破坏党:反黑人态度,总统投票选择,以及白人选民的分裂投票

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics Groups and Identities Pub Date : 2021-12-13 DOI:10.1080/21565503.2021.2008991
Carrie LeVan, Stacey A. Greene
{"title":"破坏党:反黑人态度,总统投票选择,以及白人选民的分裂投票","authors":"Carrie LeVan, Stacey A. Greene","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2021.2008991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT American politics has entered, what Michael Tesler calls, a “most racial period,” causing racial attitudes to be increasingly salient. This shift provides an opportunity to examine the consequences to white Americans’ political behavior when their racial attitudes are easily activated. In this paper, we examine the influence of racial attitudes on (1) white Americans’ presidential vote choice and (2) how racial attitudes, in this period, may undercut the influence of partisanship on vote choice. We use data from the American National Election Studies Time Series Survey conducted from 2004 to 2020 to explore these questions. First, we find that anti-Black attitudes increasingly predict white vote choice. Next, we find that during this period, racially resentful, white Democrats became less likely to vote for the Democrat. This was not the same for white Republicans who, regardless of their racial attitudes, did not shift to the Democratic party. Finally, we find that white Republicans appear to hunker down and become significantly less likely to split their vote as they express more anti-Black attitudes. White Democrats become significantly more likely to jump ship as they endorse more anti-Black attitudes, revealing that racial attitudes were influential enough to overcome party loyalties during this period.","PeriodicalId":46590,"journal":{"name":"Politics Groups and Identities","volume":"22 1","pages":"526 - 548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undermining the party: anti-black attitudes, presidential vote choice, and split-ticket voting among white voters\",\"authors\":\"Carrie LeVan, Stacey A. Greene\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21565503.2021.2008991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT American politics has entered, what Michael Tesler calls, a “most racial period,” causing racial attitudes to be increasingly salient. This shift provides an opportunity to examine the consequences to white Americans’ political behavior when their racial attitudes are easily activated. In this paper, we examine the influence of racial attitudes on (1) white Americans’ presidential vote choice and (2) how racial attitudes, in this period, may undercut the influence of partisanship on vote choice. We use data from the American National Election Studies Time Series Survey conducted from 2004 to 2020 to explore these questions. First, we find that anti-Black attitudes increasingly predict white vote choice. Next, we find that during this period, racially resentful, white Democrats became less likely to vote for the Democrat. This was not the same for white Republicans who, regardless of their racial attitudes, did not shift to the Democratic party. Finally, we find that white Republicans appear to hunker down and become significantly less likely to split their vote as they express more anti-Black attitudes. White Democrats become significantly more likely to jump ship as they endorse more anti-Black attitudes, revealing that racial attitudes were influential enough to overcome party loyalties during this period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics Groups and Identities\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"526 - 548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics Groups and Identities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.2008991\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics Groups and Identities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.2008991","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国政治已经进入了Michael Tesler所说的“种族主义最严重的时期”,导致种族态度日益突出。这种转变提供了一个机会,可以研究当美国白人的种族态度很容易被激活时,对他们政治行为的影响。在本文中,我们研究了种族态度对(1)美国白人总统投票选择的影响,以及(2)在这一时期,种族态度如何削弱党派关系对投票选择的影响。我们使用2004年至2020年进行的美国全国选举研究时间序列调查的数据来探索这些问题。首先,我们发现反黑人态度越来越多地预测白人的投票选择。接下来,我们发现在这一时期,种族仇恨,白人民主党人不太可能投票给民主党人。对于白人共和党人来说,情况就不一样了,不管他们的种族态度如何,他们都没有转向民主党。最后,我们发现,白人共和党人似乎更低调,在表达更多反黑人态度时,他们分裂选票的可能性大大降低。白人民主党人更有可能跳槽,因为他们支持更多的反黑人态度,这表明种族态度在这一时期具有足够的影响力,足以克服对党派的忠诚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Undermining the party: anti-black attitudes, presidential vote choice, and split-ticket voting among white voters
ABSTRACT American politics has entered, what Michael Tesler calls, a “most racial period,” causing racial attitudes to be increasingly salient. This shift provides an opportunity to examine the consequences to white Americans’ political behavior when their racial attitudes are easily activated. In this paper, we examine the influence of racial attitudes on (1) white Americans’ presidential vote choice and (2) how racial attitudes, in this period, may undercut the influence of partisanship on vote choice. We use data from the American National Election Studies Time Series Survey conducted from 2004 to 2020 to explore these questions. First, we find that anti-Black attitudes increasingly predict white vote choice. Next, we find that during this period, racially resentful, white Democrats became less likely to vote for the Democrat. This was not the same for white Republicans who, regardless of their racial attitudes, did not shift to the Democratic party. Finally, we find that white Republicans appear to hunker down and become significantly less likely to split their vote as they express more anti-Black attitudes. White Democrats become significantly more likely to jump ship as they endorse more anti-Black attitudes, revealing that racial attitudes were influential enough to overcome party loyalties during this period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politics Groups and Identities
Politics Groups and Identities POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Viewers like you: the effect of elite co-identity reinforcement on U.S. immigration attitudes A nation of immigrants? The case for a politically influential and intersectional immigrant identity in the United States White candidate support continues amidst explicit and implicit white identity cues Envisioning a world without prisons: group concept mapping as a collective strategy for justice and dignity Trump’s African Americans? Racial resentment and Black support for Trump in the 2020 elections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1