不同需求条件下自动驾驶汽车混合交通性能研究

M. Azam, S.A. Hassan, O.C. Puan, S.F. Azhari, R.U. Faiz
{"title":"不同需求条件下自动驾驶汽车混合交通性能研究","authors":"M. Azam, S.A. Hassan, O.C. Puan, S.F. Azhari, R.U. Faiz","doi":"10.15282/ijame.19.4.2022.02.0776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) are considered one of the potential solutions to future urban mobility with several promised benefits regarding safety and traffic operation. Despite of expected benefits, these vehicles will take decades to have full market penetration and before that, AVs will co-exist with Conventional Vehicles (CVs), which may affect the performance of AVs owing to different driving logic than CVs. The aim of this study is to quantify the impacts of varying penetrations of AVs when introduced in mixed traffic conditions. The study employed simulation environment VISSIM to study the different scenarios based on the percentage of AVs in mixed traffic, category of AVs and varying demand levels. The findings show that at lower demand levels (1000 veh/hr and 2000 veh/hr), CVs and three categories of AVs produced similar results. However, cautious and normal AVs negatively affect traffic operations when the demand level is increased. At demand-3 (3000 veh/hr), the penetration rates of cautious AVs greater than 50% shows negative impact on performance. At demand-4 (4000 veh/hr), even a small proportion (25%) of cautious AVs can negatively affect performance, and a similar effect is observed for normal AVs with a penetration rate greater than 75%. For speed, the minimum reduction with the increase in demand is observed for aggressive AVs, followed by conventional vehicles, normal AVs and cautious AVs. It can be concluded that the aggressive AVs produced better delays, queue length, speed and conflicts than CVs, cautious AVs and normal AVs at the highest demand levels.","PeriodicalId":13935,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic under different Demand Conditions\",\"authors\":\"M. Azam, S.A. Hassan, O.C. Puan, S.F. Azhari, R.U. Faiz\",\"doi\":\"10.15282/ijame.19.4.2022.02.0776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) are considered one of the potential solutions to future urban mobility with several promised benefits regarding safety and traffic operation. Despite of expected benefits, these vehicles will take decades to have full market penetration and before that, AVs will co-exist with Conventional Vehicles (CVs), which may affect the performance of AVs owing to different driving logic than CVs. The aim of this study is to quantify the impacts of varying penetrations of AVs when introduced in mixed traffic conditions. The study employed simulation environment VISSIM to study the different scenarios based on the percentage of AVs in mixed traffic, category of AVs and varying demand levels. The findings show that at lower demand levels (1000 veh/hr and 2000 veh/hr), CVs and three categories of AVs produced similar results. However, cautious and normal AVs negatively affect traffic operations when the demand level is increased. At demand-3 (3000 veh/hr), the penetration rates of cautious AVs greater than 50% shows negative impact on performance. At demand-4 (4000 veh/hr), even a small proportion (25%) of cautious AVs can negatively affect performance, and a similar effect is observed for normal AVs with a penetration rate greater than 75%. For speed, the minimum reduction with the increase in demand is observed for aggressive AVs, followed by conventional vehicles, normal AVs and cautious AVs. It can be concluded that the aggressive AVs produced better delays, queue length, speed and conflicts than CVs, cautious AVs and normal AVs at the highest demand levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.4.2022.02.0776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.4.2022.02.0776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自动驾驶汽车(AVs)被认为是未来城市交通的潜在解决方案之一,在安全和交通运行方面有许多好处。尽管有预期的好处,但这些车辆需要几十年的时间才能完全进入市场,在此之前,自动驾驶汽车将与传统汽车共存,这可能会影响自动驾驶汽车的性能,因为驾驶逻辑与传统汽车不同。本研究的目的是量化自动驾驶汽车在混合交通条件下不同渗透率的影响。本研究采用VISSIM仿真环境,根据混合交通中自动驾驶汽车的比例、自动驾驶汽车的类别和不同的需求水平,对不同的场景进行研究。研究结果表明,在较低的需求水平(1000和2000 veh/hr)下,cv和三种类型的自动驾驶汽车产生了相似的结果。然而,当需求水平增加时,谨慎和正常的自动驾驶汽车会对交通运营产生负面影响。在需求3 (3000 veh/hr)时,谨慎型自动驾驶汽车的渗透率大于50%,对性能产生负面影响。在需求-4 (4000 veh/hr)时,即使一小部分(25%)谨慎的自动驾驶汽车也会对性能产生负面影响,对于渗透率大于75%的普通自动驾驶汽车也会产生类似的影响。在速度方面,随着需求的增加,攻击性自动驾驶汽车的下降幅度最小,其次是传统汽车、普通自动驾驶汽车和谨慎型自动驾驶汽车。可以得出结论,在最高需求水平下,激进型自动驾驶比cv、谨慎型自动驾驶和正常型自动驾驶产生更好的延迟、排队长度、速度和冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of Autonomous Vehicles in Mixed Traffic under different Demand Conditions
Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) are considered one of the potential solutions to future urban mobility with several promised benefits regarding safety and traffic operation. Despite of expected benefits, these vehicles will take decades to have full market penetration and before that, AVs will co-exist with Conventional Vehicles (CVs), which may affect the performance of AVs owing to different driving logic than CVs. The aim of this study is to quantify the impacts of varying penetrations of AVs when introduced in mixed traffic conditions. The study employed simulation environment VISSIM to study the different scenarios based on the percentage of AVs in mixed traffic, category of AVs and varying demand levels. The findings show that at lower demand levels (1000 veh/hr and 2000 veh/hr), CVs and three categories of AVs produced similar results. However, cautious and normal AVs negatively affect traffic operations when the demand level is increased. At demand-3 (3000 veh/hr), the penetration rates of cautious AVs greater than 50% shows negative impact on performance. At demand-4 (4000 veh/hr), even a small proportion (25%) of cautious AVs can negatively affect performance, and a similar effect is observed for normal AVs with a penetration rate greater than 75%. For speed, the minimum reduction with the increase in demand is observed for aggressive AVs, followed by conventional vehicles, normal AVs and cautious AVs. It can be concluded that the aggressive AVs produced better delays, queue length, speed and conflicts than CVs, cautious AVs and normal AVs at the highest demand levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJAME provides the forum for high-quality research communications and addresses all aspects of original experimental information based on theory and their applications. This journal welcomes all contributions from those who wish to report on new developments in automotive and mechanical engineering fields within the following scopes. -Engine/Emission Technology Automobile Body and Safety- Vehicle Dynamics- Automotive Electronics- Alternative Energy- Energy Conversion- Fuels and Lubricants - Combustion and Reacting Flows- New and Renewable Energy Technologies- Automotive Electrical Systems- Automotive Materials- Automotive Transmission- Automotive Pollution and Control- Vehicle Maintenance- Intelligent Vehicle/Transportation Systems- Fuel Cell, Hybrid, Electrical Vehicle and Other Fields of Automotive Engineering- Engineering Management /TQM- Heat and Mass Transfer- Fluid and Thermal Engineering- CAE/FEA/CAD/CFD- Engineering Mechanics- Modeling and Simulation- Metallurgy/ Materials Engineering- Applied Mechanics- Thermodynamics- Agricultural Machinery and Equipment- Mechatronics- Automatic Control- Multidisciplinary design and optimization - Fluid Mechanics and Dynamics- Thermal-Fluids Machinery- Experimental and Computational Mechanics - Measurement and Instrumentation- HVAC- Manufacturing Systems- Materials Processing- Noise and Vibration- Composite and Polymer Materials- Biomechanical Engineering- Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics- Machine Components design- Gas Turbine- Power Plant Engineering- Artificial Intelligent/Neural Network- Robotic Systems- Solar Energy- Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics- Discrete Systems- Non-linear Analysis- Structural Analysis- Tribology- Engineering Materials- Mechanical Systems and Technology- Pneumatic and Hydraulic Systems - Failure Analysis- Any other related topics.
期刊最新文献
Tribology Evaluation on a Four-Ball Tribometer Lubricated by Al2O3/PAG Nanolubricants Development of a Dynamic Hitch Lift Controller using a Hybrid Control Strategy in A Heavy Combination Vehicle Initial Study on Rheological Behaviour of Hydroxyapatites / Polylactic Acid Composite for 3D Printing Filament Compressive Strength and Elastic Modulus of a 3D Woven Glass/Polyester Fire-Retardant Sandwich Composite Enhancing Machining performance in Stainless Steel Machining using MXene Coolant: A Detailed Examination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1