晶圆级封装的先模面朝下封装和后模扇出封装的良率比较

A. Lujan
{"title":"晶圆级封装的先模面朝下封装和后模扇出封装的良率比较","authors":"A. Lujan","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2017.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This analysis focuses on two of the primary variations of fan-out wafer level packaging: die-first packaging in which the die are placed face down, and die-last packaging. These two technologies share many of the same activities, but those activities occur in a different order. One key factor setting these two process flows apart is yield. Even with the assumption that the same level of defects are introduced in each process flow, the resulting total yield differs. This paper analyzes the impact of defects on the die-first and die-last processes. Each process is evaluated separately, then the two processes are directly compared across a range of designs, defect density assumptions, and incoming die cost assumptions. The cost of the processing, cost of the incoming die, and the cost of processing and die lost to scrap are included.","PeriodicalId":6557,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 67th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","volume":"52 1","pages":"1811-1816"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yield Comparison of Die-First Face-Down and Die-Last Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging\",\"authors\":\"A. Lujan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECTC.2017.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This analysis focuses on two of the primary variations of fan-out wafer level packaging: die-first packaging in which the die are placed face down, and die-last packaging. These two technologies share many of the same activities, but those activities occur in a different order. One key factor setting these two process flows apart is yield. Even with the assumption that the same level of defects are introduced in each process flow, the resulting total yield differs. This paper analyzes the impact of defects on the die-first and die-last processes. Each process is evaluated separately, then the two processes are directly compared across a range of designs, defect density assumptions, and incoming die cost assumptions. The cost of the processing, cost of the incoming die, and the cost of processing and die lost to scrap are included.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 67th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"1811-1816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 67th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2017.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 67th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2017.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本分析侧重于扇出晶圆级封装的两种主要变化:模具优先封装,其中模具面朝下放置,以及模具最后封装。这两种技术共享许多相同的活动,但是这些活动以不同的顺序发生。将这两种工艺流程分开的一个关键因素是产量。即使假设在每个工艺流程中引入了相同级别的缺陷,最终的总产量也是不同的。分析了缺陷对先模和后模工艺的影响。每个工艺分别进行评估,然后直接比较两个工艺的设计范围、缺陷密度假设和来料模具成本假设。加工成本、来料模具成本、加工成本和模具报废成本都包括在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Yield Comparison of Die-First Face-Down and Die-Last Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging
This analysis focuses on two of the primary variations of fan-out wafer level packaging: die-first packaging in which the die are placed face down, and die-last packaging. These two technologies share many of the same activities, but those activities occur in a different order. One key factor setting these two process flows apart is yield. Even with the assumption that the same level of defects are introduced in each process flow, the resulting total yield differs. This paper analyzes the impact of defects on the die-first and die-last processes. Each process is evaluated separately, then the two processes are directly compared across a range of designs, defect density assumptions, and incoming die cost assumptions. The cost of the processing, cost of the incoming die, and the cost of processing and die lost to scrap are included.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peridynamic Solution of Wetness Equation with Time Dependent Saturated Concentration in ANSYS Framework Axially Tapered Circular Core Polymer Optical Waveguides Enabling Highly Efficient Light Coupling Low Loss Channel-Shuffling Polymer Waveguides: Design and Fabrication Development of Packaging Technology for High Temperature Resistant SiC Module of Automobile Application 3D Packaging of Embedded Opto-Electronic Die and CMOS IC Based on Wet Etched Silicon Interposer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1