同意、共识还是对异议的管理?:在新的警务环境下,社区谘询面临的挑战

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Policing & Society Pub Date : 1997-08-01 DOI:10.1080/10439463.1997.9964778
C. Harfield
{"title":"同意、共识还是对异议的管理?:在新的警务环境下,社区谘询面临的挑战","authors":"C. Harfield","doi":"10.1080/10439463.1997.9964778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expecting community consultation structures of doubtful effectiveness devised for one purpose in 1984 to be able simultaneously to meet very different demands in 1994 is unrealistic. The role for community consultation groups is considered within the context of the Enforcement, Service and Community Models of policing and within the philosophy of New Public Management. Community consultation is examined alongside other democratic values pertinent to policing. More honest expectations of what consultation can realistically achieve are advocated because community consultation structures cannot reliably be used as a basis for setting policing objectives, and indeed are largely impotent in the objective‐setting process.","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":"240 1","pages":"271-289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consent, consensus or the management of dissent?: Challenges to community consultation in a new policing environment\",\"authors\":\"C. Harfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10439463.1997.9964778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Expecting community consultation structures of doubtful effectiveness devised for one purpose in 1984 to be able simultaneously to meet very different demands in 1994 is unrealistic. The role for community consultation groups is considered within the context of the Enforcement, Service and Community Models of policing and within the philosophy of New Public Management. Community consultation is examined alongside other democratic values pertinent to policing. More honest expectations of what consultation can realistically achieve are advocated because community consultation structures cannot reliably be used as a basis for setting policing objectives, and indeed are largely impotent in the objective‐setting process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing & Society\",\"volume\":\"240 1\",\"pages\":\"271-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1997.9964778\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1997.9964778","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

期望1984年为一个目的而设计的效力存疑的社区协商结构在1994年能够同时满足非常不同的需求是不现实的。社区咨询小组的作用是在执法、服务和社区警务模式以及新公共管理理念的背景下考虑的。社区咨询与其他与警务有关的民主价值观一起进行审查。由于社区咨询结构不能可靠地用作制定警务目标的基础,而且在制定目标的过程中,实际上在很大程度上是无能为力的,因此我们提倡对咨询实际能够实现的目标进行更诚实的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consent, consensus or the management of dissent?: Challenges to community consultation in a new policing environment
Expecting community consultation structures of doubtful effectiveness devised for one purpose in 1984 to be able simultaneously to meet very different demands in 1994 is unrealistic. The role for community consultation groups is considered within the context of the Enforcement, Service and Community Models of policing and within the philosophy of New Public Management. Community consultation is examined alongside other democratic values pertinent to policing. More honest expectations of what consultation can realistically achieve are advocated because community consultation structures cannot reliably be used as a basis for setting policing objectives, and indeed are largely impotent in the objective‐setting process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
期刊最新文献
Police and protest in the digital age – a post-Soviet comparison of citizen-police relations ‘Strands in a cable’: effective investigator decision-making using forensic identification evidence in volume crime investigations Can dialogue help police officers and young Black adults understand each other? Key findings from a restorative process Public support for empowering police during the COVID-19 crisis: evidence from London Youth’s contacts with private security guards: compulsive and assistive encounters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1