环孢素A在儿童Alport综合征中的应用效果:单中心研究

K. V. Shebalkina, E. Petrosyan, P. Shumilov
{"title":"环孢素A在儿童Alport综合征中的应用效果:单中心研究","authors":"K. V. Shebalkina, E. Petrosyan, P. Shumilov","doi":"10.36485/1561-6274-2022-26-4-66-73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Alport syndrome is a non-immune genetically determined glomerulopathy caused by mutation of genes encoding α3-5 chains of collagen type IV of the basement membranes. It manifests with hematuria and/or proteinuria, progressive renal functions decrease, often in combination with hearing and vision pathology. According to world statistics the incidence of Alport syndrome is less than 1:5000 people. THE AIM: We analyzed the effectiveness of combined Cyclosporine A and nephroprotective therapy in children with Alport syndrome in comparison with nephroprotectors only. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 35 patients were enrolled in retrospective controlled comparative non-randomized single-center longitudinal study: 9 girls (26 %) and 26 boys (74 %). The median age Me was 8,7 [5,4; 13,7] years old. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=25) – patients receiving Cyclosporine A and nephroprotective therapy, group 2 (n=10) – patients receiving nephroprotective therapy only. The groups did not differ statistically significantly. The observation period was 24 months. The effectiveness of therapy was assessed by reducing proteinuria. RESULTS: In group 1, the level of proteinuria decreased significantly, especially in the first 6 months. Despite gradual increase in the level of proteinuria in this group, by 24 months of follow-up, there was statistically significant difference compared to baseline (1872.0 [1195.0; 2531.0] vs 805.0 [306.0; 1504.0]; p=0.0005). Use of nephroprotectors did not change significantly the dynamics of proteinuria. In general, after 2 years, the level of proteinuria remained practically the same (1812.0 [1508.0; 2093.0] vs 1080.0 [147.0; 3141.0]; p = 0.11). Glomerular filtration rate in two groups did not change significantly during the observation period: in group 1 – 133 [108; 146] vs 123 [106; 131]; p=0.1 and in group 2 – 124 [64; 133] vs 81 [40; 102]; p=0.18. CONCLUSION: The relative safety and efficacy of combined use of Cyclosporine A in low doses and nephroprotectors was shown in children with Alport syndrome with nephrotic proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate > 60 ml/min/1.73m2, if monocomponent nephroprotective therapy was ineffective.","PeriodicalId":19089,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg)","volume":"275 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of Cyclosporine A use in children with Alport syndrome: single center study\",\"authors\":\"K. V. Shebalkina, E. Petrosyan, P. Shumilov\",\"doi\":\"10.36485/1561-6274-2022-26-4-66-73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Alport syndrome is a non-immune genetically determined glomerulopathy caused by mutation of genes encoding α3-5 chains of collagen type IV of the basement membranes. It manifests with hematuria and/or proteinuria, progressive renal functions decrease, often in combination with hearing and vision pathology. According to world statistics the incidence of Alport syndrome is less than 1:5000 people. THE AIM: We analyzed the effectiveness of combined Cyclosporine A and nephroprotective therapy in children with Alport syndrome in comparison with nephroprotectors only. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 35 patients were enrolled in retrospective controlled comparative non-randomized single-center longitudinal study: 9 girls (26 %) and 26 boys (74 %). The median age Me was 8,7 [5,4; 13,7] years old. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=25) – patients receiving Cyclosporine A and nephroprotective therapy, group 2 (n=10) – patients receiving nephroprotective therapy only. The groups did not differ statistically significantly. The observation period was 24 months. The effectiveness of therapy was assessed by reducing proteinuria. RESULTS: In group 1, the level of proteinuria decreased significantly, especially in the first 6 months. Despite gradual increase in the level of proteinuria in this group, by 24 months of follow-up, there was statistically significant difference compared to baseline (1872.0 [1195.0; 2531.0] vs 805.0 [306.0; 1504.0]; p=0.0005). Use of nephroprotectors did not change significantly the dynamics of proteinuria. In general, after 2 years, the level of proteinuria remained practically the same (1812.0 [1508.0; 2093.0] vs 1080.0 [147.0; 3141.0]; p = 0.11). Glomerular filtration rate in two groups did not change significantly during the observation period: in group 1 – 133 [108; 146] vs 123 [106; 131]; p=0.1 and in group 2 – 124 [64; 133] vs 81 [40; 102]; p=0.18. CONCLUSION: The relative safety and efficacy of combined use of Cyclosporine A in low doses and nephroprotectors was shown in children with Alport syndrome with nephrotic proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate > 60 ml/min/1.73m2, if monocomponent nephroprotective therapy was ineffective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg)\",\"volume\":\"275 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36485/1561-6274-2022-26-4-66-73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology (Saint-Petersburg)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36485/1561-6274-2022-26-4-66-73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Alport综合征是一种非免疫遗传决定的肾小球病变,由编码基底膜α3-5型胶原链的基因突变引起。表现为血尿和/或蛋白尿,进行性肾功能下降,常伴有听觉和视觉病变。据世界统计,阿尔波特综合征的发病率不到50 000人。目的:我们分析环孢素A联合肾保护治疗儿童Alport综合征的有效性,并与单独使用肾保护药物进行比较。患者和方法:35例患者纳入回顾性对照比较非随机单中心纵向研究:9例女孩(26%)和26例男孩(74%)。中位年龄为8、7岁[5、4岁;[13,7]岁。患者分为两组。组1 (n=25) -接受环孢素A和肾保护治疗的患者,组2 (n=10) -仅接受肾保护治疗的患者。两组间差异无统计学意义。观察期24个月。通过减少蛋白尿来评估治疗的有效性。结果:1组患者蛋白尿水平明显下降,且以治疗前6个月下降最为明显。尽管该组蛋白尿水平逐渐升高,但随访24个月后,与基线相比仍有统计学差异(1872.0 [1195.0;2531.0] vs 805.0 [306.0;1504.0);p = 0.0005)。肾保护剂的使用并没有显著改变蛋白尿的动态。总的来说,2年后,蛋白尿水平基本保持不变(1812.0 [1508.0;2093.0] vs 1080.0 [147.0;3141.0);P = 0.11)。两组患者的肾小球滤过率在观察期内无明显变化:1 ~ 133组[108;[146] vs [106;131);P =0.1, 2 ~ 124组[64;[133] vs . 81 [40;102);p = 0.18。结论:在单组份肾保护治疗无效的Alport综合征肾病蛋白尿、肾小球滤过率> 60 ml/min/1.73m2患儿中,低剂量环孢素A与肾保护药物联合应用具有相对安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of Cyclosporine A use in children with Alport syndrome: single center study
BACKGROUND: Alport syndrome is a non-immune genetically determined glomerulopathy caused by mutation of genes encoding α3-5 chains of collagen type IV of the basement membranes. It manifests with hematuria and/or proteinuria, progressive renal functions decrease, often in combination with hearing and vision pathology. According to world statistics the incidence of Alport syndrome is less than 1:5000 people. THE AIM: We analyzed the effectiveness of combined Cyclosporine A and nephroprotective therapy in children with Alport syndrome in comparison with nephroprotectors only. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 35 patients were enrolled in retrospective controlled comparative non-randomized single-center longitudinal study: 9 girls (26 %) and 26 boys (74 %). The median age Me was 8,7 [5,4; 13,7] years old. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=25) – patients receiving Cyclosporine A and nephroprotective therapy, group 2 (n=10) – patients receiving nephroprotective therapy only. The groups did not differ statistically significantly. The observation period was 24 months. The effectiveness of therapy was assessed by reducing proteinuria. RESULTS: In group 1, the level of proteinuria decreased significantly, especially in the first 6 months. Despite gradual increase in the level of proteinuria in this group, by 24 months of follow-up, there was statistically significant difference compared to baseline (1872.0 [1195.0; 2531.0] vs 805.0 [306.0; 1504.0]; p=0.0005). Use of nephroprotectors did not change significantly the dynamics of proteinuria. In general, after 2 years, the level of proteinuria remained practically the same (1812.0 [1508.0; 2093.0] vs 1080.0 [147.0; 3141.0]; p = 0.11). Glomerular filtration rate in two groups did not change significantly during the observation period: in group 1 – 133 [108; 146] vs 123 [106; 131]; p=0.1 and in group 2 – 124 [64; 133] vs 81 [40; 102]; p=0.18. CONCLUSION: The relative safety and efficacy of combined use of Cyclosporine A in low doses and nephroprotectors was shown in children with Alport syndrome with nephrotic proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate > 60 ml/min/1.73m2, if monocomponent nephroprotective therapy was ineffective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The concentration of P-selectin in the blood serum of patients with chronic kidney disease Nutritional disorders and survival rate of elderly and geriatric patients with CKD 3B-5 stage Clinical signifi cance of various variants of euthyroid pathology syndrome in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease on programmed hemodialysis Features of the course of the new coronavirus infection COVID-19 in patients with chronic kidney disease Role of urinary tract microbiota and urine proteome in urolithiasis pathogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1