实时选择程序的探索性研究

E. Furrebøe, P. Holth, Ingunn Sandaker
{"title":"实时选择程序的探索性研究","authors":"E. Furrebøe, P. Holth, Ingunn Sandaker","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2019.1575033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this exploratory study, we expand the research on choice using real outcomes in real-time settings. The object is to refine a method for examining the reinforcing contingencies in discounting, for which real rather than hypothetical settings are necessary. In the experiments, adult human participants chose between a smaller-sooner (SS) and a larger-later (LL) alternative, with an adjusting real delay to LL. We examined the use of points as the outcome and tested conditions concerning amount of outcome and delay. Second, we analyzed how differences in criteria for establishing an Indifference Point (IP) might determine the location of the IP. Finally, we performed a control experiment, introducing a decreasing delay and post-experimental questions, to determine whether the choices were a result of the adjusting delay or by molar considerations. This study gives support to the use of points as reinforcers and delay of seconds in discounting studies on human adults.","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploratory study of a real-time choice procedure\",\"authors\":\"E. Furrebøe, P. Holth, Ingunn Sandaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15021149.2019.1575033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this exploratory study, we expand the research on choice using real outcomes in real-time settings. The object is to refine a method for examining the reinforcing contingencies in discounting, for which real rather than hypothetical settings are necessary. In the experiments, adult human participants chose between a smaller-sooner (SS) and a larger-later (LL) alternative, with an adjusting real delay to LL. We examined the use of points as the outcome and tested conditions concerning amount of outcome and delay. Second, we analyzed how differences in criteria for establishing an Indifference Point (IP) might determine the location of the IP. Finally, we performed a control experiment, introducing a decreasing delay and post-experimental questions, to determine whether the choices were a result of the adjusting delay or by molar considerations. This study gives support to the use of points as reinforcers and delay of seconds in discounting studies on human adults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2019.1575033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2019.1575033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这一探索性研究中,我们使用实时设置的真实结果扩展了对选择的研究。目的是完善一种方法来检查在贴现强化偶然性,其中真实的而不是假设的设置是必要的。在实验中,成年人类参与者在较小的早一点(SS)和较大的晚一点(LL)之间进行选择,并将实际延迟调整为LL。我们检查了使用点作为结果,并测试了有关结果量和延迟的条件。其次,我们分析了建立无差异点(IP)的标准差异如何确定IP的位置。最后,我们进行了一个控制实验,引入了一个递减的延迟和实验后的问题,以确定这些选择是由调整延迟还是由摩尔考虑的结果。本研究支持在成人贴现研究中使用点作为强化物和秒延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An exploratory study of a real-time choice procedure
ABSTRACT In this exploratory study, we expand the research on choice using real outcomes in real-time settings. The object is to refine a method for examining the reinforcing contingencies in discounting, for which real rather than hypothetical settings are necessary. In the experiments, adult human participants chose between a smaller-sooner (SS) and a larger-later (LL) alternative, with an adjusting real delay to LL. We examined the use of points as the outcome and tested conditions concerning amount of outcome and delay. Second, we analyzed how differences in criteria for establishing an Indifference Point (IP) might determine the location of the IP. Finally, we performed a control experiment, introducing a decreasing delay and post-experimental questions, to determine whether the choices were a result of the adjusting delay or by molar considerations. This study gives support to the use of points as reinforcers and delay of seconds in discounting studies on human adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Behavior Analysis
European Journal of Behavior Analysis Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Examining implicit and explicit anti-Black racial bias in children: A repeated measure design using the Function Acquisition Speed Test (FAST) Where engagement happens: Parent perspectives on engagement in behavioural interventions Gather ‘round and listen close: Increasing responding to voices in children with autism Comparing the stimulus-pairing yes/no procedure to match-to-sample to establish equivalence classes with adults Geographic affiliation of authors and cooperative research in the Mexican , European , and Brazilian journal of behavior analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1