期刊的作者指南是否告诉我们我们需要了解的抄袭?

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Scholarly Publishing Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.3138/JSP.52.3.03
Yu-Chih Sun
{"title":"期刊的作者指南是否告诉我们我们需要了解的抄袭?","authors":"Yu-Chih Sun","doi":"10.3138/JSP.52.3.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Author guidelines for submitting manuscripts to journals play an essential role in communicating academic ethics and standards to prospective authors and in ensuring the originality of the articles that journals publish. The purpose of this study was to conduct a cross-journal analysis of author guidelines to see how they address plagiarism. One hundred author guidelines were selected randomly and were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The findings revealed that the guidelines varied in the extent to which they covered plagiarism. Among the elements of plagiarism addressed, the four most common were duplicate publication, copyright, the definition of plagiarism of others' work, and proper citation. The allowance for reproduction of language ranged along a spectrum from very strict (no verbatim copying of another's words) to less strict (no verbatim copying of significant portions of others' work). Although self-plagiarism is the most common form of plagiarism, it was addressed relatively less often than plagiarism of others' work.","PeriodicalId":44613,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Journals' Author Guidelines Tell Us What We Need to Know about Plagiarism?\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Chih Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/JSP.52.3.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Author guidelines for submitting manuscripts to journals play an essential role in communicating academic ethics and standards to prospective authors and in ensuring the originality of the articles that journals publish. The purpose of this study was to conduct a cross-journal analysis of author guidelines to see how they address plagiarism. One hundred author guidelines were selected randomly and were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The findings revealed that the guidelines varied in the extent to which they covered plagiarism. Among the elements of plagiarism addressed, the four most common were duplicate publication, copyright, the definition of plagiarism of others' work, and proper citation. The allowance for reproduction of language ranged along a spectrum from very strict (no verbatim copying of another's words) to less strict (no verbatim copying of significant portions of others' work). Although self-plagiarism is the most common form of plagiarism, it was addressed relatively less often than plagiarism of others' work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scholarly Publishing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scholarly Publishing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/JSP.52.3.03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/JSP.52.3.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:作者投稿指南在向潜在作者传达学术道德和学术标准以及确保期刊发表文章的原创性方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究的目的是对作者指南进行跨期刊分析,看看他们是如何处理抄袭的。随机抽取100份作者指南进行定性和定量分析。调查结果显示,这些指导方针对抄袭的涵盖程度各不相同。在涉及抄袭的要素中,最常见的四个是重复出版、版权、剽窃他人作品的定义和适当引用。对语言复制的允许范围从非常严格(不逐字抄袭他人的文字)到不那么严格(不逐字抄袭他人作品的重要部分)不等。虽然自我抄袭是最常见的抄袭形式,但与抄袭他人的作品相比,它被处理得相对较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Journals' Author Guidelines Tell Us What We Need to Know about Plagiarism?
Abstract:Author guidelines for submitting manuscripts to journals play an essential role in communicating academic ethics and standards to prospective authors and in ensuring the originality of the articles that journals publish. The purpose of this study was to conduct a cross-journal analysis of author guidelines to see how they address plagiarism. One hundred author guidelines were selected randomly and were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The findings revealed that the guidelines varied in the extent to which they covered plagiarism. Among the elements of plagiarism addressed, the four most common were duplicate publication, copyright, the definition of plagiarism of others' work, and proper citation. The allowance for reproduction of language ranged along a spectrum from very strict (no verbatim copying of another's words) to less strict (no verbatim copying of significant portions of others' work). Although self-plagiarism is the most common form of plagiarism, it was addressed relatively less often than plagiarism of others' work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: For more than 40 years, the Journal of Scholarly Publishing has been the authoritative voice of academic publishing. The journal combines philosophical analysis with practical advice and aspires to explain, argue, discuss, and question the large collection of new topics that continually arise in the publishing field. JSP has also examined the future of scholarly publishing, scholarship on the web, digitization, copyright, editorial policies, computer applications, marketing, and pricing models. It is the indispensable resource for academics and publishers that addresses the new challenges resulting from changes in technology and funding and from innovations in production and publishing.
期刊最新文献
Crossing Between Clinical Work and Scholarly Publishing: Early-Career Neurosurgeons as Clinician-Researchers The Ethics of Scholarly Book Reviewing On Editor’s Instructions to Manuscript Reviewers Unraveling the Attributes of Productive Scholars in Social Science Fields: A Study of Chinese Scholars Publishing in Top-Tier International Journals The Conceptual ‘APC Ring’: Is There a Risk of APC-Driven Guest Authorship, and Is a Change in the Culture of the APC Needed?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1