认识原因:笛卡儿论物质世界

Q4 Arts and Humanities Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2005-01-02 DOI:10.21825/philosophica.82202
P. Machamer, J. Mcguire, J. Sytsma
{"title":"认识原因:笛卡儿论物质世界","authors":"P. Machamer, J. Mcguire, J. Sytsma","doi":"10.21825/philosophica.82202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, we discuss how Descartes arrive s a t his mature vi ew of material caus ation. Descartes’ position changes over time in some very radical ways. The last section spells out his final position as to how causation works in the world of material objects. When considering Descartes’ causal theories, it is useful to distinguish between ‘vertical’ and ‘horizontal’ causation. The vertical perspective addresses God’s relation to creation. God is essential being, and every being other than God depends upon God in order to exist and to continue in existence .Thus, from the vertical perspective, the act of creating and fact of coming into existence are co-extensive notions. This metaphy sical/theological framework is the basis of Descartes’ commitment to three interrelated notions: that genuine causes and effects occur simultaneously; that causing is appropriately the case only when the cause is acting; and the view that God is the efficient, total, and continuous cause of everything that exists and every action that occurs. So from the vertical perspective, things are nothing without God’s continuous creation, and there is a problem in articulating how they are said to have independent being and causal efficacy. It is in terms of these commitments that Descartes’ views on horizontal, or material, causation must be approached. We will make apparent the radical extent to which his account of intra-worldly causation abandons his earlier and more traditional views about material causation. To this end we discuss Desca rtes’ jou rney to his mature position by emphasizing the gr owing epistemic limitations of his philosophy, which culminate in wh at we call his epistemic stance.","PeriodicalId":36843,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Philosophica","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowing causes: Descartes on the world of matter\",\"authors\":\"P. Machamer, J. Mcguire, J. Sytsma\",\"doi\":\"10.21825/philosophica.82202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay, we discuss how Descartes arrive s a t his mature vi ew of material caus ation. Descartes’ position changes over time in some very radical ways. The last section spells out his final position as to how causation works in the world of material objects. When considering Descartes’ causal theories, it is useful to distinguish between ‘vertical’ and ‘horizontal’ causation. The vertical perspective addresses God’s relation to creation. God is essential being, and every being other than God depends upon God in order to exist and to continue in existence .Thus, from the vertical perspective, the act of creating and fact of coming into existence are co-extensive notions. This metaphy sical/theological framework is the basis of Descartes’ commitment to three interrelated notions: that genuine causes and effects occur simultaneously; that causing is appropriately the case only when the cause is acting; and the view that God is the efficient, total, and continuous cause of everything that exists and every action that occurs. So from the vertical perspective, things are nothing without God’s continuous creation, and there is a problem in articulating how they are said to have independent being and causal efficacy. It is in terms of these commitments that Descartes’ views on horizontal, or material, causation must be approached. We will make apparent the radical extent to which his account of intra-worldly causation abandons his earlier and more traditional views about material causation. To this end we discuss Desca rtes’ jou rney to his mature position by emphasizing the gr owing epistemic limitations of his philosophy, which culminate in wh at we call his epistemic stance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argumenta Philosophica\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argumenta Philosophica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumenta Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了笛卡儿是如何形成其成熟的物质因果观的。随着时间的推移,笛卡尔的立场发生了一些非常激进的变化。最后一节阐述了他关于因果关系如何在物质世界中起作用的最终立场。在考虑笛卡尔的因果理论时,区分“垂直”和“水平”因果关系是有用的。从垂直的角度来看,上帝与受造界的关系。上帝是本质的存在,除上帝以外的一切存在都依赖于上帝才能存在和继续存在。因此,从垂直的角度来看,创造的行为和存在的事实是共同的概念。这种形而上学/神学框架是笛卡尔对三个相互关联的概念的承诺的基础:真正的原因和结果同时发生;只有当原因是行为时,导致才是恰当的;以及认为上帝是一切存在的事物和发生的每一个行为的有效的、全面的和连续的原因的观点。所以从垂直的角度来看,没有上帝的持续创造,事物就什么都不是,在如何阐明它们是独立存在和因果效力方面存在一个问题。笛卡尔关于水平或物质因果关系的观点必须从这些行为出发。我们将清楚地看到,他对世界内部因果关系的解释在多大程度上抛弃了他早期和更传统的关于物质因果关系的观点。为此,我们通过强调笛卡尔哲学日益增长的认知局限性来讨论笛卡尔走向成熟立场的过程,这些局限性最终形成了我们所说的他的认知立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowing causes: Descartes on the world of matter
In this essay, we discuss how Descartes arrive s a t his mature vi ew of material caus ation. Descartes’ position changes over time in some very radical ways. The last section spells out his final position as to how causation works in the world of material objects. When considering Descartes’ causal theories, it is useful to distinguish between ‘vertical’ and ‘horizontal’ causation. The vertical perspective addresses God’s relation to creation. God is essential being, and every being other than God depends upon God in order to exist and to continue in existence .Thus, from the vertical perspective, the act of creating and fact of coming into existence are co-extensive notions. This metaphy sical/theological framework is the basis of Descartes’ commitment to three interrelated notions: that genuine causes and effects occur simultaneously; that causing is appropriately the case only when the cause is acting; and the view that God is the efficient, total, and continuous cause of everything that exists and every action that occurs. So from the vertical perspective, things are nothing without God’s continuous creation, and there is a problem in articulating how they are said to have independent being and causal efficacy. It is in terms of these commitments that Descartes’ views on horizontal, or material, causation must be approached. We will make apparent the radical extent to which his account of intra-worldly causation abandons his earlier and more traditional views about material causation. To this end we discuss Desca rtes’ jou rney to his mature position by emphasizing the gr owing epistemic limitations of his philosophy, which culminate in wh at we call his epistemic stance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Argumenta Philosophica
Argumenta Philosophica Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Naturalisme et scepticisme Naturalismo e cosmopolitismo nell’Antichità Il naturalismo oggi Onnipotenza divina e ordine naturale nel Medioevo La natura e gli stati abituali nell’Etica Nicomachea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1