一种识别RTL设计中安全相关逻辑和漏洞的有效算法

David W. Palmer, P. K. Manna
{"title":"一种识别RTL设计中安全相关逻辑和漏洞的有效算法","authors":"David W. Palmer, P. K. Manna","doi":"10.1109/HST.2013.6581567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For complex production hardware designs, a significant challenge is to decide where to look for security issues. Published approaches to information flow security analysis find all paths from signals for an asset to ports accessible by an adversary, such as a secret key to a point of disclosure. Although this can be beneficial in eliminating areas of the hardware designs that need not be reviewed, what is included is still overwhelmingly large for a proper review for security vulnerabilities. However, it is not necessary to review all of the paths, but instead to review access control mechanisms that limit information flow between adversary and asset. Our method of using multiple information flow paths allows us to identify access control mechanisms and evaluate whether they are used on every access to the asset. Our technique was used commercially in production hardware design to successfully find critical security issues before tape-in by pre-Si validation engineers at Intel.","PeriodicalId":6337,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST)","volume":"283 1","pages":"61-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An efficient algorithm for identifying security relevant logic and vulnerabilities in RTL designs\",\"authors\":\"David W. Palmer, P. K. Manna\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HST.2013.6581567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For complex production hardware designs, a significant challenge is to decide where to look for security issues. Published approaches to information flow security analysis find all paths from signals for an asset to ports accessible by an adversary, such as a secret key to a point of disclosure. Although this can be beneficial in eliminating areas of the hardware designs that need not be reviewed, what is included is still overwhelmingly large for a proper review for security vulnerabilities. However, it is not necessary to review all of the paths, but instead to review access control mechanisms that limit information flow between adversary and asset. Our method of using multiple information flow paths allows us to identify access control mechanisms and evaluate whether they are used on every access to the asset. Our technique was used commercially in production hardware design to successfully find critical security issues before tape-in by pre-Si validation engineers at Intel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST)\",\"volume\":\"283 1\",\"pages\":\"61-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HST.2013.6581567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HST.2013.6581567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

对于复杂的生产硬件设计,一个重要的挑战是决定在哪里寻找安全问题。已发布的信息流安全分析方法可以找到从资产信号到攻击者可访问的端口的所有路径,例如从密钥到泄露点。尽管这有助于消除硬件设计中不需要审查的部分,但是所包含的内容对于安全漏洞的适当审查来说仍然是非常大的。但是,没有必要检查所有的路径,而是检查限制攻击者和资产之间信息流的访问控制机制。我们使用多个信息流路径的方法允许我们识别访问控制机制,并评估它们是否用于对资产的每次访问。我们的技术被商业化地用于生产硬件设计,在英特尔的pre-Si验证工程师带进之前成功地发现了关键的安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An efficient algorithm for identifying security relevant logic and vulnerabilities in RTL designs
For complex production hardware designs, a significant challenge is to decide where to look for security issues. Published approaches to information flow security analysis find all paths from signals for an asset to ports accessible by an adversary, such as a secret key to a point of disclosure. Although this can be beneficial in eliminating areas of the hardware designs that need not be reviewed, what is included is still overwhelmingly large for a proper review for security vulnerabilities. However, it is not necessary to review all of the paths, but instead to review access control mechanisms that limit information flow between adversary and asset. Our method of using multiple information flow paths allows us to identify access control mechanisms and evaluate whether they are used on every access to the asset. Our technique was used commercially in production hardware design to successfully find critical security issues before tape-in by pre-Si validation engineers at Intel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cycle-accurate information assurance by proof-carrying based signal sensitivity tracing Model building attacks on Physically Unclonable Functions using genetic programming Intellectual property protection for FPGA designs with soft physical hash functions: First experimental results Error-tolerant bit generation techniques for use with a hardware-embedded path delay PUF An efficient algorithm for identifying security relevant logic and vulnerabilities in RTL designs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1