抗议浪潮还是抗议高峰?

Q2 Social Sciences Contention Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.3167/cont.2018.060203
M. Schoene
{"title":"抗议浪潮还是抗议高峰?","authors":"M. Schoene","doi":"10.3167/cont.2018.060203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent scholarly attention has designated European protest\nactivity from 2011 to 2013 a “protest wave,” a term with specific\nsociological meaning. While many European countries indeed\nexperienced a period of unrest, I argue that for protest activity to\nbe considered a wave, the protest in question must be significantly\nhigher than normative levels of participation. To this end, I conceptualize\nnational protest culture as an explanatory factor for recent\nprotest activity. Using the European Social Survey, a series of multilevel\nmixed effects regression models for 22 countries demonstrates\nthat the most powerful predictor of protest in 2012 is the protest\nrate for each country in 2008. I therefore question this period’s\ndesignation as a protest wave and instead choose to refer to it as a\nset of discrete protest spikes.","PeriodicalId":36466,"journal":{"name":"Contention","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protest Wave or Protest Spike?\",\"authors\":\"M. Schoene\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/cont.2018.060203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent scholarly attention has designated European protest\\nactivity from 2011 to 2013 a “protest wave,” a term with specific\\nsociological meaning. While many European countries indeed\\nexperienced a period of unrest, I argue that for protest activity to\\nbe considered a wave, the protest in question must be significantly\\nhigher than normative levels of participation. To this end, I conceptualize\\nnational protest culture as an explanatory factor for recent\\nprotest activity. Using the European Social Survey, a series of multilevel\\nmixed effects regression models for 22 countries demonstrates\\nthat the most powerful predictor of protest in 2012 is the protest\\nrate for each country in 2008. I therefore question this period’s\\ndesignation as a protest wave and instead choose to refer to it as a\\nset of discrete protest spikes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contention\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/cont.2018.060203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/cont.2018.060203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的学术关注将2011年至2013年的欧洲抗议活动称为“抗议浪潮”,这是一个具有特定社会学含义的术语。虽然许多欧洲国家确实经历了一段动荡时期,但我认为,要将抗议活动视为一波浪潮,所涉及的抗议活动必须明显高于规范的参与水平。为此,我将民族抗议文化概念化,作为最近抗议活动的一个解释因素。利用欧洲社会调查,对22个国家的一系列多层次混合效应回归模型表明,2012年抗议活动最有力的预测指标是2008年每个国家的抗议活动。因此,我质疑这段时期被称为抗议浪潮的说法,而是选择将其称为一系列离散的抗议高峰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protest Wave or Protest Spike?
Recent scholarly attention has designated European protest activity from 2011 to 2013 a “protest wave,” a term with specific sociological meaning. While many European countries indeed experienced a period of unrest, I argue that for protest activity to be considered a wave, the protest in question must be significantly higher than normative levels of participation. To this end, I conceptualize national protest culture as an explanatory factor for recent protest activity. Using the European Social Survey, a series of multilevel mixed effects regression models for 22 countries demonstrates that the most powerful predictor of protest in 2012 is the protest rate for each country in 2008. I therefore question this period’s designation as a protest wave and instead choose to refer to it as a set of discrete protest spikes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contention
Contention Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
On Violence, Race, and Social Theory A Checkerboard of Ethnoracial Violence The Political Economy of Learning in Agrarian Contention Goals, Strategies, and Tactics Peaceful or Disciplined?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1