V. C. Chia, A. Wei, Cynthia Villalobos, N. Laskosky, C. Jensen
{"title":"学业压力和骨骼肌性能之间的关系:3367板#272 6月23日","authors":"V. C. Chia, A. Wei, Cynthia Villalobos, N. Laskosky, C. Jensen","doi":"10.1249/01.mss.0000519633.59031.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Student athletes are required to perform both in the classroom and on the field; balancing these commitments can be stressful. It is common to question the burden of athletic demands on student scholarship. However, the inverse is seldom asked: how do scholastic stresses affect athletic performance? PURPOSE: To test the effect of psychological stress on skeletal muscle performance in college students. METHODS: We enrolled 23 recreationally active students (10 men, 13 women) from a D1 university. Skeletal muscle function was assessed via quadriceps extension and hamstring flexion using a Cybex HUMAC NORM dynamometer. Psychological stress was measured with the Cohen Perceived Stress Scale. Subjects were evaluated at two time points: a high stress period (exams) and a low stress period (no exams). A history of injury excluded subjects from participation; nightly sleep, history of exercise, and recent exercise were controlled. Independent variables were stress, sex, age, weight, BMI, academic load, and participation in organized sports (club or intramural). Dependent variables were peak torque (ft/lb) and time to achieve peak torque (sec). Differences in muscle performance between high and low stress periods were assessed with t-tests. Linear regressions analyzed the effect of psychological stress on muscle performance. RESULTS: Subjects were 20.2 ± 1.1 years old, had peak flexor torque of 87.4 ± 19.7 ft/lb (achieved in 0.58 ± 0.12 sec), and peak extensor torque of 145.2 ± 37.5 ft/lb (achieved in 0.58 ± 0.15 sec). T-tests found no differences between low and high stress periods in peak torque or time to achieve peak torque (p>0.090). Linear regression found increases in psychological stress to correlate with improvements in the overall rate of force development (p=0.004). The effect was strongest with flexors: for each point that stress increased, time to achieve peak torque was 2.4% faster (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Despite a small sample size, these findings suggest psychological stress may enhance force development. A possible mechanism could be sympatheticallymediated potentiation of calcium release. While academic stress presents many challenges for student-athletes, it does not appear to be detrimental to muscular performance.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Academic Stress and Skeletal Muscle Performance: 3367 Board #272 June 2 3\",\"authors\":\"V. C. Chia, A. Wei, Cynthia Villalobos, N. Laskosky, C. Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/01.mss.0000519633.59031.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Student athletes are required to perform both in the classroom and on the field; balancing these commitments can be stressful. It is common to question the burden of athletic demands on student scholarship. However, the inverse is seldom asked: how do scholastic stresses affect athletic performance? PURPOSE: To test the effect of psychological stress on skeletal muscle performance in college students. METHODS: We enrolled 23 recreationally active students (10 men, 13 women) from a D1 university. Skeletal muscle function was assessed via quadriceps extension and hamstring flexion using a Cybex HUMAC NORM dynamometer. Psychological stress was measured with the Cohen Perceived Stress Scale. Subjects were evaluated at two time points: a high stress period (exams) and a low stress period (no exams). A history of injury excluded subjects from participation; nightly sleep, history of exercise, and recent exercise were controlled. Independent variables were stress, sex, age, weight, BMI, academic load, and participation in organized sports (club or intramural). Dependent variables were peak torque (ft/lb) and time to achieve peak torque (sec). Differences in muscle performance between high and low stress periods were assessed with t-tests. Linear regressions analyzed the effect of psychological stress on muscle performance. RESULTS: Subjects were 20.2 ± 1.1 years old, had peak flexor torque of 87.4 ± 19.7 ft/lb (achieved in 0.58 ± 0.12 sec), and peak extensor torque of 145.2 ± 37.5 ft/lb (achieved in 0.58 ± 0.15 sec). T-tests found no differences between low and high stress periods in peak torque or time to achieve peak torque (p>0.090). Linear regression found increases in psychological stress to correlate with improvements in the overall rate of force development (p=0.004). The effect was strongest with flexors: for each point that stress increased, time to achieve peak torque was 2.4% faster (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Despite a small sample size, these findings suggest psychological stress may enhance force development. A possible mechanism could be sympatheticallymediated potentiation of calcium release. While academic stress presents many challenges for student-athletes, it does not appear to be detrimental to muscular performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000519633.59031.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000519633.59031.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Relationship Between Academic Stress and Skeletal Muscle Performance: 3367 Board #272 June 2 3
Student athletes are required to perform both in the classroom and on the field; balancing these commitments can be stressful. It is common to question the burden of athletic demands on student scholarship. However, the inverse is seldom asked: how do scholastic stresses affect athletic performance? PURPOSE: To test the effect of psychological stress on skeletal muscle performance in college students. METHODS: We enrolled 23 recreationally active students (10 men, 13 women) from a D1 university. Skeletal muscle function was assessed via quadriceps extension and hamstring flexion using a Cybex HUMAC NORM dynamometer. Psychological stress was measured with the Cohen Perceived Stress Scale. Subjects were evaluated at two time points: a high stress period (exams) and a low stress period (no exams). A history of injury excluded subjects from participation; nightly sleep, history of exercise, and recent exercise were controlled. Independent variables were stress, sex, age, weight, BMI, academic load, and participation in organized sports (club or intramural). Dependent variables were peak torque (ft/lb) and time to achieve peak torque (sec). Differences in muscle performance between high and low stress periods were assessed with t-tests. Linear regressions analyzed the effect of psychological stress on muscle performance. RESULTS: Subjects were 20.2 ± 1.1 years old, had peak flexor torque of 87.4 ± 19.7 ft/lb (achieved in 0.58 ± 0.12 sec), and peak extensor torque of 145.2 ± 37.5 ft/lb (achieved in 0.58 ± 0.15 sec). T-tests found no differences between low and high stress periods in peak torque or time to achieve peak torque (p>0.090). Linear regression found increases in psychological stress to correlate with improvements in the overall rate of force development (p=0.004). The effect was strongest with flexors: for each point that stress increased, time to achieve peak torque was 2.4% faster (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Despite a small sample size, these findings suggest psychological stress may enhance force development. A possible mechanism could be sympatheticallymediated potentiation of calcium release. While academic stress presents many challenges for student-athletes, it does not appear to be detrimental to muscular performance.