欧亚经济联盟与“一带一路”在中亚:从内陆区向陆联区转型?

Q3 Social Sciences Central Asia and the Caucasus Pub Date : 2021-08-27 DOI:10.54418/ca-88.146
Adam Saud, Sarwat Rauf
{"title":"欧亚经济联盟与“一带一路”在中亚:从内陆区向陆联区转型?","authors":"Adam Saud, Sarwat Rauf","doi":"10.54418/ca-88.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central Asia is one of the least integrated regions of Asia. Being a landlocked region, it depends on its neighboring states, especially Russia and China for its international trade through land. Both these states also have geo-political and geo-economic interests in this region. Both have been pro-active to integrate Central Asia into ‘their’ initiatives of integration.  Russian led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) are two good examples in this regard. It has been observed that both EAEU and BRI may complement each other in the fields of infrastructure and transportation network development, energy security, and environmental issues. However, there are certain challenges to both the initiatives which include the divergent natures of both initiatives. First, BRI is a bilateral project while EAEU is a multilateral institution with well-defined hierarchy, rules and regulations. Second, all the Central Asian Republics (CARs) are members of BRI, whereas only two CARs viz. Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan are members of EAEU. Third, both Russia and China compete with each other for the hydrocarbons of the region. However, both initiatives have failed to contribute substantially in the industrial development of Central Asia. This research focuses on how both EAEU and BRI projects would help out Central Asia to become a Land-Linked region. The article addresses the questions; what are the objectives of EAEU and BRI? Why have CARs joined these organizations? And How can CARs benefits from both the organizations while balancing Russia and China in their foreign policies? Qualitative research methodology with secondary sources has been applied to this research while World Orders and Neo-Functionalism explain the problem.","PeriodicalId":53489,"journal":{"name":"Central Asia and the Caucasus","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EAEU and BRI in Central Asia: Transformation from Land-Locked to Land-Linked Region?\",\"authors\":\"Adam Saud, Sarwat Rauf\",\"doi\":\"10.54418/ca-88.146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Central Asia is one of the least integrated regions of Asia. Being a landlocked region, it depends on its neighboring states, especially Russia and China for its international trade through land. Both these states also have geo-political and geo-economic interests in this region. Both have been pro-active to integrate Central Asia into ‘their’ initiatives of integration.  Russian led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) are two good examples in this regard. It has been observed that both EAEU and BRI may complement each other in the fields of infrastructure and transportation network development, energy security, and environmental issues. However, there are certain challenges to both the initiatives which include the divergent natures of both initiatives. First, BRI is a bilateral project while EAEU is a multilateral institution with well-defined hierarchy, rules and regulations. Second, all the Central Asian Republics (CARs) are members of BRI, whereas only two CARs viz. Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan are members of EAEU. Third, both Russia and China compete with each other for the hydrocarbons of the region. However, both initiatives have failed to contribute substantially in the industrial development of Central Asia. This research focuses on how both EAEU and BRI projects would help out Central Asia to become a Land-Linked region. The article addresses the questions; what are the objectives of EAEU and BRI? Why have CARs joined these organizations? And How can CARs benefits from both the organizations while balancing Russia and China in their foreign policies? Qualitative research methodology with secondary sources has been applied to this research while World Orders and Neo-Functionalism explain the problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central Asia and the Caucasus\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central Asia and the Caucasus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-88.146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asia and the Caucasus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-88.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中亚是亚洲一体化程度最低的地区之一。作为一个内陆地区,它依靠其邻国,特别是俄罗斯和中国通过陆路进行国际贸易。这两个国家在该地区也有地缘政治和地缘经济利益。两国都积极地将中亚纳入“自己的”一体化倡议。俄罗斯主导的欧亚经济联盟(EAEU)和中国的“一带一路”倡议就是两个很好的例子。人们注意到,欧亚经济联盟和“一带一路”倡议在基础设施和交通网络建设、能源安全、环境等领域可以实现优势互补。然而,这两个倡议都面临着一些挑战,其中包括两个倡议的不同性质。第一,“一带一路”是双边项目,欧亚经济联盟是多边机构,层级清晰、规则完善。第二,所有中亚国家都是“一带一路”的成员,而只有哈萨克斯坦和吉尔吉斯斯坦两个国家是欧亚经济联盟的成员。第三,俄罗斯和中国都在争夺该地区的碳氢化合物。然而,这两项倡议都未能对中亚的工业发展作出重大贡献。本研究的重点是欧亚经济联盟和“一带一路”项目如何帮助中亚成为陆联地区。文章解决了这些问题;欧亚经济联盟和“一带一路”的目标是什么?car为什么要加入这些组织?在平衡俄罗斯和中国的外交政策的同时,中非如何从这两个组织中受益?二手资料的定性研究方法被应用于这项研究,而世界秩序和新功能主义解释了这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EAEU and BRI in Central Asia: Transformation from Land-Locked to Land-Linked Region?
Central Asia is one of the least integrated regions of Asia. Being a landlocked region, it depends on its neighboring states, especially Russia and China for its international trade through land. Both these states also have geo-political and geo-economic interests in this region. Both have been pro-active to integrate Central Asia into ‘their’ initiatives of integration.  Russian led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) are two good examples in this regard. It has been observed that both EAEU and BRI may complement each other in the fields of infrastructure and transportation network development, energy security, and environmental issues. However, there are certain challenges to both the initiatives which include the divergent natures of both initiatives. First, BRI is a bilateral project while EAEU is a multilateral institution with well-defined hierarchy, rules and regulations. Second, all the Central Asian Republics (CARs) are members of BRI, whereas only two CARs viz. Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan are members of EAEU. Third, both Russia and China compete with each other for the hydrocarbons of the region. However, both initiatives have failed to contribute substantially in the industrial development of Central Asia. This research focuses on how both EAEU and BRI projects would help out Central Asia to become a Land-Linked region. The article addresses the questions; what are the objectives of EAEU and BRI? Why have CARs joined these organizations? And How can CARs benefits from both the organizations while balancing Russia and China in their foreign policies? Qualitative research methodology with secondary sources has been applied to this research while World Orders and Neo-Functionalism explain the problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central Asia and the Caucasus
Central Asia and the Caucasus Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Pakistan's Trade Opportunities and Challenges with CARs: Metaphor Used by the US as a Lethal Weapon of Mass Destruction against the Other for Pursuing Ulterior Motives Prohibition on Opium Poppy Cultivation in Afghanistan: Geo-Politics of Afghanistan under Taliban Regime: Pakistan and Central Asian Republics: Cooperation and Opportunities -Trade and Energy corridors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1