俄罗斯女权主义标签运动中的话语激进主义:#ItIsNotAReasonToKill案

Q1 Social Sciences Russian Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2019-09-02 DOI:10.1080/19409419.2019.1679663
Elena Arbatskaya
{"title":"俄罗斯女权主义标签运动中的话语激进主义:#ItIsNotAReasonToKill案","authors":"Elena Arbatskaya","doi":"10.1080/19409419.2019.1679663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper describes a study of the feminist hashtag campaign against blaming victims #этонеповодубить (it is not a reason to kill), which was launched in the Russian social media in 2018. This article considers #этонеповодубить as a case of discursive activism and combines techniques of discourse analysis with network analysis to reveal how the participants in the temporary community were opposed to the victim-blaming discourse. The strategies of legitimization that the participants used to justify their opinions and the provocative style of the campaign were investigated based on Reyes’ classification. Visual network analysis and text analysis were facilitated by Netlytic.","PeriodicalId":53456,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Communication","volume":"83 1","pages":"253 - 273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discursive activism in the Russian feminist hashtag campaign: the #ItIsNotAReasonToKill case\",\"authors\":\"Elena Arbatskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19409419.2019.1679663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper describes a study of the feminist hashtag campaign against blaming victims #этонеповодубить (it is not a reason to kill), which was launched in the Russian social media in 2018. This article considers #этонеповодубить as a case of discursive activism and combines techniques of discourse analysis with network analysis to reveal how the participants in the temporary community were opposed to the victim-blaming discourse. The strategies of legitimization that the participants used to justify their opinions and the provocative style of the campaign were investigated based on Reyes’ classification. Visual network analysis and text analysis were facilitated by Netlytic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"253 - 273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2019.1679663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2019.1679663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文对2018年在俄罗斯社交媒体上发起的反对指责受害者#этонеповодубить(这不是杀人的理由)的女权主义标签运动进行了研究。本文将#этонеповодубить作为话语行动主义的案例,结合话语分析和网络分析的技术,揭示临时社区的参与者是如何反对受害者指责话语的。在雷耶斯分类的基础上,研究了参与者为证明自己的观点而使用的合法化策略和运动的挑衅风格。Netlytic为视觉网络分析和文本分析提供了便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discursive activism in the Russian feminist hashtag campaign: the #ItIsNotAReasonToKill case
ABSTRACT This paper describes a study of the feminist hashtag campaign against blaming victims #этонеповодубить (it is not a reason to kill), which was launched in the Russian social media in 2018. This article considers #этонеповодубить as a case of discursive activism and combines techniques of discourse analysis with network analysis to reveal how the participants in the temporary community were opposed to the victim-blaming discourse. The strategies of legitimization that the participants used to justify their opinions and the provocative style of the campaign were investigated based on Reyes’ classification. Visual network analysis and text analysis were facilitated by Netlytic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Communication
Russian Journal of Communication Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Communication (RJC) is an international peer-reviewed academic publication devoted to studies of communication in, with, and about Russia and Russian-speaking communities around the world. RJC welcomes both humanistic and social scientific scholarly approaches to communication, which is broadly construed to include mediated information as well as face-to-face interactions. RJC seeks papers and book reviews on topics including philosophy of communication, traditional and new media, film, literature, rhetoric, journalism, information-communication technologies, cultural practices, organizational and group dynamics, interpersonal communication, communication in instructional contexts, advertising, public relations, political campaigns, legal proceedings, environmental and health matters, and communication policy.
期刊最新文献
Hashtag activism in Russia: theory and practice Public agenda fragmentation beyond established democracies: the case of Russian online publics in 2017 Leaders of public opinion: political communication with youth in Russia during 2018–2019 Social semiotics: communicative and socio-cultural practices. The Russian-speaking contribution to the development of social semiotics in 1970–2000s Prejudice toward Asians and migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia and Kyrgyzstan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1