智能手表vs.智能手机:驾驶时的通知粘性

IF 0.2 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction Pub Date : 2017-04-01 DOI:10.4018/IJMHCI.2017040103
W. Giang, H. Chen, Birsen Donmez
{"title":"智能手表vs.智能手机:驾驶时的通知粘性","authors":"W. Giang, H. Chen, Birsen Donmez","doi":"10.4018/IJMHCI.2017040103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work seeks to understand whether the unique features of a smartwatch, compared to a smartphone, mitigate or exacerbate driver distraction due to notifications, and to provide insights about drivers' perceptions of the risks associated with using smartwatches while driving. As smartwatches are gaining popularity among consumers, there is a need to understand how smartwatch use may influence driving performance. Previous driving research has examined voice calling on smartwatches, but not interactions with notifications, a key marketed feature. Engaging with notifications e.g., reading and texting on a handheld device is a known distraction associated with increased crash risks. Two driving simulator studies compared smartwatch to smartphone notifications. Experiment I asked participants to read aloud brief text notifications and Experiment II had participants manually select a response to arithmetic questions presented as notifications. Both experiments investigated the resulting glances to and physical interactions with the devices, as well as self-reported risk perception. Experiment II also investigated driving performance and self-reported knowledge/expectation about legislation surrounding the use of smart devices while driving. Experiment I found that participants were faster to visually engage with the notification on the smartwatch than the smartphone, took longer to finish reading aloud the notifications, and exhibited more glances longer than 1.6 s. Experiment II found that participants took longer to reply to notifications and had longer overall glance durations on the smartwatch than the smartphone, along with longer brake reaction times to lead vehicle braking events. Compared to the no device baseline, both devices increased lane position variability and resulted in higher self-reported perceived risk. Experiment II participants also considered that smartwatch use while driving deserves penalties equal to or less than smartphone use. The findings suggest that smartwatches may have road safety consequences. Given the common view among participants to associate smartwatch use with equal or less traffic penalties than smartphone use, there may be a disconnect between drivers' actual performance and their perceptions about smartwatch use while driving.","PeriodicalId":43100,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smartwatches vs. Smartphones: Notification Engagement while Driving\",\"authors\":\"W. Giang, H. Chen, Birsen Donmez\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJMHCI.2017040103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work seeks to understand whether the unique features of a smartwatch, compared to a smartphone, mitigate or exacerbate driver distraction due to notifications, and to provide insights about drivers' perceptions of the risks associated with using smartwatches while driving. As smartwatches are gaining popularity among consumers, there is a need to understand how smartwatch use may influence driving performance. Previous driving research has examined voice calling on smartwatches, but not interactions with notifications, a key marketed feature. Engaging with notifications e.g., reading and texting on a handheld device is a known distraction associated with increased crash risks. Two driving simulator studies compared smartwatch to smartphone notifications. Experiment I asked participants to read aloud brief text notifications and Experiment II had participants manually select a response to arithmetic questions presented as notifications. Both experiments investigated the resulting glances to and physical interactions with the devices, as well as self-reported risk perception. Experiment II also investigated driving performance and self-reported knowledge/expectation about legislation surrounding the use of smart devices while driving. Experiment I found that participants were faster to visually engage with the notification on the smartwatch than the smartphone, took longer to finish reading aloud the notifications, and exhibited more glances longer than 1.6 s. Experiment II found that participants took longer to reply to notifications and had longer overall glance durations on the smartwatch than the smartphone, along with longer brake reaction times to lead vehicle braking events. Compared to the no device baseline, both devices increased lane position variability and resulted in higher self-reported perceived risk. Experiment II participants also considered that smartwatch use while driving deserves penalties equal to or less than smartphone use. The findings suggest that smartwatches may have road safety consequences. Given the common view among participants to associate smartwatch use with equal or less traffic penalties than smartphone use, there may be a disconnect between drivers' actual performance and their perceptions about smartwatch use while driving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMHCI.2017040103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMHCI.2017040103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这项工作旨在了解与智能手机相比,智能手表的独特功能是否减轻或加剧了驾驶员因通知而引起的分心,并提供驾驶员对驾驶时使用智能手表相关风险的看法。随着智能手表在消费者中越来越受欢迎,有必要了解智能手表的使用如何影响驾驶性能。之前的驾驶研究研究了智能手表上的语音呼叫,但没有研究与通知的交互,这是一项关键的市场功能。使用通知,例如在手持设备上阅读和发短信,是一种众所周知的分心,与增加撞车风险有关。两项驾驶模拟器研究将智能手表和智能手机通知进行了比较。实验一要求参与者大声朗读简短的文本通知,实验二让参与者手动选择一个作为通知的算术问题的答案。这两个实验都调查了人们对这些设备的目光和身体互动,以及自我报告的风险感知。实验二还调查了驾驶表现和自述的关于驾驶时使用智能设备的立法知识/期望。实验一发现,与智能手机相比,参与者在视觉上更快地关注智能手表上的通知,花更长的时间来大声朗读通知,并且花了更多的时间来浏览超过1.6秒的通知。实验二发现,参与者回复通知的时间更长,看智能手表的时间也比看智能手机的时间更长,对车辆刹车事件的反应时间也更长。与无装置基线相比,两种装置都增加了车道位置的可变性,并导致更高的自我报告感知风险。实验二的参与者还认为,开车时使用智能手表应该受到与使用智能手机相同或更少的处罚。研究结果表明,智能手表可能会对道路安全造成影响。考虑到参与者普遍认为,与使用智能手机相比,使用智能手表带来的交通处罚相同或更少,司机的实际表现与他们对驾驶时使用智能手表的看法可能存在脱节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smartwatches vs. Smartphones: Notification Engagement while Driving
This work seeks to understand whether the unique features of a smartwatch, compared to a smartphone, mitigate or exacerbate driver distraction due to notifications, and to provide insights about drivers' perceptions of the risks associated with using smartwatches while driving. As smartwatches are gaining popularity among consumers, there is a need to understand how smartwatch use may influence driving performance. Previous driving research has examined voice calling on smartwatches, but not interactions with notifications, a key marketed feature. Engaging with notifications e.g., reading and texting on a handheld device is a known distraction associated with increased crash risks. Two driving simulator studies compared smartwatch to smartphone notifications. Experiment I asked participants to read aloud brief text notifications and Experiment II had participants manually select a response to arithmetic questions presented as notifications. Both experiments investigated the resulting glances to and physical interactions with the devices, as well as self-reported risk perception. Experiment II also investigated driving performance and self-reported knowledge/expectation about legislation surrounding the use of smart devices while driving. Experiment I found that participants were faster to visually engage with the notification on the smartwatch than the smartphone, took longer to finish reading aloud the notifications, and exhibited more glances longer than 1.6 s. Experiment II found that participants took longer to reply to notifications and had longer overall glance durations on the smartwatch than the smartphone, along with longer brake reaction times to lead vehicle braking events. Compared to the no device baseline, both devices increased lane position variability and resulted in higher self-reported perceived risk. Experiment II participants also considered that smartwatch use while driving deserves penalties equal to or less than smartphone use. The findings suggest that smartwatches may have road safety consequences. Given the common view among participants to associate smartwatch use with equal or less traffic penalties than smartphone use, there may be a disconnect between drivers' actual performance and their perceptions about smartwatch use while driving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Embodying a Virtual Agent in a Self-Driving Car Predictors of Usability of a Mobile Intelligent Agent Information Provider for College Students A Correlation Study of Demographic Characteristics and Smartphone Task Performance: A Comparison Between Younger and Elderly Users The Indirect Effect of Theory of Mind on the Relationship of Smartphone Addiction and Autism Quotient Comparing Scales for the Assessment of Visual Aesthetics of Mobile GUIs Through Human Judgments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1