拟议的石油工业财政法案PIFB, 2018年税收计划对尼日利亚石油生产经济的影响

Bariture Nyoor, Adeogun Oyebimpe, O. Iledare
{"title":"拟议的石油工业财政法案PIFB, 2018年税收计划对尼日利亚石油生产经济的影响","authors":"Bariture Nyoor, Adeogun Oyebimpe, O. Iledare","doi":"10.2118/198782-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Revenue from petroleum operations remains the most important contributor to government expenditures in Nigeria. Hence, the onus is on the central government to design fiscal regime that would maximize economic rents to the nation. The Petroleum Industry Fiscal Bill (PIFB) of 2018 seems to be the awaited bill that may satisfy the economic objectives of the Nigerian government. PIFB 2018 proposes the replacement of the default petroleum profit tax with single tax system, petroleum income tax and additional petroleum income tax to cater for windfall profits. This research uses deterministic spreadsheet approach to evaluate the impacts of this new tax scheme on the profitability of oil ventures in Nigerian deep-water production sharing contracts. The deterministic results were subjected to Monte Carlo Simulation using Crystal Ball Risk analysis software to account for risks and uncertainties inherent in the business. The typical project examined under PIFB (2018) generated a positive Net Present Value (NPV) of MM$595.18, an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 23.7% which is higher than opportunity cost of capital, Profitability Index (PI) of 1.34, Contractor take of 11.9% and Host Government take of 88.1%. All evaluated indicators gave positive results meaning that investments under this new fiscal regime will be profitable giving the government higher take as compared to the current regime. The results also show that the contractor take can increase to as high as 25% taking advantage of Reserves Replacement Ratio (RRR) tied to additional production allowance. The bill however, does not explicitly state the conditions for cost recovery limit and profit oil sharing, as such could create a lot concerns to investors and may also hamper investment in the industry. Hence, the bill should be reviewed before passage into law.","PeriodicalId":11250,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of the Proposed Petroleum Industry Fiscal Bill PIFB, 2018 Tax Scheme on the Economics of Oil Production in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Bariture Nyoor, Adeogun Oyebimpe, O. Iledare\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/198782-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Revenue from petroleum operations remains the most important contributor to government expenditures in Nigeria. Hence, the onus is on the central government to design fiscal regime that would maximize economic rents to the nation. The Petroleum Industry Fiscal Bill (PIFB) of 2018 seems to be the awaited bill that may satisfy the economic objectives of the Nigerian government. PIFB 2018 proposes the replacement of the default petroleum profit tax with single tax system, petroleum income tax and additional petroleum income tax to cater for windfall profits. This research uses deterministic spreadsheet approach to evaluate the impacts of this new tax scheme on the profitability of oil ventures in Nigerian deep-water production sharing contracts. The deterministic results were subjected to Monte Carlo Simulation using Crystal Ball Risk analysis software to account for risks and uncertainties inherent in the business. The typical project examined under PIFB (2018) generated a positive Net Present Value (NPV) of MM$595.18, an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 23.7% which is higher than opportunity cost of capital, Profitability Index (PI) of 1.34, Contractor take of 11.9% and Host Government take of 88.1%. All evaluated indicators gave positive results meaning that investments under this new fiscal regime will be profitable giving the government higher take as compared to the current regime. The results also show that the contractor take can increase to as high as 25% taking advantage of Reserves Replacement Ratio (RRR) tied to additional production allowance. The bill however, does not explicitly state the conditions for cost recovery limit and profit oil sharing, as such could create a lot concerns to investors and may also hamper investment in the industry. Hence, the bill should be reviewed before passage into law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/198782-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198782-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

石油业务收入仍然是尼日利亚政府支出的最重要来源。因此,中央政府有责任设计财政制度,使国家的经济租金最大化。2018年的石油工业财政法案(PIFB)似乎是人们期待已久的法案,可以满足尼日利亚政府的经济目标。PIFB 2018建议用单一税制,石油所得税和额外的石油所得税取代默认的石油利得税,以满足暴利。本研究使用确定性电子表格方法来评估这一新税收方案对尼日利亚深水生产分成合同中石油企业盈利能力的影响。确定性结果使用水晶球风险分析软件进行蒙特卡罗模拟,以说明业务中固有的风险和不确定性。根据PIFB(2018)审查的典型项目产生了595.18 MM的正净现值(NPV),内部收益率(IRR)为23.7%,高于资本机会成本,盈利指数(PI)为1.34,承包商收益为11.9%,东道国政府收益为88.1%。所有评估的指标都给出了积极的结果,这意味着在新的财政制度下的投资将是有利可图的,与现行制度相比,政府将获得更高的收益。结果还表明,利用与额外生产津贴相关的储量替代率(RRR),承包商的采收率可以提高到25%。然而,该法案并没有明确规定成本回收限制和利润分成的条件,这可能会给投资者带来很多担忧,也可能阻碍该行业的投资。因此,该法案在成为法律之前应该进行审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of the Proposed Petroleum Industry Fiscal Bill PIFB, 2018 Tax Scheme on the Economics of Oil Production in Nigeria
Revenue from petroleum operations remains the most important contributor to government expenditures in Nigeria. Hence, the onus is on the central government to design fiscal regime that would maximize economic rents to the nation. The Petroleum Industry Fiscal Bill (PIFB) of 2018 seems to be the awaited bill that may satisfy the economic objectives of the Nigerian government. PIFB 2018 proposes the replacement of the default petroleum profit tax with single tax system, petroleum income tax and additional petroleum income tax to cater for windfall profits. This research uses deterministic spreadsheet approach to evaluate the impacts of this new tax scheme on the profitability of oil ventures in Nigerian deep-water production sharing contracts. The deterministic results were subjected to Monte Carlo Simulation using Crystal Ball Risk analysis software to account for risks and uncertainties inherent in the business. The typical project examined under PIFB (2018) generated a positive Net Present Value (NPV) of MM$595.18, an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 23.7% which is higher than opportunity cost of capital, Profitability Index (PI) of 1.34, Contractor take of 11.9% and Host Government take of 88.1%. All evaluated indicators gave positive results meaning that investments under this new fiscal regime will be profitable giving the government higher take as compared to the current regime. The results also show that the contractor take can increase to as high as 25% taking advantage of Reserves Replacement Ratio (RRR) tied to additional production allowance. The bill however, does not explicitly state the conditions for cost recovery limit and profit oil sharing, as such could create a lot concerns to investors and may also hamper investment in the industry. Hence, the bill should be reviewed before passage into law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Macroeconomic, Sectoral and Distributional Impact of Gas Monetization Policy in Nigeria: A CGE Application Occupational deaths from Similar Causes; Why? Production Restoration Through Innovative Sourcing of Lift Gas - Jacket X Case Study Experimental Investigation of the Macroscopic Displacement Efficiency of Locally Sourced Locust Bean Gum and Gum Arabic The Effect of Monovalent and Divalent Ions on Biodegradable Polymers in Enhanced Oil Recovery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1