[Tecfidera®(延迟释放富马酸二甲基)治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症]

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.7175/FE.V18I2S.1320
L. Mantovani, G. Furneri, P. Cortesi, M. Amato, A. Caputi, P. Piacentini, A. Solari, C. Pozzilli, G. Comi
{"title":"[Tecfidera®(延迟释放富马酸二甲基)治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症]","authors":"L. Mantovani, G. Furneri, P. Cortesi, M. Amato, A. Caputi, P. Piacentini, A. Solari, C. Pozzilli, G. Comi","doi":"10.7175/FE.V18I2S.1320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present health technology assessment (HTA) evaluates the clinical and economic profile of delayed-release dimethylfumarate (DMF, also known as gastro-resistant DMF) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Italy. Chapter 1 briefly introduces the condition (multiple sclerosis and, more specifically, the relapsing-remitting form) and provides an overall description of the main therapeutic options for physicians, in terms of clinical evidence, regulatory status in Europe and approval status and reimbursement (refunding) criteria in Italy. In the next sections (Chapters 2-5), key-topics regarding RRMS are analysed: epidemiology, clinical burden, quality of life/social impact and the economic implications for healthcare services, patients and society. In Chapter 6, the clinical evidence supporting the use of DMF in RRMS is summarized. Data from phase III randomized clinical trials (DEFINE, CONFIRM), plus the pooled post-hoc analysis of the two studies, were evaluated to assess the level of clinical benefit provided by DMF. Finally, in Chapter 7, a review of the health economic evidence assessing DMF is performed, with a specific focus on Italy. Overall, the methodological quality of registration studies, together with the robustness and consistency of the study results, support the conclusion that DMF is an effective and safe treatment for RRMS. The economic assessment of DMF in Italy, based on cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses (adopting clinical input data from a mixed treatment comparison and economic input data relative to the Italian healthcare setting), confirm that DMF is a cost-effective and economically sustainable treatment for the Italian National Healthcare Service. These findings are in line with the results of most international publications and the assessments from well-recognized HTA agencies (e.g. NICE/SMC). In summary, both the clinical and economic evidence analyzed in this HTA substantiate DMF as an important therapeutic option for the treatment of RRMS.","PeriodicalId":41585,"journal":{"name":"Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Tecfidera® (delayed-release dimethylfumarate) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis]\",\"authors\":\"L. Mantovani, G. Furneri, P. Cortesi, M. Amato, A. Caputi, P. Piacentini, A. Solari, C. Pozzilli, G. Comi\",\"doi\":\"10.7175/FE.V18I2S.1320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present health technology assessment (HTA) evaluates the clinical and economic profile of delayed-release dimethylfumarate (DMF, also known as gastro-resistant DMF) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Italy. Chapter 1 briefly introduces the condition (multiple sclerosis and, more specifically, the relapsing-remitting form) and provides an overall description of the main therapeutic options for physicians, in terms of clinical evidence, regulatory status in Europe and approval status and reimbursement (refunding) criteria in Italy. In the next sections (Chapters 2-5), key-topics regarding RRMS are analysed: epidemiology, clinical burden, quality of life/social impact and the economic implications for healthcare services, patients and society. In Chapter 6, the clinical evidence supporting the use of DMF in RRMS is summarized. Data from phase III randomized clinical trials (DEFINE, CONFIRM), plus the pooled post-hoc analysis of the two studies, were evaluated to assess the level of clinical benefit provided by DMF. Finally, in Chapter 7, a review of the health economic evidence assessing DMF is performed, with a specific focus on Italy. Overall, the methodological quality of registration studies, together with the robustness and consistency of the study results, support the conclusion that DMF is an effective and safe treatment for RRMS. The economic assessment of DMF in Italy, based on cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses (adopting clinical input data from a mixed treatment comparison and economic input data relative to the Italian healthcare setting), confirm that DMF is a cost-effective and economically sustainable treatment for the Italian National Healthcare Service. These findings are in line with the results of most international publications and the assessments from well-recognized HTA agencies (e.g. NICE/SMC). In summary, both the clinical and economic evidence analyzed in this HTA substantiate DMF as an important therapeutic option for the treatment of RRMS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7175/FE.V18I2S.1320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7175/FE.V18I2S.1320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前的卫生技术评估(HTA)评估了延迟释放富马酸二甲基(DMF,也称为胃耐药DMF)在意大利治疗复发-缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的临床和经济状况。第1章简要介绍了病情(多发性硬化症,更具体地说,复发缓解型),并从临床证据、欧洲的监管状况和意大利的批准状况和报销(退款)标准等方面,为医生提供了主要治疗方案的总体描述。在接下来的章节(第2-5章)中,分析了关于RRMS的关键主题:流行病学,临床负担,生活质量/社会影响以及对医疗保健服务,患者和社会的经济影响。第六章总结了支持在RRMS中使用DMF的临床证据。来自III期随机临床试验(DEFINE, CONFIRM)的数据,加上两项研究的合并事后分析,评估了DMF提供的临床获益水平。最后,在第7章中,对评估DMF的卫生经济证据进行了审查,特别关注意大利。总体而言,注册研究的方法学质量以及研究结果的稳健性和一致性支持DMF是RRMS有效和安全的治疗方法的结论。根据成本效益和预算影响分析(采用来自混合治疗比较的临床输入数据和相对于意大利医疗保健环境的经济输入数据),对意大利DMF进行的经济评估证实,DMF是意大利国家医疗保健服务具有成本效益和经济上可持续的治疗方法。这些发现与大多数国际出版物的结果和公认的HTA机构(如NICE/SMC)的评估一致。总之,本HTA分析的临床和经济证据均证实DMF是治疗RRMS的重要治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Tecfidera® (delayed-release dimethylfumarate) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis]
The present health technology assessment (HTA) evaluates the clinical and economic profile of delayed-release dimethylfumarate (DMF, also known as gastro-resistant DMF) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Italy. Chapter 1 briefly introduces the condition (multiple sclerosis and, more specifically, the relapsing-remitting form) and provides an overall description of the main therapeutic options for physicians, in terms of clinical evidence, regulatory status in Europe and approval status and reimbursement (refunding) criteria in Italy. In the next sections (Chapters 2-5), key-topics regarding RRMS are analysed: epidemiology, clinical burden, quality of life/social impact and the economic implications for healthcare services, patients and society. In Chapter 6, the clinical evidence supporting the use of DMF in RRMS is summarized. Data from phase III randomized clinical trials (DEFINE, CONFIRM), plus the pooled post-hoc analysis of the two studies, were evaluated to assess the level of clinical benefit provided by DMF. Finally, in Chapter 7, a review of the health economic evidence assessing DMF is performed, with a specific focus on Italy. Overall, the methodological quality of registration studies, together with the robustness and consistency of the study results, support the conclusion that DMF is an effective and safe treatment for RRMS. The economic assessment of DMF in Italy, based on cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses (adopting clinical input data from a mixed treatment comparison and economic input data relative to the Italian healthcare setting), confirm that DMF is a cost-effective and economically sustainable treatment for the Italian National Healthcare Service. These findings are in line with the results of most international publications and the assessments from well-recognized HTA agencies (e.g. NICE/SMC). In summary, both the clinical and economic evidence analyzed in this HTA substantiate DMF as an important therapeutic option for the treatment of RRMS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
The Importance of the Pharmacoeconomic Analyses in Drug Negotiation. A Farewell Editorial [Measurement-Based Procurement Approach for Biosimilars in Italy: A Position Paper] [Burden of Short Bowel Syndrome in Italy: Direct and Indirect Costs and Quality of Life] Cost-effectiveness of Empagliflozin, in Addition to Metformin, in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Italy [Budget Impact Analysis of the Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in the Elderly in Italy]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1