日常政治中的横向与后现代女性主义实践

J. Roth, Lori A. Chambers
{"title":"日常政治中的横向与后现代女性主义实践","authors":"J. Roth, Lori A. Chambers","doi":"10.7202/1066417ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feminist praxis is usually a conscious, reflexive, process of  moving from theory to application in order to create transformation. We want to expand the scope of feminist praxis, however, to include moments in which feminist theory explains political transformations that may not be deliberate, but that result in a feminist outcome:  the pursuit of gender equality through personal and political transformation.  This paper uses a dataset of online comments generated after the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. N.S. as a case study, and it sits in conversation with postmodern and transversal feminist theorists, particularly the recent work of Patricia Hill Collins (2017) that builds on Nira Yuval-Davis (1997) and others, to argue that political action is most effective when transversal practice is layered onto intersectional politics; and that, despite Hill Collins’ concern that political practice has yet to move to effective transversalism (2017, 1471), transversal feminist praxis can be found in examples of everyday politics which offer hope for social transformation.","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transversal and Postmodern Feminist Praxis in Everyday Politics\",\"authors\":\"J. Roth, Lori A. Chambers\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1066417ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feminist praxis is usually a conscious, reflexive, process of  moving from theory to application in order to create transformation. We want to expand the scope of feminist praxis, however, to include moments in which feminist theory explains political transformations that may not be deliberate, but that result in a feminist outcome:  the pursuit of gender equality through personal and political transformation.  This paper uses a dataset of online comments generated after the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. N.S. as a case study, and it sits in conversation with postmodern and transversal feminist theorists, particularly the recent work of Patricia Hill Collins (2017) that builds on Nira Yuval-Davis (1997) and others, to argue that political action is most effective when transversal practice is layered onto intersectional politics; and that, despite Hill Collins’ concern that political practice has yet to move to effective transversalism (2017, 1471), transversal feminist praxis can be found in examples of everyday politics which offer hope for social transformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066417ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066417ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

女权主义实践通常是一个有意识的、反思的、从理论到应用的过程,以创造变革。然而,我们希望扩大女权主义实践的范围,包括女权主义理论解释政治变革的时刻,这些变革可能不是刻意的,但会导致女权主义的结果:通过个人和政治转型追求性别平等。本文使用加拿大最高法院在R. v. N.S.一案中做出裁决后产生的在线评论数据集作为案例研究,并与后现代和横向女权主义理论家进行了对话,特别是Patricia Hill Collins(2017)在Nira Yuval-Davis(1997)等人的基础上最近的工作,认为当横向实践分层到交叉政治时,政治行动是最有效的;而且,尽管希尔·柯林斯(Hill Collins)担心政治实践尚未转向有效的横向主义(2017,1471),但横向女权主义实践可以在日常政治的例子中找到,这些例子为社会转型提供了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transversal and Postmodern Feminist Praxis in Everyday Politics
Feminist praxis is usually a conscious, reflexive, process of  moving from theory to application in order to create transformation. We want to expand the scope of feminist praxis, however, to include moments in which feminist theory explains political transformations that may not be deliberate, but that result in a feminist outcome:  the pursuit of gender equality through personal and political transformation.  This paper uses a dataset of online comments generated after the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. N.S. as a case study, and it sits in conversation with postmodern and transversal feminist theorists, particularly the recent work of Patricia Hill Collins (2017) that builds on Nira Yuval-Davis (1997) and others, to argue that political action is most effective when transversal practice is layered onto intersectional politics; and that, despite Hill Collins’ concern that political practice has yet to move to effective transversalism (2017, 1471), transversal feminist praxis can be found in examples of everyday politics which offer hope for social transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women's Lived Experiences of the Gender Gap: Gender Inequalities from Multiple Global Perspectives Trauma as “the bedrock of hysteria” Why I Left My Book Club Transversal and Postmodern Feminist Praxis in Everyday Politics Gender, Victimization, and Commercial Sex: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1