印尼北苏门答腊传统与现代庞德小学阿拉伯文教材之比较研究

Cecep Farhani, Irfan Hania, Maksudin Maksudin, S. Suteja
{"title":"印尼北苏门答腊传统与现代庞德小学阿拉伯文教材之比较研究","authors":"Cecep Farhani, Irfan Hania, Maksudin Maksudin, S. Suteja","doi":"10.24090/insania.v28i1.6929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the Arabic materials in the traditional Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor and the Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah Darul Ulum in North Sumatera. It is qualitative descriptive and comparative field research. Observation, interviews, and documentation were utilized to collect data for this study. This study's validity is examined using a triangulation of data sources. Data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion are the three phases of the data analysis technique. This study’s data analysis is inductive, with the researcher actively seeking for data, examining, analyzing, interpreting, and deriving conclusions from the observed phenomena. This study indicates that traditional Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor and Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah Darul Ulum Arabic language learning materials have similarities and differences. In the form of qawā’id, the material aspect of anāśir al-lugah is comparable. The distinction is whether the Arabic material is taught through a program or not, and the learning outcomes that result. The Arabic language material on the mufradāt and aṣwāt learning aspects are not explicitly stated in the learning program at Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor as a traditional pondok pesantren, but the qawaid learning material aspect is the primary focus at Ponpes Al-Ansor. In terms of mufradāt and aṣwāt learning materials, Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah produces students with superior kalām and istimā’ skills. The qawā’id material aspect, meanwhile, is not a priority program because learning is limited to what is in the textbook.","PeriodicalId":33505,"journal":{"name":"INSANIA Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of arabic learning materials in traditional and modern pondok pesantren in North Sumatera, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Cecep Farhani, Irfan Hania, Maksudin Maksudin, S. Suteja\",\"doi\":\"10.24090/insania.v28i1.6929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to compare the Arabic materials in the traditional Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor and the Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah Darul Ulum in North Sumatera. It is qualitative descriptive and comparative field research. Observation, interviews, and documentation were utilized to collect data for this study. This study's validity is examined using a triangulation of data sources. Data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion are the three phases of the data analysis technique. This study’s data analysis is inductive, with the researcher actively seeking for data, examining, analyzing, interpreting, and deriving conclusions from the observed phenomena. This study indicates that traditional Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor and Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah Darul Ulum Arabic language learning materials have similarities and differences. In the form of qawā’id, the material aspect of anāśir al-lugah is comparable. The distinction is whether the Arabic material is taught through a program or not, and the learning outcomes that result. The Arabic language material on the mufradāt and aṣwāt learning aspects are not explicitly stated in the learning program at Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor as a traditional pondok pesantren, but the qawaid learning material aspect is the primary focus at Ponpes Al-Ansor. In terms of mufradāt and aṣwāt learning materials, Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah produces students with superior kalām and istimā’ skills. The qawā’id material aspect, meanwhile, is not a priority program because learning is limited to what is in the textbook.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INSANIA Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INSANIA Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v28i1.6929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSANIA Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v28i1.6929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较北苏门答腊传统的Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor和Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah Darul Ulum中的阿拉伯语材料。它是定性、描述性和比较性的实地研究。本研究采用观察法、访谈法和文献法收集资料。本研究的有效性是使用数据来源的三角测量来检验的。数据简化、数据表示和结论是数据分析技术的三个阶段。本研究的数据分析是归纳式的,研究者积极地寻找数据,对观察到的现象进行检验、分析、解释,并得出结论。本研究表明,传统的Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor和Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah Darul Ulum阿拉伯语学习材料既有异同之处。在qawwa ' id的形式中,anāśir al-lugah的物质方面是可比较的。区别在于阿拉伯语材料是否通过课程教授,以及由此产生的学习成果。在Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor的学习计划中,关于mufradāt和aṣwāt学习方面的阿拉伯语材料并没有作为传统的Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor的学习计划明确规定,但qawed学习材料方面是Ponpes Al-Ansor的主要重点。在mufradāt和aṣwāt学习材料方面,Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah培养的学生具有卓越的kalām和伊斯兰技能。与此同时,qawwa ' id的材料方面并不是一个优先项目,因为学习仅限于教科书上的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of arabic learning materials in traditional and modern pondok pesantren in North Sumatera, Indonesia
This study aims to compare the Arabic materials in the traditional Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor and the Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah Darul Ulum in North Sumatera. It is qualitative descriptive and comparative field research. Observation, interviews, and documentation were utilized to collect data for this study. This study's validity is examined using a triangulation of data sources. Data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion are the three phases of the data analysis technique. This study’s data analysis is inductive, with the researcher actively seeking for data, examining, analyzing, interpreting, and deriving conclusions from the observed phenomena. This study indicates that traditional Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor and Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah Darul Ulum Arabic language learning materials have similarities and differences. In the form of qawā’id, the material aspect of anāśir al-lugah is comparable. The distinction is whether the Arabic material is taught through a program or not, and the learning outcomes that result. The Arabic language material on the mufradāt and aṣwāt learning aspects are not explicitly stated in the learning program at Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor as a traditional pondok pesantren, but the qawaid learning material aspect is the primary focus at Ponpes Al-Ansor. In terms of mufradāt and aṣwāt learning materials, Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah produces students with superior kalām and istimā’ skills. The qawā’id material aspect, meanwhile, is not a priority program because learning is limited to what is in the textbook.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of mobile learning media using Smart Apps Creator on Economic subjects Kitab kuning’s existence in the history of Islamic education and its relevance to modern Islamic society in Aceh Internalization of tolerance value in thematic learning at Madrasah Ibtidaiyah The impact of TikTok videos in creative designs of house plans in civil technology’s practical assessment tasks The effect of usability, information quality, and accessibility on the intensity of the madrasa website use at Madrasah Aliyah level
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1