抓住达摩克利斯之剑:丹麦向后马尔萨斯时代的过渡

IF 2.6 1区 历史学 Q1 ECONOMICS Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eeh.2021.101437
Peter Sandholt Jensen , Maja Uhre Pedersen , Cristina Victoria Radu , Paul Richard Sharp
{"title":"抓住达摩克利斯之剑:丹麦向后马尔萨斯时代的过渡","authors":"Peter Sandholt Jensen ,&nbsp;Maja Uhre Pedersen ,&nbsp;Cristina Victoria Radu ,&nbsp;Paul Richard Sharp","doi":"10.1016/j.eeh.2021.101437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Malthusian model is the subject of a fierce debate within economic history. Although the positive causal relationship postulated from living standards to population growth is relatively uncontroversial for preindustrial societies, this cannot be said for the other key relationship, diminishing returns due to fixed supplies of land. We argue that Denmark, which was characterized by extreme resource and environmental constraints until the final decades of the eighteenth century, provides an ideal setting for testing whether any society was ever truly Malthusian. We employ a cointegrated VAR model on Danish data from 1731 to 1800, finding evidence for diminishing returns until ca. 1775. Yet this relationship disappears in the late-eighteenth century, consistent with an increasing pace of technological progress and the emergence of what Unified Growth Theory has termed the “post-Malthusian” era.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47413,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in Economic History","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014498321000644/pdfft?md5=38ad7a2a572ee9e67c1d3b316c87ca68&pid=1-s2.0-S0014498321000644-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arresting the Sword of Damocles: The transition to the post-Malthusian era in Denmark\",\"authors\":\"Peter Sandholt Jensen ,&nbsp;Maja Uhre Pedersen ,&nbsp;Cristina Victoria Radu ,&nbsp;Paul Richard Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eeh.2021.101437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Malthusian model is the subject of a fierce debate within economic history. Although the positive causal relationship postulated from living standards to population growth is relatively uncontroversial for preindustrial societies, this cannot be said for the other key relationship, diminishing returns due to fixed supplies of land. We argue that Denmark, which was characterized by extreme resource and environmental constraints until the final decades of the eighteenth century, provides an ideal setting for testing whether any society was ever truly Malthusian. We employ a cointegrated VAR model on Danish data from 1731 to 1800, finding evidence for diminishing returns until ca. 1775. Yet this relationship disappears in the late-eighteenth century, consistent with an increasing pace of technological progress and the emergence of what Unified Growth Theory has termed the “post-Malthusian” era.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Explorations in Economic History\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014498321000644/pdfft?md5=38ad7a2a572ee9e67c1d3b316c87ca68&pid=1-s2.0-S0014498321000644-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Explorations in Economic History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014498321000644\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explorations in Economic History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014498321000644","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

马尔萨斯模型是经济史上激烈争论的主题。虽然假定的生活水平与人口增长之间的正因果关系对于前工业化社会来说是相对没有争议的,但对于另一个关键关系,即固定土地供应导致的收益递减,就不能这么说了。我们认为,直到18世纪最后几十年,丹麦的特点是极度的资源和环境限制,这为检验是否有任何社会曾经是真正的马尔萨斯社会提供了一个理想的环境。我们对1731年至1800年的丹麦数据采用协整VAR模型,找到了直到大约1775年收益递减的证据。然而,随着技术进步步伐的加快和统一增长理论所称的“后马尔萨斯”时代的出现,这种关系在18世纪晚期消失了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arresting the Sword of Damocles: The transition to the post-Malthusian era in Denmark

The Malthusian model is the subject of a fierce debate within economic history. Although the positive causal relationship postulated from living standards to population growth is relatively uncontroversial for preindustrial societies, this cannot be said for the other key relationship, diminishing returns due to fixed supplies of land. We argue that Denmark, which was characterized by extreme resource and environmental constraints until the final decades of the eighteenth century, provides an ideal setting for testing whether any society was ever truly Malthusian. We employ a cointegrated VAR model on Danish data from 1731 to 1800, finding evidence for diminishing returns until ca. 1775. Yet this relationship disappears in the late-eighteenth century, consistent with an increasing pace of technological progress and the emergence of what Unified Growth Theory has termed the “post-Malthusian” era.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Explorations in Economic History provides broad coverage of the application of economic analysis to historical episodes. The journal has a tradition of innovative applications of theory and quantitative techniques, and it explores all aspects of economic change, all historical periods, all geographical locations, and all political and social systems. The journal includes papers by economists, economic historians, demographers, geographers, and sociologists. Explorations in Economic History is the only journal where you will find "Essays in Exploration." This unique department alerts economic historians to the potential in a new area of research, surveying the recent literature and then identifying the most promising issues to pursue.
期刊最新文献
Monumental effects: Confederate monuments in the Post-Reconstruction South Wealth and history: A reappraisal Family first: Defining, constructing, and applying historical patent families Reservoirs of power: The political legacy of dam construction in Franco’s Spain (In-kind) Wages and labour relations in the Middle Ages: It’s not (all) about the money
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1