圆桌。不可能的任务?如何在德国和欧盟增加集体谈判的覆盖面

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1177/10242589221149513
Anke Hassel
{"title":"圆桌。不可能的任务?如何在德国和欧盟增加集体谈判的覆盖面","authors":"Anke Hassel","doi":"10.1177/10242589221149513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Directive on fair and adequate minimum wages represents a paradigm shift in EU economic governance. It marks a profound reorientation away from an economic growth strategy that priori-tises liberalisation of labour markets and decentralisation of collective bargaining, which has dom-inated the policy orientation of most EU Member States and the European Commission for at least 20 years. The Directive reinforces the governance and the level of statutory minimum wages in EU Member States. In a second step, the Directive requests that Member States support collective bargaining and find concrete measures to increase bargaining coverage for those countries where coverage is less than 80 per cent. This second aspect is just as relevant to the Directive and even more ambitious than the first. While statutory minimum wages are in the control of governments, collective bargaining is based on voluntary negotiations between trade unions and employers’ associations. The role of governments and public policy towards collective bargaining is limited and only indirect. In this comment I will focus on the latter aspect of increasing collective bargaining coverage, but will argue first that the wider picture of a changing EU growth strategy is important to understand the significance of the shift. I will, secondly, discuss ways of strengthening collective bargaining, with a focus on the German case.","PeriodicalId":23253,"journal":{"name":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","volume":"110 1","pages":"491 - 497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Round Table. Mission impossible? How to increase collective bargaining coverage in Germany and the EU\",\"authors\":\"Anke Hassel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10242589221149513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Directive on fair and adequate minimum wages represents a paradigm shift in EU economic governance. It marks a profound reorientation away from an economic growth strategy that priori-tises liberalisation of labour markets and decentralisation of collective bargaining, which has dom-inated the policy orientation of most EU Member States and the European Commission for at least 20 years. The Directive reinforces the governance and the level of statutory minimum wages in EU Member States. In a second step, the Directive requests that Member States support collective bargaining and find concrete measures to increase bargaining coverage for those countries where coverage is less than 80 per cent. This second aspect is just as relevant to the Directive and even more ambitious than the first. While statutory minimum wages are in the control of governments, collective bargaining is based on voluntary negotiations between trade unions and employers’ associations. The role of governments and public policy towards collective bargaining is limited and only indirect. In this comment I will focus on the latter aspect of increasing collective bargaining coverage, but will argue first that the wider picture of a changing EU growth strategy is important to understand the significance of the shift. I will, secondly, discuss ways of strengthening collective bargaining, with a focus on the German case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"491 - 497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221149513\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221149513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于公平和适当的最低工资的指令代表了欧盟经济治理的范式转变。它标志着一种深刻的重新定位,摆脱了优先考虑劳动力市场自由化和集体谈判权力分散的经济增长战略,这种战略主导了大多数欧盟成员国和欧盟委员会至少20年的政策取向。该指令加强了欧盟成员国的管理和法定最低工资水平。第二步,该指令要求会员国支持集体谈判,并找到具体措施,为那些谈判覆盖率低于80%的国家增加谈判覆盖率。这第二方面与该指令同样相关,甚至比第一个方面更具雄心。虽然法定最低工资由政府控制,但集体谈判是基于工会和雇主协会之间的自愿谈判。政府和公共政策对集体谈判的作用是有限的,而且只是间接的。在这篇评论中,我将重点关注增加集体谈判覆盖面的后一个方面,但首先要指出的是,欧盟增长战略变化的更广泛图景对于理解这一转变的意义很重要。其次,我将讨论加强集体谈判的方法,重点是德国的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Round Table. Mission impossible? How to increase collective bargaining coverage in Germany and the EU
The Directive on fair and adequate minimum wages represents a paradigm shift in EU economic governance. It marks a profound reorientation away from an economic growth strategy that priori-tises liberalisation of labour markets and decentralisation of collective bargaining, which has dom-inated the policy orientation of most EU Member States and the European Commission for at least 20 years. The Directive reinforces the governance and the level of statutory minimum wages in EU Member States. In a second step, the Directive requests that Member States support collective bargaining and find concrete measures to increase bargaining coverage for those countries where coverage is less than 80 per cent. This second aspect is just as relevant to the Directive and even more ambitious than the first. While statutory minimum wages are in the control of governments, collective bargaining is based on voluntary negotiations between trade unions and employers’ associations. The role of governments and public policy towards collective bargaining is limited and only indirect. In this comment I will focus on the latter aspect of increasing collective bargaining coverage, but will argue first that the wider picture of a changing EU growth strategy is important to understand the significance of the shift. I will, secondly, discuss ways of strengthening collective bargaining, with a focus on the German case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Governing neo-nationalism, trade unions and industrial relations: the cases of Hungary and Poland From a handful of activists towards an organising subculture: institutionalisation of transnational union organising in Central and Eastern Europe Round Table. Implementing the EU Directive on adequate minimum wages in the Low Countries: the case of the Netherlands Promoting employed worker status on digital platforms: how France’s labour inspection and social security agencies address ‘uberisation’ Internalising precariousness: experiences of Georgian platform workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1