并网逆变器三种小信号稳定性分析方法的比较

Liangwei Huang, Chao Wu, Dao Zhou, F. Blaabjerg
{"title":"并网逆变器三种小信号稳定性分析方法的比较","authors":"Liangwei Huang, Chao Wu, Dao Zhou, F. Blaabjerg","doi":"10.1109/OPTIM-ACEMP50812.2021.9590036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional vector current control (VCC) based grid-following inverters suffer from stability issues under weak grid, which attracts a lot of attention in recent years. Small-signal linearized model is an effective tool to analyze the stability of such nonlinear systems. In this paper, three small-signal stability analysis methods are compared, which are the state-space method, impedance analysis method, and equivalent single-input single-output (SISO) stability analysis method. These three methods are based on the same primitive system but with different input-output relations. Through strict analysis, it is found that the three methods basically predict the same stability boundary. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of three methods are summarized and compared.","PeriodicalId":32117,"journal":{"name":"Bioma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Three Small-Signal Stability Analysis Methods for Grid-Following Inverter\",\"authors\":\"Liangwei Huang, Chao Wu, Dao Zhou, F. Blaabjerg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OPTIM-ACEMP50812.2021.9590036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventional vector current control (VCC) based grid-following inverters suffer from stability issues under weak grid, which attracts a lot of attention in recent years. Small-signal linearized model is an effective tool to analyze the stability of such nonlinear systems. In this paper, three small-signal stability analysis methods are compared, which are the state-space method, impedance analysis method, and equivalent single-input single-output (SISO) stability analysis method. These three methods are based on the same primitive system but with different input-output relations. Through strict analysis, it is found that the three methods basically predict the same stability boundary. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of three methods are summarized and compared.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIM-ACEMP50812.2021.9590036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIM-ACEMP50812.2021.9590036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

传统的基于矢量电流控制(VCC)的随网逆变器在弱电网条件下存在稳定性问题,近年来备受关注。小信号线性化模型是分析此类非线性系统稳定性的有效工具。本文比较了三种小信号稳定性分析方法,即状态空间法、阻抗分析法和等效单输入单输出(SISO)稳定性分析法。这三种方法都是基于相同的原语系统,但具有不同的输入输出关系。通过严格的分析,发现三种方法预测的稳定边界基本一致。最后,对三种方法的优缺点进行了总结和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Three Small-Signal Stability Analysis Methods for Grid-Following Inverter
Conventional vector current control (VCC) based grid-following inverters suffer from stability issues under weak grid, which attracts a lot of attention in recent years. Small-signal linearized model is an effective tool to analyze the stability of such nonlinear systems. In this paper, three small-signal stability analysis methods are compared, which are the state-space method, impedance analysis method, and equivalent single-input single-output (SISO) stability analysis method. These three methods are based on the same primitive system but with different input-output relations. Through strict analysis, it is found that the three methods basically predict the same stability boundary. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of three methods are summarized and compared.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Differences of Male and Female Students’s Problem Solving Ability in Environmental Change Topic Based on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) The Effect of Discovery Learning on The Development and Strengthening of Understanding Basic Concepts in Biology Based on Students’ Experiences Implementation of Standard Operating Procedures In Biology Practicum High School Liver Histopathology of Mice Induced by Paracetamol on Administration of Methanol Extract of Laban Tree Bark (Vitex pubescens Vahl.) Tree Species Diversity at Kebon Rojo, Blitar City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1