伊朗-中国交易:伊朗向东看政策的一个插曲

Q3 Social Sciences Central Asia and the Caucasus Pub Date : 2021-08-27 DOI:10.54418/ca-88.2021-140
A. Rashid, Anjum Ghouri
{"title":"伊朗-中国交易:伊朗向东看政策的一个插曲","authors":"A. Rashid, Anjum Ghouri","doi":"10.54418/ca-88.2021-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Iran-China deal amid global power shifts from unipolarity to bipolarity suggests Iran’s counterbalancing vis-à-vis Western Powers, particularly U.S. as, the U.S. withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in May 2018 agreed upon on July 14, 2015, between Iran, the U.S., and its western allies. However, another view persists that Iran’s “Look to the East Policy” adopted back in 2005 was meant to strengthen relations with natural regional neighbors that seem a rational choice for Iran. This notion is somewhat true as ideological concerns became obsolete with the demise of the Soviet Union. Today’s foreign policy approach moves around the spatial(relates to geography) dimension as states cannot change their neighbors. Furthermore, it is in the mutual interest of the countries of the region as well. To understand the true essence of the Iran-China deal it is pivotal to understand the factual history and thorough understanding of Iran’s foreign policy on an ontological basis. Academicians gauge this deal from the prism of power balance or bandwagoning approach epistemologically, but this study uncovers the facts based on rational choice theory and its impacts on Iran.","PeriodicalId":53489,"journal":{"name":"Central Asia and the Caucasus","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iran – China Deal: An Episode of Iran’s Look to the East Policy\",\"authors\":\"A. Rashid, Anjum Ghouri\",\"doi\":\"10.54418/ca-88.2021-140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Iran-China deal amid global power shifts from unipolarity to bipolarity suggests Iran’s counterbalancing vis-à-vis Western Powers, particularly U.S. as, the U.S. withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in May 2018 agreed upon on July 14, 2015, between Iran, the U.S., and its western allies. However, another view persists that Iran’s “Look to the East Policy” adopted back in 2005 was meant to strengthen relations with natural regional neighbors that seem a rational choice for Iran. This notion is somewhat true as ideological concerns became obsolete with the demise of the Soviet Union. Today’s foreign policy approach moves around the spatial(relates to geography) dimension as states cannot change their neighbors. Furthermore, it is in the mutual interest of the countries of the region as well. To understand the true essence of the Iran-China deal it is pivotal to understand the factual history and thorough understanding of Iran’s foreign policy on an ontological basis. Academicians gauge this deal from the prism of power balance or bandwagoning approach epistemologically, but this study uncovers the facts based on rational choice theory and its impacts on Iran.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central Asia and the Caucasus\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central Asia and the Caucasus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-88.2021-140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asia and the Caucasus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-88.2021-140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球力量从单极向双极转变的背景下,伊朗与中国达成的协议表明,伊朗要制衡-à-vis西方大国,尤其是美国,因为美国于2018年5月退出了伊朗、美国及其西方盟友于2015年7月14日达成的《联合全面行动计划》(JCPOA)。然而,另一种观点坚持认为,伊朗2005年采取的“向东看政策”是为了加强与地区天然邻国的关系,这似乎是伊朗的理性选择。随着苏联的解体,意识形态方面的担忧变得过时了,这种观点在某种程度上是正确的。今天的外交政策是围绕空间(与地理有关)维度展开的,因为国家不能改变邻国。此外,这也符合本地区各国的共同利益。要理解伊中协议的真正本质,关键是要在本体论的基础上了解事实历史和对伊朗外交政策的透彻理解。学者们在认识论上从权力平衡或从众的角度来衡量这笔交易,但这项研究揭示了基于理性选择理论及其对伊朗的影响的事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Iran – China Deal: An Episode of Iran’s Look to the East Policy
Iran-China deal amid global power shifts from unipolarity to bipolarity suggests Iran’s counterbalancing vis-à-vis Western Powers, particularly U.S. as, the U.S. withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in May 2018 agreed upon on July 14, 2015, between Iran, the U.S., and its western allies. However, another view persists that Iran’s “Look to the East Policy” adopted back in 2005 was meant to strengthen relations with natural regional neighbors that seem a rational choice for Iran. This notion is somewhat true as ideological concerns became obsolete with the demise of the Soviet Union. Today’s foreign policy approach moves around the spatial(relates to geography) dimension as states cannot change their neighbors. Furthermore, it is in the mutual interest of the countries of the region as well. To understand the true essence of the Iran-China deal it is pivotal to understand the factual history and thorough understanding of Iran’s foreign policy on an ontological basis. Academicians gauge this deal from the prism of power balance or bandwagoning approach epistemologically, but this study uncovers the facts based on rational choice theory and its impacts on Iran.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central Asia and the Caucasus
Central Asia and the Caucasus Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Pakistan's Trade Opportunities and Challenges with CARs: Metaphor Used by the US as a Lethal Weapon of Mass Destruction against the Other for Pursuing Ulterior Motives Prohibition on Opium Poppy Cultivation in Afghanistan: Geo-Politics of Afghanistan under Taliban Regime: Pakistan and Central Asian Republics: Cooperation and Opportunities -Trade and Energy corridors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1