Pub Date : 2024-08-08DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2024.2388487
Denise Aparecida Passarelli, T. M. Mizael, Marcello Henrique Silvestre, J. D. de Rose
{"title":"Examining implicit and explicit anti-Black racial bias in children: A repeated measure design using the Function Acquisition Speed Test (FAST)","authors":"Denise Aparecida Passarelli, T. M. Mizael, Marcello Henrique Silvestre, J. D. de Rose","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2024.2388487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2024.2388487","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141929556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-09DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2024.2348848
JeanneMarie Speckman, Lin Du, Yifei Sun
{"title":"Gather ‘round and listen close: Increasing responding to voices in children with autism","authors":"JeanneMarie Speckman, Lin Du, Yifei Sun","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2024.2348848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2024.2348848","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140996220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-06DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2024.2324508
Sarah A. Hensel, Alexandra M. Cicero, Christopher R. Colasurdo, K. Reeve, Karly Stepper, Sharon A. Reeve, Ruth M. DeBar
{"title":"Comparing the stimulus-pairing yes/no procedure to match-to-sample to establish equivalence classes with adults","authors":"Sarah A. Hensel, Alexandra M. Cicero, Christopher R. Colasurdo, K. Reeve, Karly Stepper, Sharon A. Reeve, Ruth M. DeBar","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2024.2324508","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2024.2324508","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140262341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2024.2324509
Hugo Curiel, Emily S. L. Curiel, Joey Ryan, Katarina Rotta, Alicia Roca, Alan Poling
{"title":"Geographic affiliation of authors and cooperative research in the\u0000 Mexican\u0000 ,\u0000 European\u0000 , and\u0000 Brazilian journal of behavior analysis","authors":"Hugo Curiel, Emily S. L. Curiel, Joey Ryan, Katarina Rotta, Alicia Roca, Alan Poling","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2024.2324509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2024.2324509","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140090082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-31DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2024.2309416
Ashley N. Creem, Amy R. Bukszpan, Jessica L. Piazza, Dena Wasserman, Asim Javed, Justin B. Leaf, Joseph H. Cihon, Amanda N Kelly, M. S. Saunders, Melissa L. Olive, J. L. Ferguson, Christine M. Milne, Robert K Ross, Mary Jane Weiss
{"title":"Scrolling into trouble: Navigating social media’s pitfalls with applied behavior analysts","authors":"Ashley N. Creem, Amy R. Bukszpan, Jessica L. Piazza, Dena Wasserman, Asim Javed, Justin B. Leaf, Joseph H. Cihon, Amanda N Kelly, M. S. Saunders, Melissa L. Olive, J. L. Ferguson, Christine M. Milne, Robert K Ross, Mary Jane Weiss","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2024.2309416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2024.2309416","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140475571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2023.2297332
Benjamin S. Riden, Salvador Ruiz, Andrew M Markelz, Peter Sturmey, John C. Ward-Horner, Colleen Fowkes, Kristin Wikel, Argnue Chitiyo, Madelaine Williams
{"title":"The component analysis experimental method: A mapping of the literature base","authors":"Benjamin S. Riden, Salvador Ruiz, Andrew M Markelz, Peter Sturmey, John C. Ward-Horner, Colleen Fowkes, Kristin Wikel, Argnue Chitiyo, Madelaine Williams","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2023.2297332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2023.2297332","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139614662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-17DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2023.2269340
Live F. Braaten, Erik Arntzen
Meaningful stimuli interspersed with abstract stimuli increase the probability of establishing conditional discriminations and responding according to stimulus equivalence in a matching-to-sample procedure, compared to procedures with only abstract stimuli. Test accuracy and reaction time have been previous experiments’ primary dependent variables. However, contemporary research on stimulus equivalence has also included eye movement measures as a means of a fine-grained analysis of behavior. The present experiment investigates meaningful stimuli’s effect on eye movements. The present experiment was arranged as a group design, with 30 adult participants allocated in three groups. All learned 12 conditional discriminations in a one-to-many training structure before testing to establish three 5-member stimulus equivalence classes. One group was trained with meaningful sample stimuli, one with meaningful comparison stimuli, and one with all abstract stimuli. Results show significant differences in fixation durations and gaze transitions between the groups with meaningful stimuli and those with all abstract stimuli in the test for stimulus equivalence. Hence, measuring eye movements with eye-tracking technology can provide information about behavioral differences between conditions not obtained with accuracy scores.
{"title":"The effect of meaningful stimuli on eye movements in stimulus equivalence class formation","authors":"Live F. Braaten, Erik Arntzen","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2023.2269340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2023.2269340","url":null,"abstract":"Meaningful stimuli interspersed with abstract stimuli increase the probability of establishing conditional discriminations and responding according to stimulus equivalence in a matching-to-sample procedure, compared to procedures with only abstract stimuli. Test accuracy and reaction time have been previous experiments’ primary dependent variables. However, contemporary research on stimulus equivalence has also included eye movement measures as a means of a fine-grained analysis of behavior. The present experiment investigates meaningful stimuli’s effect on eye movements. The present experiment was arranged as a group design, with 30 adult participants allocated in three groups. All learned 12 conditional discriminations in a one-to-many training structure before testing to establish three 5-member stimulus equivalence classes. One group was trained with meaningful sample stimuli, one with meaningful comparison stimuli, and one with all abstract stimuli. Results show significant differences in fixation durations and gaze transitions between the groups with meaningful stimuli and those with all abstract stimuli in the test for stimulus equivalence. Hence, measuring eye movements with eye-tracking technology can provide information about behavioral differences between conditions not obtained with accuracy scores.","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135993979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-05DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2023.2267345
Thom Ratkos, Mikayla Camacho, Kamryn O’Dell
ABSTRACTExplanations of delayed stimulus control (e.g., delayed matching-to-sample, sequencing stimuli under the control of spoken instructions) and other instances of joint control often rely on “mediating” behavior, typically echoic responses occurring throughout the delay, to explain how stimuli no longer present can control behavior. While covert mediation itself cannot be observed, several researchers have looked at different procedures that disrupt potential performance by “blocking” presumed covert mediation by engaging in unrelated overt verbal behavior to tell us more about the nature of this putative mediation. In this study, preschool-aged children were taught to tact pictures of familiar objects and select them from an array of eight. During delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) trials, participants were required to either talk to the experimenter, look at distractor pictures, or match figures using a tangram toy. The type of “blocking” activity during the delay was manipulated in a test-retest multiple treatment design, and the resulting DMTS performance was compared. With some individual differences, the distractor task assumedly most incompatible with covert verbal rehearsal, a conversational interview, was the least disruptive to performance. These data suggest refraining from assuming performance reductions during “blocking” are caused by incompatibility with covert mediation.KEYWORDS: Covert behaviorprivate eventsjoint controldelayed matching-to-sampleverbal behaviormediation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Compliance with ethical standardsThe authors have no known conflicts of interest. This study’s procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research at our institution and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All participants assented to the study and their parent/guardian gave their informed consent.
{"title":"Disrupting delayed matching-to-sample performance with varied distractor tasks","authors":"Thom Ratkos, Mikayla Camacho, Kamryn O’Dell","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2023.2267345","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2023.2267345","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTExplanations of delayed stimulus control (e.g., delayed matching-to-sample, sequencing stimuli under the control of spoken instructions) and other instances of joint control often rely on “mediating” behavior, typically echoic responses occurring throughout the delay, to explain how stimuli no longer present can control behavior. While covert mediation itself cannot be observed, several researchers have looked at different procedures that disrupt potential performance by “blocking” presumed covert mediation by engaging in unrelated overt verbal behavior to tell us more about the nature of this putative mediation. In this study, preschool-aged children were taught to tact pictures of familiar objects and select them from an array of eight. During delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) trials, participants were required to either talk to the experimenter, look at distractor pictures, or match figures using a tangram toy. The type of “blocking” activity during the delay was manipulated in a test-retest multiple treatment design, and the resulting DMTS performance was compared. With some individual differences, the distractor task assumedly most incompatible with covert verbal rehearsal, a conversational interview, was the least disruptive to performance. These data suggest refraining from assuming performance reductions during “blocking” are caused by incompatibility with covert mediation.KEYWORDS: Covert behaviorprivate eventsjoint controldelayed matching-to-sampleverbal behaviormediation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Compliance with ethical standardsThe authors have no known conflicts of interest. This study’s procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research at our institution and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All participants assented to the study and their parent/guardian gave their informed consent.","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134976500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-18DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2023.2259219
Tessa Taylor, Sarah Ann Taylor
ABSTRACTEmpirically supported treatment for paediatric feeding disorders is behaviour-analytic, often taking place in controlled hospital settings. We evaluated reporting of treatment processes and outcomes within behaviour-analytic studies to consider recommendations for practitioners, as well as future research. Strengths of the literature were reporting of directly observed behavioural outcome data demonstrating the effectiveness of empirically supported treatment. However, there was variability in reporting aspects of the overall treatment process. With respect to multidisciplinary involvement, gaps in reporting included the frequency of involvement in assessment and treatment, as well as the roles of each discipline involved. Further, there were gaps in reporting of treatment goal progression, such as food variety, volume, texture and independence, as well as nutritional outcomes (oral intake, growth). Our findings support recommendations to improve reporting in the literature, to increase standardisation of processes and improved dissemination to the wider research community. Further, improved research reporting will increase practitioner knowledge of empirically supported treatment for paediatric feeding disorders. To this end, we provide recommendations and resources regarding multidisciplinary involvement and systematic monitoring of treatment goal progression.KEYWORDS: Treatment progress monitoringcompetencypaediatric feeding disordersavoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID)tube weaninginappropriate mealtime behaviourmulti/interdisciplinary team Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
{"title":"Reporting treatment processes and outcomes for paediatric feeding disorders: A current view of the literature","authors":"Tessa Taylor, Sarah Ann Taylor","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2023.2259219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2023.2259219","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTEmpirically supported treatment for paediatric feeding disorders is behaviour-analytic, often taking place in controlled hospital settings. We evaluated reporting of treatment processes and outcomes within behaviour-analytic studies to consider recommendations for practitioners, as well as future research. Strengths of the literature were reporting of directly observed behavioural outcome data demonstrating the effectiveness of empirically supported treatment. However, there was variability in reporting aspects of the overall treatment process. With respect to multidisciplinary involvement, gaps in reporting included the frequency of involvement in assessment and treatment, as well as the roles of each discipline involved. Further, there were gaps in reporting of treatment goal progression, such as food variety, volume, texture and independence, as well as nutritional outcomes (oral intake, growth). Our findings support recommendations to improve reporting in the literature, to increase standardisation of processes and improved dissemination to the wider research community. Further, improved research reporting will increase practitioner knowledge of empirically supported treatment for paediatric feeding disorders. To this end, we provide recommendations and resources regarding multidisciplinary involvement and systematic monitoring of treatment goal progression.KEYWORDS: Treatment progress monitoringcompetencypaediatric feeding disordersavoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID)tube weaninginappropriate mealtime behaviourmulti/interdisciplinary team Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135150084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：