在中非合作下加强疟疾和血吸虫病控制能力建设:评估布基纳法索的案例研究

Hong-Mei Li , Diakourga Arthur Djibougou , Shen-Ning Lu , Shan Lv , Dramane Zongo , Duo-Quan Wang , Wei Ding , Ying-Jun Qian , Lu-Lu Huang , Ya-Yi Guan , Ning Xiao , Potiandi Serge Diagbouga , Dirk Engels , Xiao-Nong Zhou
{"title":"在中非合作下加强疟疾和血吸虫病控制能力建设:评估布基纳法索的案例研究","authors":"Hong-Mei Li ,&nbsp;Diakourga Arthur Djibougou ,&nbsp;Shen-Ning Lu ,&nbsp;Shan Lv ,&nbsp;Dramane Zongo ,&nbsp;Duo-Quan Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Ding ,&nbsp;Ying-Jun Qian ,&nbsp;Lu-Lu Huang ,&nbsp;Ya-Yi Guan ,&nbsp;Ning Xiao ,&nbsp;Potiandi Serge Diagbouga ,&nbsp;Dirk Engels ,&nbsp;Xiao-Nong Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.soh.2023.100009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Malaria and schistosomiasis are highly prevalent in Burkina Faso, whereas China has successfully eliminated malaria as well as schistosomiasis as a public health problem. To implement the China-Africa health cooperation initiative, a series of activities were launched since 2019 to enhance understanding and cooperation among malaria and schistosomiasis professionals in China and Burkina Faso. This study described the achievements of the First Virtual Symposium of China-Burkina Faso Cooperation on Schistosomiasis and Malaria Control. Pre- and post-test questionnaires were employed to study the knowledge changes of participants regarding malaria and schistosomiasis control and elimination, explore capacity-building priorities, and identify potential challenges. Chi-squared statistics were used to compare the differences between sub-groups, and <em>p</em> value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Participants ranked their preferences for challenges and capacity-building priorities in future cooperation. The responses of participants from both China and Burkina Faso indicated effective improvement in their general knowledge about the diseases whereas the improvement in professional knowledge on malaria and schistosomiasis was limited. The total correct response rate increased from 54.08% to 66.78%. Chinese participants had better schistosomiasis knowledge than Burkina Faso participants did, but the same result was not found for malaria. Diseases control strategies, surveillance and response system, and diagnostics techniques were identified as the top three priorities for future capacity building. Participants from China and Burkina Faso shared almost the same views about challenges except with respect to pathogens, which the former saw as a major challenge and the latter did not. The study findings will help policymakers, health managers, and researchers to understand the future cooperation between Burkina Faso and China on malaria and schistosomiasis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101146,"journal":{"name":"Science in One Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704323000033/pdfft?md5=aecf5be37d3b92adafd934cf36542723&pid=1-s2.0-S2949704323000033-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthening capacity-building in malaria and schistosomiasis control under China-Africa cooperation: Assessing a case study of Burkina Faso\",\"authors\":\"Hong-Mei Li ,&nbsp;Diakourga Arthur Djibougou ,&nbsp;Shen-Ning Lu ,&nbsp;Shan Lv ,&nbsp;Dramane Zongo ,&nbsp;Duo-Quan Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Ding ,&nbsp;Ying-Jun Qian ,&nbsp;Lu-Lu Huang ,&nbsp;Ya-Yi Guan ,&nbsp;Ning Xiao ,&nbsp;Potiandi Serge Diagbouga ,&nbsp;Dirk Engels ,&nbsp;Xiao-Nong Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soh.2023.100009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Malaria and schistosomiasis are highly prevalent in Burkina Faso, whereas China has successfully eliminated malaria as well as schistosomiasis as a public health problem. To implement the China-Africa health cooperation initiative, a series of activities were launched since 2019 to enhance understanding and cooperation among malaria and schistosomiasis professionals in China and Burkina Faso. This study described the achievements of the First Virtual Symposium of China-Burkina Faso Cooperation on Schistosomiasis and Malaria Control. Pre- and post-test questionnaires were employed to study the knowledge changes of participants regarding malaria and schistosomiasis control and elimination, explore capacity-building priorities, and identify potential challenges. Chi-squared statistics were used to compare the differences between sub-groups, and <em>p</em> value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Participants ranked their preferences for challenges and capacity-building priorities in future cooperation. The responses of participants from both China and Burkina Faso indicated effective improvement in their general knowledge about the diseases whereas the improvement in professional knowledge on malaria and schistosomiasis was limited. The total correct response rate increased from 54.08% to 66.78%. Chinese participants had better schistosomiasis knowledge than Burkina Faso participants did, but the same result was not found for malaria. Diseases control strategies, surveillance and response system, and diagnostics techniques were identified as the top three priorities for future capacity building. Participants from China and Burkina Faso shared almost the same views about challenges except with respect to pathogens, which the former saw as a major challenge and the latter did not. The study findings will help policymakers, health managers, and researchers to understand the future cooperation between Burkina Faso and China on malaria and schistosomiasis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science in One Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704323000033/pdfft?md5=aecf5be37d3b92adafd934cf36542723&pid=1-s2.0-S2949704323000033-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science in One Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704323000033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704323000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

疟疾和血吸虫病在布基纳法索非常普遍,而中国已经成功地消除了作为公共卫生问题的疟疾和血吸虫病。为落实中非卫生合作倡议,2019年以来开展了一系列活动,增进中布两国疟疾和血吸虫病专业人员的了解与合作。本研究描述了首届中国-布基纳法索血吸虫病和疟疾防治合作网络研讨会的成果。采用测试前和测试后问卷调查,研究参与者对疟疾和血吸虫病控制和消除的知识变化,探讨能力建设重点,识别潜在挑战。亚组间差异比较采用卡方统计,p值<0.05认为有统计学意义。与会代表对未来合作面临的挑战和能力建设重点进行了排序。来自中国和布基纳法索的与会者的答复表明,他们对这两种疾病的一般知识有了有效的提高,而关于疟疾和血吸虫病的专业知识的提高有限。总正确率由54.08%提高到66.78%。中国参与者比布基纳法索参与者对血吸虫病有更好的了解,但在疟疾方面没有发现相同的结果。疾病控制战略、监测和反应系统以及诊断技术被确定为未来能力建设的三大优先事项。来自中国和布基纳法索的与会者对挑战的看法几乎相同,除了病原体,前者认为这是一个重大挑战,而后者不认为。这项研究的发现将有助于决策者、卫生管理人员和研究人员了解布基纳法索和中国在疟疾和血吸虫病方面的未来合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strengthening capacity-building in malaria and schistosomiasis control under China-Africa cooperation: Assessing a case study of Burkina Faso

Malaria and schistosomiasis are highly prevalent in Burkina Faso, whereas China has successfully eliminated malaria as well as schistosomiasis as a public health problem. To implement the China-Africa health cooperation initiative, a series of activities were launched since 2019 to enhance understanding and cooperation among malaria and schistosomiasis professionals in China and Burkina Faso. This study described the achievements of the First Virtual Symposium of China-Burkina Faso Cooperation on Schistosomiasis and Malaria Control. Pre- and post-test questionnaires were employed to study the knowledge changes of participants regarding malaria and schistosomiasis control and elimination, explore capacity-building priorities, and identify potential challenges. Chi-squared statistics were used to compare the differences between sub-groups, and p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Participants ranked their preferences for challenges and capacity-building priorities in future cooperation. The responses of participants from both China and Burkina Faso indicated effective improvement in their general knowledge about the diseases whereas the improvement in professional knowledge on malaria and schistosomiasis was limited. The total correct response rate increased from 54.08% to 66.78%. Chinese participants had better schistosomiasis knowledge than Burkina Faso participants did, but the same result was not found for malaria. Diseases control strategies, surveillance and response system, and diagnostics techniques were identified as the top three priorities for future capacity building. Participants from China and Burkina Faso shared almost the same views about challenges except with respect to pathogens, which the former saw as a major challenge and the latter did not. The study findings will help policymakers, health managers, and researchers to understand the future cooperation between Burkina Faso and China on malaria and schistosomiasis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern technologies and solutions to enhance surveillance and response systems for emerging zoonotic diseases Dietary exposure assessment of perchlorate and chlorate in infant formulas marketed in Shanghai, China Irrational use of colistin sulfate in poultry and domestic animals in Nepal-an emerging public health crisis How far has the globe gone in achieving One Health? Current evidence and policy implications based on global One Health index Microbiome One Health model for a healthy ecosystem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1