内镜在胃癌检测中的诊断作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY European History Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-05 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03172-2
Andrew Canakis, Shivanand Bomman, Benjamin Twery, Nevin Varghese, Byung Ji, Justin Canakis, Eric M Goldberg
{"title":"内镜在胃癌检测中的诊断作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Andrew Canakis, Shivanand Bomman, Benjamin Twery, Nevin Varghese, Byung Ji, Justin Canakis, Eric M Goldberg","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03172-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endocytoscopy (ECS) is an evolving technology that utilizes ultra-high power magnification for real time cellular imaging without the need for physical biopsy. Its application for gastric cancer (GC) detection is not well evaluated at the current time, but there is potential that ECS can make a real time histopathological diagnosis to differentiate neoplastic from benign lesions. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of ECS for GC detection.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Literature searches through multiple databases were performed for studies using ECS for GC detection until November 2021. Measured outcomes included the pooled sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Quality assessment of diagnostic studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Four studies (N.=245) were included. The pooled sensitivity was 83.5% (95% CI: 75-89%, I<sup>2</sup>: 0) and specificity was 91.7% (95% CI: 79-97%, I<sup>2</sup>: 58%). The pooled accuracy was 89.2% (95% CI: 83-94%, I<sup>2</sup>: 38%). There was a low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECS is an accurate diagnostic modality and has the potential to serve as a complimentary tool in screening for GC. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before its further widespread use.</p>","PeriodicalId":44713,"journal":{"name":"European History Quarterly","volume":"48 1","pages":"225-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic utility of endocytoscopy for the detection of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Canakis, Shivanand Bomman, Benjamin Twery, Nevin Varghese, Byung Ji, Justin Canakis, Eric M Goldberg\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03172-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endocytoscopy (ECS) is an evolving technology that utilizes ultra-high power magnification for real time cellular imaging without the need for physical biopsy. Its application for gastric cancer (GC) detection is not well evaluated at the current time, but there is potential that ECS can make a real time histopathological diagnosis to differentiate neoplastic from benign lesions. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of ECS for GC detection.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Literature searches through multiple databases were performed for studies using ECS for GC detection until November 2021. Measured outcomes included the pooled sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Quality assessment of diagnostic studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Four studies (N.=245) were included. The pooled sensitivity was 83.5% (95% CI: 75-89%, I<sup>2</sup>: 0) and specificity was 91.7% (95% CI: 79-97%, I<sup>2</sup>: 58%). The pooled accuracy was 89.2% (95% CI: 83-94%, I<sup>2</sup>: 38%). There was a low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECS is an accurate diagnostic modality and has the potential to serve as a complimentary tool in screening for GC. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before its further widespread use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European History Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"225-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European History Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03172-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European History Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03172-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:内细胞镜(ECS)是一种不断发展的技术,它利用超高倍放大技术进行实时细胞成像,而无需进行物理活检。目前,该技术在胃癌(GC)检测中的应用还没有得到很好的评估,但 ECS 有可能进行实时组织病理学诊断,以区分肿瘤和良性病变。我们的目的是研究 ECS 对胃癌检测的诊断效用:我们通过多个数据库检索了截至 2021 年 11 月使用 ECS 检测 GC 的研究文献。测量结果包括汇总灵敏度、特异性和准确性。诊断研究质量评估工具用于评估偏倚风险:结果:共纳入四项研究(n=245)。汇总灵敏度为 83.5%(95% CI:75% - 89%,I2:0),特异度为 91.7%(95% CI:79% - 97%,I2:58%)。汇总准确率为 89.2%(95% CI:83% - 94%,I2:38%)。偏倚风险较低:ECS是一种准确的诊断方式,有可能成为筛查GC的辅助工具。在进一步广泛使用之前,需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The diagnostic utility of endocytoscopy for the detection of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Endocytoscopy (ECS) is an evolving technology that utilizes ultra-high power magnification for real time cellular imaging without the need for physical biopsy. Its application for gastric cancer (GC) detection is not well evaluated at the current time, but there is potential that ECS can make a real time histopathological diagnosis to differentiate neoplastic from benign lesions. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of ECS for GC detection.

Evidence acquisition: Literature searches through multiple databases were performed for studies using ECS for GC detection until November 2021. Measured outcomes included the pooled sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Quality assessment of diagnostic studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias.

Evidence synthesis: Four studies (N.=245) were included. The pooled sensitivity was 83.5% (95% CI: 75-89%, I2: 0) and specificity was 91.7% (95% CI: 79-97%, I2: 58%). The pooled accuracy was 89.2% (95% CI: 83-94%, I2: 38%). There was a low risk of bias.

Conclusions: ECS is an accurate diagnostic modality and has the potential to serve as a complimentary tool in screening for GC. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before its further widespread use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: European History Quarterly has earned an international reputation as an essential resource on European history, publishing articles by eminent historians on a range of subjects from the later Middle Ages to post-1945. European History Quarterly also features review articles by leading authorities, offering a comprehensive survey of recent literature in a particular field, as well as an extensive book review section, enabling you to keep up to date with what"s being published in your field. The journal also features historiographical essays.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Behind the Wall: My Brother, My Family and Hatred in East Germany by Ines Geipel Book Review: The Maker of Pedigrees: Jakob Wilhelm Imhoff and the Meanings of Modern Genealogy in Early Modern Europe by Markus Friedrich Book Review: Publishing in Tsarist Russia: A History of Print Media from Enlightenment to Revolution by Yukiko Tatsumi and Taro Tsurumi, eds Book Review: Ensnared between Hitler and Stalin: Refugee Scientists in the USSR by David Zimmerman Book Review: A Badge of Injury: The Pink Triangle as Global Symbol of Memory by Sébastien Tremblay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1