作为双赢承诺的蓬勃发展:帮助员工和组织蓬勃发展

D. Jamali, Cam Caldwell
{"title":"作为双赢承诺的蓬勃发展:帮助员工和组织蓬勃发展","authors":"D. Jamali, Cam Caldwell","doi":"10.5430/bmr.v12n3p21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of decision-making and problem solving is often ineffective because leaders and organizations fail to collaborate to pursue options that positively benefit all parties. This paper identifies five decision-making alternatives and describes their characteristics. It emphasizes the importance of the Win-Win decision philosophy advocated by Stephen R. Covey and identifies seven guidelines for implementing this approach to problem solving.","PeriodicalId":9554,"journal":{"name":"Business, Management and Economics Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thriving as a Win-Win Commitment: Helping Employees and Organizations to Flourish\",\"authors\":\"D. Jamali, Cam Caldwell\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/bmr.v12n3p21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The process of decision-making and problem solving is often ineffective because leaders and organizations fail to collaborate to pursue options that positively benefit all parties. This paper identifies five decision-making alternatives and describes their characteristics. It emphasizes the importance of the Win-Win decision philosophy advocated by Stephen R. Covey and identifies seven guidelines for implementing this approach to problem solving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business, Management and Economics Research\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business, Management and Economics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n3p21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business, Management and Economics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n3p21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

决策和解决问题的过程往往是无效的,因为领导者和组织未能合作寻求对各方都有利的选择。本文确定了五种决策方案,并描述了它们的特征。它强调了Stephen R. Covey倡导的双赢决策哲学的重要性,并确定了实施这种解决问题方法的七条指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thriving as a Win-Win Commitment: Helping Employees and Organizations to Flourish
The process of decision-making and problem solving is often ineffective because leaders and organizations fail to collaborate to pursue options that positively benefit all parties. This paper identifies five decision-making alternatives and describes their characteristics. It emphasizes the importance of the Win-Win decision philosophy advocated by Stephen R. Covey and identifies seven guidelines for implementing this approach to problem solving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spiritual Intelligence and Its Practical Importance – Insights from Islam Challenges in the Receiving and Inspection of Supplies & Equipment in an International Organization in West Africa Sustainability Leadership and Ethical Perspectives College Students’ Purchase Intention for Counterfeit Sport Shoes Leadership, Commitment, and the Failure of Trust – What Companies Must Do to Thrive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1