Women's Lived Experiences of the Gender Gap: Gender Inequalities from Multiple Global Perspectives. An article from journal Atlantis ("Mis/classification: Identity-based Inequities in the Canadian and Global Post-secondary Context" and Open-themed), on Érudit.
{"title":"Women's Lived Experiences of the Gender Gap: Gender Inequalities from Multiple Global Perspectives","authors":"Yang Han","doi":"10.7202/1096958ar","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1096958ar","url":null,"abstract":"Women's Lived Experiences of the Gender Gap: Gender Inequalities from Multiple Global Perspectives. An article from journal Atlantis (\"Mis/classification: Identity-based Inequities in the Canadian and Global Post-secondary Context\" and Open-themed), on Érudit.","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135996570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trauma as “the bedrock of hysteria”","authors":"Élisabeth Lamothe","doi":"10.7202/1066424ar","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066424ar","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85486120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Why I Left My Book Club","authors":"Dorsía Smith Silva","doi":"10.7202/1066425ar","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066425ar","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86056818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Feminist praxis is usually a conscious, reflexive, process of moving from theory to application in order to create transformation. We want to expand the scope of feminist praxis, however, to include moments in which feminist theory explains political transformations that may not be deliberate, but that result in a feminist outcome: the pursuit of gender equality through personal and political transformation. This paper uses a dataset of online comments generated after the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. N.S. as a case study, and it sits in conversation with postmodern and transversal feminist theorists, particularly the recent work of Patricia Hill Collins (2017) that builds on Nira Yuval-Davis (1997) and others, to argue that political action is most effective when transversal practice is layered onto intersectional politics; and that, despite Hill Collins’ concern that political practice has yet to move to effective transversalism (2017, 1471), transversal feminist praxis can be found in examples of everyday politics which offer hope for social transformation.
女权主义实践通常是一个有意识的、反思的、从理论到应用的过程，以创造变革。然而，我们希望扩大女权主义实践的范围，包括女权主义理论解释政治变革的时刻，这些变革可能不是刻意的，但会导致女权主义的结果:通过个人和政治转型追求性别平等。本文使用加拿大最高法院在R. v. N.S.一案中做出裁决后产生的在线评论数据集作为案例研究，并与后现代和横向女权主义理论家进行了对话，特别是Patricia Hill Collins(2017)在Nira Yuval-Davis(1997)等人的基础上最近的工作，认为当横向实践分层到交叉政治时，政治行动是最有效的;而且，尽管希尔·柯林斯(Hill Collins)担心政治实践尚未转向有效的横向主义(2017,1471)，但横向女权主义实践可以在日常政治的例子中找到，这些例子为社会转型提供了希望。
{"title":"Transversal and Postmodern Feminist Praxis in Everyday Politics","authors":"J. Roth, Lori A. Chambers","doi":"10.7202/1066417ar","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066417ar","url":null,"abstract":"Feminist praxis is usually a conscious, reflexive, process of moving from theory to application in order to create transformation. We want to expand the scope of feminist praxis, however, to include moments in which feminist theory explains political transformations that may not be deliberate, but that result in a feminist outcome: the pursuit of gender equality through personal and political transformation. This paper uses a dataset of online comments generated after the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. N.S. as a case study, and it sits in conversation with postmodern and transversal feminist theorists, particularly the recent work of Patricia Hill Collins (2017) that builds on Nira Yuval-Davis (1997) and others, to argue that political action is most effective when transversal practice is layered onto intersectional politics; and that, despite Hill Collins’ concern that political practice has yet to move to effective transversalism (2017, 1471), transversal feminist praxis can be found in examples of everyday politics which offer hope for social transformation.","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76045288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this collaborative paper, we bring the work of Billy-Ray Belcourt, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, Dionne Brand, and M. NourbeSe Philip into conversation in order to consider the concept of drift. Drawing on drift as both metaphor and methodology, we argue that drifting is not aimless or passive, as dictionary definitions suggest; rather, as a form of refusal, to follow the work of Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang (2014a, 2014b), it can be understood as resistance to colonial gestures of capture and containment. Inherently mobile, drift revels in inadvertent assemblages and volatile juxtapositions that reveal the artifice of the worlds we currently inhabit, in the process making new worlds possible. In this way, we suggest that drift is necessarily decolonial, in that it is premised on different ways of interacting among human, non-human, and more-than-human. Working through themes of intimacy, love, origins, dirt, and accountings, we argue that drift can be more productively read as an agential mode of kinning, making, and thinking together.
在这篇合作论文中，我们将比利-雷·贝尔库特、Leanne Betasamosake Simpson、Dionne Brand和M. NourbeSe Philip的工作带入对话，以考虑漂移的概念。将漂移作为隐喻和方法论，我们认为漂移不是无目的的或被动的，正如字典定义所暗示的那样;相反，作为一种拒绝的形式，按照Eve Tuck和K. Wayne Yang (2014a, 2014b)的工作，它可以被理解为对捕获和遏制的殖民姿态的抵抗。漂移本身就是移动的，它陶醉于不经意的组合和不稳定的并置，揭示了我们目前居住的世界的技巧，在这个过程中，新的世界成为可能。通过这种方式，我们认为漂移必然是非殖民化的，因为它是以人类、非人类和非人类之间的不同互动方式为前提的。通过研究亲密、爱、起源、肮脏和会计等主题，我们认为，漂移可以被更有效地解读为一种共同创造、创造和思考的代理模式。
{"title":"The Impossibility of a Future in the Absence of a Past: Drifting in the In-Between","authors":"Sonja Boon, K. Lahey","doi":"10.7202/1066419ar","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066419ar","url":null,"abstract":"In this collaborative paper, we bring the work of Billy-Ray Belcourt, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, Dionne Brand, and M. NourbeSe Philip into conversation in order to consider the concept of drift. Drawing on drift as both metaphor and methodology, we argue that drifting is not aimless or passive, as dictionary definitions suggest; rather, as a form of refusal, to follow the work of Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang (2014a, 2014b), it can be understood as resistance to colonial gestures of capture and containment. Inherently mobile, drift revels in inadvertent assemblages and volatile juxtapositions that reveal the artifice of the worlds we currently inhabit, in the process making new worlds possible. In this way, we suggest that drift is necessarily decolonial, in that it is premised on different ways of interacting among human, non-human, and more-than-human. Working through themes of intimacy, love, origins, dirt, and accountings, we argue that drift can be more productively read as an agential mode of kinning, making, and thinking together.","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88037165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article critically examines and compares adult male and female experiences selling sex in Canada’s off-street sex industry. Findings indicate that gender disparities exist when it comes to the work of selling sex: male providers are better insulated from violence and exploitation because of their gender, while female sex workers are forced to navigate multiple layers of oppression to assure safer working conditions. Despite these differences, this data suggests that prioritizing overarching labour issues, instead of gendered experiences working in commercial sex, can function to increase all sex workers’ safety and access to justice.
{"title":"Gender, Victimization, and Commercial Sex: A\u0000Comparative Study","authors":"Tamara O’Doherty, Ian B. Waters","doi":"10.7202/1066418ar","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066418ar","url":null,"abstract":"This article critically examines and compares adult male and female experiences selling sex in Canada’s off-street sex industry. Findings indicate that gender disparities exist when it comes to the work of selling sex: male providers are better insulated from violence and exploitation because of their gender, while female sex workers are forced to navigate multiple layers of oppression to assure safer working conditions. Despite these differences, this data suggests that prioritizing overarching labour issues, instead of gendered experiences working in commercial sex, can function to increase all sex workers’ safety and access to justice.","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79729035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Saleh, Muna. 2019. Stories We Live and Grow By: (Re)Telling Our experiences as Muslim Mothers and Daughters. Ontario, Canada: Demeter Press","authors":"Shirin Khayambashi","doi":"10.7202/1066421ar","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066421ar","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79135108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper critically examines the parallels of devaluation encountered by early childhood educators and sessional faculty members in Ontario as reflective praxis. The three authors’ experiences are diverse and include a tenured professor and two sessional faculty members, both ofwhom have worked in the field of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC). The narratives of the authors inform the concerning trend of precarity and devaluation embedded within two polarizing spectrums of the Ontario educational landscape: Post-Secondary Education (PSE) and ECEC. Although these aforementioned areas of education rarely intersect, the authors centre them on the frontline of the neoliberal assault on education transpiring in Ontario today. The three authors self-identify as female settlers; two have doctoral degrees; one has an MA and is an early childhood educator (ECE). One author self-identifies as a racialized and white-coded cis-gendered woman, and two selfidentify as white, cis-gendered women. All of the authors have worked in Ontario’s post-secondary landscape, one as sessional faculty member and then a tenured professor, and two as sessional faculty members. The paper will problematize the neoliberal assault on higher education and ECEC through a Feminist Political Economy (FPE) conceptual framework in order to draw on the multifaceted ways femAtlantis Journal Issue 40.1 /2019 46 inized discourses devalue the work of ECEs and perpetuate the overrepresentation of women, particularly racialized women in precarious faculty positions.
{"title":"Gender, Race, and Precarity: Theorizing the Parallels Between Early Childhood Educators and Sessional Faculty in Ontario","authors":"Zuhra E. Abawi, R. Berman, Alana Powell","doi":"10.7202/1066420ar","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066420ar","url":null,"abstract":"This paper critically examines the parallels of devaluation encountered by early childhood educators and sessional faculty members in Ontario as reflective praxis. The three authors’ experiences are diverse and include a tenured professor and two sessional faculty members, both ofwhom have worked in the field of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC). The narratives of the authors inform the concerning trend of precarity and devaluation embedded within two polarizing spectrums of the Ontario educational landscape: Post-Secondary Education (PSE) and ECEC. Although these aforementioned areas of education rarely intersect, the authors centre them on the frontline of the neoliberal assault on education transpiring in Ontario today. The three authors self-identify as female settlers; two have doctoral degrees; one has an MA and is an early childhood educator (ECE). One author self-identifies as a racialized and white-coded cis-gendered woman, and two selfidentify as white, cis-gendered women. All of the authors have worked in Ontario’s post-secondary landscape, one as sessional faculty member and then a tenured professor, and two as sessional faculty members. The paper will problematize the neoliberal assault on higher education and ECEC through a Feminist Political Economy (FPE) conceptual framework in order to draw on the multifaceted ways femAtlantis Journal Issue 40.1 /2019 46 inized discourses devalue the work of ECEs and perpetuate the overrepresentation of women, particularly racialized women in precarious faculty positions.","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"855 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84299067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Lee, Robyn. 2018. The Ethics and Politics of Breastfeeding. Power, Pleasure, Poetics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press","authors":"Cristina Díaz Pérez","doi":"10.7202/1066422ar","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1066422ar","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54082,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78436899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：