多种完井设计的生产性能:裸眼、开槽尾管、ICD和AICD:厄瓜多尔Villano油田控水案例研究

A. Andrade, M. Chango, G. Atahualpa, R. Correa, G. Corona, Byron Calvopina, J. Pico
{"title":"多种完井设计的生产性能:裸眼、开槽尾管、ICD和AICD:厄瓜多尔Villano油田控水案例研究","authors":"A. Andrade, M. Chango, G. Atahualpa, R. Correa, G. Corona, Byron Calvopina, J. Pico","doi":"10.2118/191635-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents an analysis of the effectiveness of various downhole completion designs in reducing or deferring water production in a mature field under the presence of an active strong aquifer reservoir. The results of completions using nozzle inflow control devices (ICDs) and fluidic diode autonomous ICDs (AICDs) are compared with conventional openhole and slotted liner completions. As all of these designs were installed in the same field/reservoir, the comparisons provide a meaningful and representative analysis of well production performance to assist in the identification of the most appropriate completion design for future wells and the production optimization of existing ones. The designed vs. actual production performance of inflow control completions providing water control (ICD/AICD) is presented and discussed.\n The methodology was developed from comparative analysis results of conventional openhole and slotted liner vs. ICD and AICD completions. The analysis was primarily based on elapsed time comparisons for water/oil ratio (WOR) and water cut (WC) and used diagnostic plots to identify the water production mechanisms, historical drawdown (DD), productivity index (PI), and production cumulative performance (oil and water). The corrective actions are described, including operational procedures to reduce skin damage and screen plugging implemented in the Villano-23HST2 (V-23HST2) well, which is the longest horizontal well drilled in Ecuador and completed using AICDs; these corrective actions were based on lessons learned from the Villano-22D (V-22D) well, which included appropriate fluid [brine/oil-based mud (OBM)] conditioning, fluid displacement, filter cake removal, and compatibility testing between screens and the fluid in which the bottomhole assembly (BHA) was deployed. Additionally, this paper evaluates the importance of the design phase, emphasizing the importance of comparing preliminary data (permeability and water saturation) compared to actual results obtained from the initial production test. Finally, as good production results largely depend on successful operational procedures and execution, lessons learned and best practices for deploying downhole completions in future operations for the Villano field in Ecuador are discussed.\n Although many studies compare ICDs vs. conventional completions, few compare different inflow control technologies, such as ICDs vs. AICDs, within the same reservoir and with similar well conditions. This paper compares various inflow control technologies in the same field with cumulative production data, which verifies the effectiveness of each completion design. Based on these results, a validated methodology for ICD and AICD simulations and design is also described as the basis for achieving good production results.","PeriodicalId":11015,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, September 24, 2018","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Production Performance of Multiple Completion Designs: Openhole, Slotted Liner, ICD, and AICD: A Case Study for Water Control in Villano Field, Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"A. Andrade, M. Chango, G. Atahualpa, R. Correa, G. Corona, Byron Calvopina, J. Pico\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191635-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents an analysis of the effectiveness of various downhole completion designs in reducing or deferring water production in a mature field under the presence of an active strong aquifer reservoir. The results of completions using nozzle inflow control devices (ICDs) and fluidic diode autonomous ICDs (AICDs) are compared with conventional openhole and slotted liner completions. As all of these designs were installed in the same field/reservoir, the comparisons provide a meaningful and representative analysis of well production performance to assist in the identification of the most appropriate completion design for future wells and the production optimization of existing ones. The designed vs. actual production performance of inflow control completions providing water control (ICD/AICD) is presented and discussed.\\n The methodology was developed from comparative analysis results of conventional openhole and slotted liner vs. ICD and AICD completions. The analysis was primarily based on elapsed time comparisons for water/oil ratio (WOR) and water cut (WC) and used diagnostic plots to identify the water production mechanisms, historical drawdown (DD), productivity index (PI), and production cumulative performance (oil and water). The corrective actions are described, including operational procedures to reduce skin damage and screen plugging implemented in the Villano-23HST2 (V-23HST2) well, which is the longest horizontal well drilled in Ecuador and completed using AICDs; these corrective actions were based on lessons learned from the Villano-22D (V-22D) well, which included appropriate fluid [brine/oil-based mud (OBM)] conditioning, fluid displacement, filter cake removal, and compatibility testing between screens and the fluid in which the bottomhole assembly (BHA) was deployed. Additionally, this paper evaluates the importance of the design phase, emphasizing the importance of comparing preliminary data (permeability and water saturation) compared to actual results obtained from the initial production test. Finally, as good production results largely depend on successful operational procedures and execution, lessons learned and best practices for deploying downhole completions in future operations for the Villano field in Ecuador are discussed.\\n Although many studies compare ICDs vs. conventional completions, few compare different inflow control technologies, such as ICDs vs. AICDs, within the same reservoir and with similar well conditions. This paper compares various inflow control technologies in the same field with cumulative production data, which verifies the effectiveness of each completion design. Based on these results, a validated methodology for ICD and AICD simulations and design is also described as the basis for achieving good production results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, September 24, 2018\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, September 24, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191635-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, September 24, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191635-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文分析了在存在活跃的强含水层油藏的成熟油田中,各种井下完井设计在减少或推迟产水方面的有效性。采用喷嘴流入控制装置(icd)和流体二极管自主icd (aicd)的完井效果与常规裸眼井和开槽尾管完井进行了比较。由于所有这些设计都安装在同一油田/油藏中,因此这些比较提供了对油井生产动态的有意义和代表性的分析,以帮助确定未来井的最合适的完井设计和现有井的生产优化。介绍并讨论了提供水控制(ICD/AICD)的流入控制完井的设计与实际生产性能。该方法是根据常规裸眼和开槽尾管与ICD和AICD完井的对比分析结果开发的。分析主要基于水/油比(WOR)和含水率(WC)的运行时间比较,并使用诊断图来确定产水机制、历史递减量(DD)、生产力指数(PI)和生产累积性能(油水)。介绍了纠正措施,包括在Villano-23HST2 (V-23HST2)井中实施的减少皮肤损伤和筛管堵塞的操作程序,该井是厄瓜多尔最长的水平井,使用aicd完成;这些纠正措施是基于Villano-22D (V-22D)井的经验教训,包括适当的流体[盐水/油基泥浆(OBM)]调节、流体置换、滤饼清除以及筛管与底部钻具组合(BHA)所使用的流体之间的相容性测试。此外,本文还评估了设计阶段的重要性,强调了将初步数据(渗透率和含水饱和度)与初始生产测试的实际结果进行比较的重要性。最后,由于良好的生产效果在很大程度上取决于成功的操作程序和执行,因此本文讨论了在厄瓜多尔Villano油田未来作业中部署井下完井的经验教训和最佳实践。尽管许多研究比较了icd与常规完井,但很少有研究比较相同油藏和类似井况下不同的流入控制技术,例如icd与aicd。通过对同一油田的各种井涌控制技术进行对比,并结合累积生产数据,验证了各种完井设计的有效性。基于这些结果,ICD和AICD模拟和设计的验证方法也被描述为获得良好生产效果的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Production Performance of Multiple Completion Designs: Openhole, Slotted Liner, ICD, and AICD: A Case Study for Water Control in Villano Field, Ecuador
This paper presents an analysis of the effectiveness of various downhole completion designs in reducing or deferring water production in a mature field under the presence of an active strong aquifer reservoir. The results of completions using nozzle inflow control devices (ICDs) and fluidic diode autonomous ICDs (AICDs) are compared with conventional openhole and slotted liner completions. As all of these designs were installed in the same field/reservoir, the comparisons provide a meaningful and representative analysis of well production performance to assist in the identification of the most appropriate completion design for future wells and the production optimization of existing ones. The designed vs. actual production performance of inflow control completions providing water control (ICD/AICD) is presented and discussed. The methodology was developed from comparative analysis results of conventional openhole and slotted liner vs. ICD and AICD completions. The analysis was primarily based on elapsed time comparisons for water/oil ratio (WOR) and water cut (WC) and used diagnostic plots to identify the water production mechanisms, historical drawdown (DD), productivity index (PI), and production cumulative performance (oil and water). The corrective actions are described, including operational procedures to reduce skin damage and screen plugging implemented in the Villano-23HST2 (V-23HST2) well, which is the longest horizontal well drilled in Ecuador and completed using AICDs; these corrective actions were based on lessons learned from the Villano-22D (V-22D) well, which included appropriate fluid [brine/oil-based mud (OBM)] conditioning, fluid displacement, filter cake removal, and compatibility testing between screens and the fluid in which the bottomhole assembly (BHA) was deployed. Additionally, this paper evaluates the importance of the design phase, emphasizing the importance of comparing preliminary data (permeability and water saturation) compared to actual results obtained from the initial production test. Finally, as good production results largely depend on successful operational procedures and execution, lessons learned and best practices for deploying downhole completions in future operations for the Villano field in Ecuador are discussed. Although many studies compare ICDs vs. conventional completions, few compare different inflow control technologies, such as ICDs vs. AICDs, within the same reservoir and with similar well conditions. This paper compares various inflow control technologies in the same field with cumulative production data, which verifies the effectiveness of each completion design. Based on these results, a validated methodology for ICD and AICD simulations and design is also described as the basis for achieving good production results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulatory and sustainability initiatives lead to improved polyaminopolyamide epichlorohydrin (PAE) wet-strength resins and paper products Rewet in wet pressing of paper Mineral/microfibrillated cellulose composite materials: High performance products, applications, and product forms Challenges and Lessons Learned During Completion of Intelligent Multilateral Wells in Minagish Field, West Kuwait Asphaltene Studies in On-Shore Abu Dhabi Fields, Part IV: Development of a Surface Sensor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1