美国的新内战

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY Telos Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3817/0322198125
P. Kahn
{"title":"美国的新内战","authors":"P. Kahn","doi":"10.3817/0322198125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A year into the Biden administration, America remains up for grabs. Trump supporters do not accept the legitimacy of the Biden presidency.1 Trump himself is already campaigning for reelection on a platform of revenge for a stolen victory. Congress remains bitterly divided; gerrymandering and voting restrictions race forward to create lopsided advantages before the 2022 elections.2 And the Supreme Court–dominated by three Trump appointees who together got only four votes of Democratic senators–continues its reactionary turn.3 Almost everyone believes our national political system is broken. Surely, it strains credulity to think that we are a democracy, if we mean by that a system in which the majority of the citizens choose their representatives who, in turn, aim to translate public opinion into public policy.4","PeriodicalId":43573,"journal":{"name":"Telos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"America’s New Civil War\",\"authors\":\"P. Kahn\",\"doi\":\"10.3817/0322198125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A year into the Biden administration, America remains up for grabs. Trump supporters do not accept the legitimacy of the Biden presidency.1 Trump himself is already campaigning for reelection on a platform of revenge for a stolen victory. Congress remains bitterly divided; gerrymandering and voting restrictions race forward to create lopsided advantages before the 2022 elections.2 And the Supreme Court–dominated by three Trump appointees who together got only four votes of Democratic senators–continues its reactionary turn.3 Almost everyone believes our national political system is broken. Surely, it strains credulity to think that we are a democracy, if we mean by that a system in which the majority of the citizens choose their representatives who, in turn, aim to translate public opinion into public policy.4\",\"PeriodicalId\":43573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3817/0322198125\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3817/0322198125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拜登执政一年后,美国仍处于争夺之中。特朗普的支持者不接受拜登担任总统的合法性特朗普本人已经在竞选连任了,他的竞选纲领是为偷来的胜利复仇。国会仍然存在严重分歧;在2022年大选之前,不公正的选区划分和投票限制正在加速创造不平衡的优势最高法院——由特朗普任命的三名官员主导,他们加起来只获得了民主党参议员的四票——继续走向反动几乎每个人都认为我们的国家政治制度已经崩溃。当然,我们很难相信我们是一个民主国家,如果我们所说的民主是指一个由大多数公民选择他们的代表,而这些代表又旨在将民意转化为公共政策的制度的话
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
America’s New Civil War
A year into the Biden administration, America remains up for grabs. Trump supporters do not accept the legitimacy of the Biden presidency.1 Trump himself is already campaigning for reelection on a platform of revenge for a stolen victory. Congress remains bitterly divided; gerrymandering and voting restrictions race forward to create lopsided advantages before the 2022 elections.2 And the Supreme Court–dominated by three Trump appointees who together got only four votes of Democratic senators–continues its reactionary turn.3 Almost everyone believes our national political system is broken. Surely, it strains credulity to think that we are a democracy, if we mean by that a system in which the majority of the citizens choose their representatives who, in turn, aim to translate public opinion into public policy.4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telos
Telos Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The Early Christian Origins of Secularization Nationality of Food: Cultural Politics on the UNESCO List of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Food Museums Horizontality vs. Verticality: New Readings in the Understanding of Religion and the Organizing of Politics In Memoriam: Fred Siegel Islam and the Promotion of Human Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1