{"title":"巩固堡垒:把握基础阶段的阅读教学法","authors":"Kellie Steinke, R. Wildsmith-Cromarty","doi":"10.5785/35-3-806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this paper is on an instrument known as the Facilitative Orientation to Reading Teaching, or FORT, that was designed to capture how teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) can influence literacy acquisition at Foundation Phase level. T he FORT can capture the ‘what’ and ‘how often’ of classroom practice and, when combined with qualitative data, it can provide the ‘why’ and also ascertain whether what teachers say they do when they teach is in accordance with their actual classroom practice. The effectiveness of the instrument will be explained via specific findings from a multiple-case study undertaken with Grade 3 and 4 learners between 2015 and 2017 at two schools in the Midlands area of KwaZulu-Natal. The study involved a total of eight teachers and their classes, while the researchers recorded a total of 34 lessons, most of which were taught in English and some in isiZulu, with class sizes ranging between 35 and 45 learners. Findings indicate that additional training alone may be insufficient to change embedded top-down and teacher-led teaching styles and that teachers may benefit more from on-going support and mentoring such as coaching.","PeriodicalId":43109,"journal":{"name":"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning","volume":"26 1","pages":"29-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Securing the fort: Capturing reading pedagogy in the Foundation Phase\",\"authors\":\"Kellie Steinke, R. Wildsmith-Cromarty\",\"doi\":\"10.5785/35-3-806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The focus of this paper is on an instrument known as the Facilitative Orientation to Reading Teaching, or FORT, that was designed to capture how teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) can influence literacy acquisition at Foundation Phase level. T he FORT can capture the ‘what’ and ‘how often’ of classroom practice and, when combined with qualitative data, it can provide the ‘why’ and also ascertain whether what teachers say they do when they teach is in accordance with their actual classroom practice. The effectiveness of the instrument will be explained via specific findings from a multiple-case study undertaken with Grade 3 and 4 learners between 2015 and 2017 at two schools in the Midlands area of KwaZulu-Natal. The study involved a total of eight teachers and their classes, while the researchers recorded a total of 34 lessons, most of which were taught in English and some in isiZulu, with class sizes ranging between 35 and 45 learners. Findings indicate that additional training alone may be insufficient to change embedded top-down and teacher-led teaching styles and that teachers may benefit more from on-going support and mentoring such as coaching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"29-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5785/35-3-806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5785/35-3-806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文的重点是一种被称为阅读教学促进导向(Facilitative Orientation to Reading Teaching, FORT)的工具,该工具旨在捕捉教师的教学内容知识(pedagogical content knowledge, PCK)如何影响基础阶段的识字习得。FORT可以捕捉课堂实践的“内容”和“频率”,当与定性数据相结合时,它可以提供“原因”,并确定教师在教学时所说的是否与他们的实际课堂实践相一致。该工具的有效性将通过2015年至2017年在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省中部地区的两所学校对三年级和四年级学生进行的多案例研究的具体结果来解释。这项研究共涉及8位教师和他们的班级,研究人员共记录了34节课,其中大部分用英语授课,有些用伊苏鲁语授课,每班人数在35到45人之间。研究结果表明,仅靠额外的培训可能不足以改变固有的自上而下和教师主导的教学风格,教师可能从持续的支持和指导(如辅导)中获益更多。
Securing the fort: Capturing reading pedagogy in the Foundation Phase
The focus of this paper is on an instrument known as the Facilitative Orientation to Reading Teaching, or FORT, that was designed to capture how teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) can influence literacy acquisition at Foundation Phase level. T he FORT can capture the ‘what’ and ‘how often’ of classroom practice and, when combined with qualitative data, it can provide the ‘why’ and also ascertain whether what teachers say they do when they teach is in accordance with their actual classroom practice. The effectiveness of the instrument will be explained via specific findings from a multiple-case study undertaken with Grade 3 and 4 learners between 2015 and 2017 at two schools in the Midlands area of KwaZulu-Natal. The study involved a total of eight teachers and their classes, while the researchers recorded a total of 34 lessons, most of which were taught in English and some in isiZulu, with class sizes ranging between 35 and 45 learners. Findings indicate that additional training alone may be insufficient to change embedded top-down and teacher-led teaching styles and that teachers may benefit more from on-going support and mentoring such as coaching.