学期刊的发展。另一个是布克奖(俄罗斯布克奖),这是一个非国家文学奖,旨在表彰最佳俄罗斯小说。阿波罗·格里戈里耶夫奖也没有国家赞助;它是由两位俄罗斯亿万富翁米哈伊尔·普罗霍罗夫和弗拉基米尔·波塔宁以及ONEXIM银行赞助的。
Literature and power in the new age: institutions and divisions
The last time literature had a serious influence in this country and stood up to the authorities was during the period of so-called ‘perestroika and glasnost.’ That period was marked by an incredible jump in the circulation of books and, even more so, of journals (2,500,000 for Novy mir, 1,800,000 for Druzhba narodov, 1,000,000 for Znamya, with comparable figures for other periodicals). Another indicator of the writers’ high status was their success in politics. Parliamentary elections were direct, open, and honest; they empowered real writers – Yevgeny Yevtushenko, Vitaly Korotich, Fazil Iskander, Sergei Averintsev, Boris Oleynik... Literary criticism flourished, and even non-specialists dabbled in it. A good example is Gavril Popov’s acclaimed review of Alexander Bek’s novel The New Appointment in which he discussed the ‘administrative-command system’ (Popov, 1986). Real criticism was in the lead during perestroika, apprizing readers of previously banned books that finally saw the light of day when censorship ended in 1990. Over time, the trove of ‘banned’ books emptied out, publications decreased, circulations went down, and literature went into decline. Its impact turned out to be largely illusory. Little by little, literature turned upon itself, while criticism abandoned its lofty mission of enlightenment and returned to its traditional concerns. No wonder the first independent award for critics founded in the new era was named after the nineteenth -century critic Apollon Grigoriev whose ‘organic criticism’ privileged aesthetic analysis over public engagement. New fault lines surfaced in the 90s when society and readership splintered and unprecedented literary institutions sprang up across the country. Two names frequently mentioned in this period served to highlight the new trends: Soros and Booker. Both came to Russia from the West, both referred to institutions of key significance to the literary world. One, initiated by the Soros Foundation (Open Society Foundations), aimed to boost literary periodicals in Russia. The other, the Booker (Russian Booker), was a nonstate literary award for the best Russian novel. The Apollon Grigoriev prize also had no state sponsor; it was sponsored by two Russian billionaires, Mikhail Prokhorov and Vladimir Potanin, and ONEXIM Bank.
期刊介绍:
Russian Journal of Communication (RJC) is an international peer-reviewed academic publication devoted to studies of communication in, with, and about Russia and Russian-speaking communities around the world. RJC welcomes both humanistic and social scientific scholarly approaches to communication, which is broadly construed to include mediated information as well as face-to-face interactions. RJC seeks papers and book reviews on topics including philosophy of communication, traditional and new media, film, literature, rhetoric, journalism, information-communication technologies, cultural practices, organizational and group dynamics, interpersonal communication, communication in instructional contexts, advertising, public relations, political campaigns, legal proceedings, environmental and health matters, and communication policy.