Q3 Arts and Humanities Colloquia Pub Date : 2020-12-21 DOI:10.51554/col.2020.28586
A. Sverdiolas
{"title":"Witold Gombrowicz and Philosophy","authors":"A. Sverdiolas","doi":"10.51554/col.2020.28586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author of the article examines Witold Gombrowicz’s literary texts, diaries, lectures, essays, interviews and letters, as well as memoirs about him, trying to reconstruct the most important philosophical issues that concerned the writer and to describe the nature of his philosophizing. Gombrowicz’s philosophyzing is placed in the very broad context of the Western philosophical thinking tradition. Subsequently, that context is narrowed down to Jean-Paul Sartre’s existentialism which was closest to Gombrowicz and from which he specified his own position by strictly limiting Sartre’s concept of activistic freedom and self-creation and introducing the issue of pain and suffering.Gombrowicz fundamentally modified Edmund Husserl’s phenomenological conception of the transcendental ego, paradoxically identifying it with his own self. The author of the article also draws attention to the philosophy of life, mentioned neither by Gombrowicz nor the authors who researched his philosophy, which is important for understanding the foundations of writer’s thinking. He also analyzes the relationship between philosophical and literary thinking, the personality or even privacy of philosophizing, the “implementation” of philosophical thinking, and other issues.","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":"357 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51554/col.2020.28586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文作者考察了维托尔德·贡布洛维奇的文学文本、日记、演讲、散文、访谈和信件,以及关于他的回忆录,试图重构与这位作家有关的最重要的哲学问题,并描述他哲学思考的本质。冈布罗维奇的哲学思想被置于西方哲学思维传统的广阔背景中。随后,这一背景被缩小到让-保罗·萨特的存在主义,这是最接近贡布洛维奇的,他通过严格限制萨特的行动自由和自我创造的概念,并引入痛苦和苦难的问题,来明确自己的立场。冈布罗维奇从根本上修改了胡塞尔关于先验自我的现象学概念,矛盾地将其与他自己的自我等同起来。文章的作者还提到了贡布洛维奇和研究他的哲学的作者都没有提到的生活哲学,这对于理解作家的思想基础很重要。他还分析了哲学思维与文学思维的关系、哲学思维的个性甚至私密性、哲学思维的“实施”等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Witold Gombrowicz and Philosophy
The author of the article examines Witold Gombrowicz’s literary texts, diaries, lectures, essays, interviews and letters, as well as memoirs about him, trying to reconstruct the most important philosophical issues that concerned the writer and to describe the nature of his philosophizing. Gombrowicz’s philosophyzing is placed in the very broad context of the Western philosophical thinking tradition. Subsequently, that context is narrowed down to Jean-Paul Sartre’s existentialism which was closest to Gombrowicz and from which he specified his own position by strictly limiting Sartre’s concept of activistic freedom and self-creation and introducing the issue of pain and suffering.Gombrowicz fundamentally modified Edmund Husserl’s phenomenological conception of the transcendental ego, paradoxically identifying it with his own self. The author of the article also draws attention to the philosophy of life, mentioned neither by Gombrowicz nor the authors who researched his philosophy, which is important for understanding the foundations of writer’s thinking. He also analyzes the relationship between philosophical and literary thinking, the personality or even privacy of philosophizing, the “implementation” of philosophical thinking, and other issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colloquia
Colloquia Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kilmingosios raganos atspindys skirtinguose veidrodžiuose: Veronikos iš Desenicės motyvo transformacija slovėnų kultūros kanone Icchokas Meras’ ‘Lygiosios trunka akimirką’ (Stalemate) in the UnequalBattle Against the Censors ,,Tas laisvės troškimas“ (arba Kodėl verta tyrinėti jaunimo subkultūrines grupes) Žurnalo „Дружба народов“ redakcija. Drg. Mero rankraščio aptarimo stenograma. 1963 m. liepos 8 d. The Biography of a Writer as an Argument in (De)Canonisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1