听力损失儿童和青少年的执行功能:对病例对照、病例系列和横断面研究的系统回顾

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Salud Mental Pub Date : 2022-01-26 DOI:10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2022.006
Jesús David Charry-Sánchez, Sofía Ramírez-Guerrero, María Paula Vargas-Cuellar, M. Romero-Gordillo, C. Talero-Gutiérrez
{"title":"听力损失儿童和青少年的执行功能:对病例对照、病例系列和横断面研究的系统回顾","authors":"Jesús David Charry-Sánchez, Sofía Ramírez-Guerrero, María Paula Vargas-Cuellar, M. Romero-Gordillo, C. Talero-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2022.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Children with hearing loss have been reported to perform lower in executive function and language tasks than their normal-hearing peers. Objective. To describe EF performance profile in children and adolescents with hearing loss. Method. Using different databases including PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, we conducted a systematic review of case-control, cross-sectional studies, and case series that evaluated executive function performance in children and adolescents with hearing loss with or without hearing aids, cochlear implants, and/or native sign language, since 2000 until April 2020. Fifteen studies were selected after quality assessment using Critical Appraisal Tools provided by Joanna Briggs Institute. Results. The studies differed in the assessment tools, and the results obtained by different authors were inconsistent. However, these studies revealed that children and adolescents with hearing impairment have lower performance in working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and attention than their normal-hearing peers. Discussion and conclusion. Executive function assessment tools are used indistinctively for both children with and without hearing loss. Consequently, as tools were designed for normal hearing population, results can significantly vary in the population with hearing impairment. Hence, it is important to establish a standardized protocol specifically adapted for this population.","PeriodicalId":46510,"journal":{"name":"Salud Mental","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Executive functions in children and adolescents with hearing loss: A systematic review of case-control, case series, and cross-sectional studies\",\"authors\":\"Jesús David Charry-Sánchez, Sofía Ramírez-Guerrero, María Paula Vargas-Cuellar, M. Romero-Gordillo, C. Talero-Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2022.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Children with hearing loss have been reported to perform lower in executive function and language tasks than their normal-hearing peers. Objective. To describe EF performance profile in children and adolescents with hearing loss. Method. Using different databases including PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, we conducted a systematic review of case-control, cross-sectional studies, and case series that evaluated executive function performance in children and adolescents with hearing loss with or without hearing aids, cochlear implants, and/or native sign language, since 2000 until April 2020. Fifteen studies were selected after quality assessment using Critical Appraisal Tools provided by Joanna Briggs Institute. Results. The studies differed in the assessment tools, and the results obtained by different authors were inconsistent. However, these studies revealed that children and adolescents with hearing impairment have lower performance in working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and attention than their normal-hearing peers. Discussion and conclusion. Executive function assessment tools are used indistinctively for both children with and without hearing loss. Consequently, as tools were designed for normal hearing population, results can significantly vary in the population with hearing impairment. Hence, it is important to establish a standardized protocol specifically adapted for this population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Salud Mental\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Salud Mental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2022.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Mental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2022.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

介绍。据报道,听力损失的儿童在执行功能和语言任务方面的表现低于听力正常的同龄人。目标。描述听力损失儿童和青少年的EF表现。方法。使用不同的数据库,包括PubMed、Scopus和ScienceDirect,我们对病例对照、横断面研究和病例系列进行了系统回顾,这些研究评估了自2000年至2020年4月期间听力损失的儿童和青少年在使用或不使用助听器、人工耳蜗和/或母语手语的情况下的执行功能表现。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所提供的关键评估工具进行质量评估后,选择了15项研究。结果。这些研究的评估工具不同,不同作者得出的结果也不一致。然而,这些研究表明,听力障碍儿童和青少年在工作记忆、抑制、认知灵活性和注意力方面的表现低于听力正常的同龄人。讨论与结论。执行功能评估工具在有听力损失和没有听力损失的儿童中没有区别地使用。因此,由于工具是为听力正常人群设计的,结果在听力障碍人群中可能会有显著差异。因此,建立一个专门适用于这一人群的标准化方案是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Executive functions in children and adolescents with hearing loss: A systematic review of case-control, case series, and cross-sectional studies
Introduction. Children with hearing loss have been reported to perform lower in executive function and language tasks than their normal-hearing peers. Objective. To describe EF performance profile in children and adolescents with hearing loss. Method. Using different databases including PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, we conducted a systematic review of case-control, cross-sectional studies, and case series that evaluated executive function performance in children and adolescents with hearing loss with or without hearing aids, cochlear implants, and/or native sign language, since 2000 until April 2020. Fifteen studies were selected after quality assessment using Critical Appraisal Tools provided by Joanna Briggs Institute. Results. The studies differed in the assessment tools, and the results obtained by different authors were inconsistent. However, these studies revealed that children and adolescents with hearing impairment have lower performance in working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and attention than their normal-hearing peers. Discussion and conclusion. Executive function assessment tools are used indistinctively for both children with and without hearing loss. Consequently, as tools were designed for normal hearing population, results can significantly vary in the population with hearing impairment. Hence, it is important to establish a standardized protocol specifically adapted for this population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Salud Mental
Salud Mental PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Salud Mental receives original manuscripts dealing with various mental health-related topics (such as psychiatry, neurosciences, psychology, epidemiology, and addictions). The submission of a manuscript must be exclusively carried out through this website.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of suicide mortality in Mexican young people (ages 15-29) from 1990 to 2020 Mexico at the United Nations: A step forward for mental health Clinical practice stressors and anxiety in nursing students during COVID-19 Emotional distress and self-care during the COVID-19 pandemic in women from an indigenous migrant cultural collective in Mexico City Is there interest of Mexican adults in being prepared should they develop Alzheimer’s or other dementia?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1