将公平考虑纳入基于主体的建模:一个概念框架和实践指导

T. Williams, Daniel G. Brown, S. Guikema, T. Logan, N. Magliocca, Birgit Müller, C. Steger
{"title":"将公平考虑纳入基于主体的建模:一个概念框架和实践指导","authors":"T. Williams, Daniel G. Brown, S. Guikema, T. Logan, N. Magliocca, Birgit Müller, C. Steger","doi":"10.18564/jasss.4816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Advancing equity is a complex challenge for society, science, and policy. Agent-based models are increasingly used as scientific tools to advance understanding of systems, inform decision-making, and share knowledge. Yet, equity has not received due attention within the agent-based modeling (ABM) literature. In this paper, wedevelopaconceptualframeworkandprovideguidanceforintegratingequityconsiderationsintoABM researchandmodelingpractice. TheframeworkconceptualizesABMasinterfacingwithequityoutcomesattwo levels(thescience-societyinterfaceandwithinthemodelitself)andthemodelerasa filter and lens thatprojects knowledge between the target system and the model. Within the framework, we outline three complementary, equity-advancing action pathways: (1) engage stakeholders, (2) acknowledge positionality and bias, and (3) assessequitywithagent-basedmodels. ForPathway1,wesummarizeexistingguidancewithintheparticipatory modeling literature. For Pathway 2, we introduce the positionality and bias document as a tool to promote modeler and stakeholder reflexivity throughout the modeling process. For Pathway 3, we synthesize a typology of approaches for modeling equity and offer a set of preliminary suggestions for best practice. By engaging with these action pathways, modelers both reduce the risks of inadvertently perpetuating inequity and harness the opportunities for ABM to play a larger role in creating a more equitable future.","PeriodicalId":14675,"journal":{"name":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Equity Considerations into Agent-Based Modeling: A Conceptual Framework and Practical Guidance\",\"authors\":\"T. Williams, Daniel G. Brown, S. Guikema, T. Logan, N. Magliocca, Birgit Müller, C. Steger\",\"doi\":\"10.18564/jasss.4816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Advancing equity is a complex challenge for society, science, and policy. Agent-based models are increasingly used as scientific tools to advance understanding of systems, inform decision-making, and share knowledge. Yet, equity has not received due attention within the agent-based modeling (ABM) literature. In this paper, wedevelopaconceptualframeworkandprovideguidanceforintegratingequityconsiderationsintoABM researchandmodelingpractice. TheframeworkconceptualizesABMasinterfacingwithequityoutcomesattwo levels(thescience-societyinterfaceandwithinthemodelitself)andthemodelerasa filter and lens thatprojects knowledge between the target system and the model. Within the framework, we outline three complementary, equity-advancing action pathways: (1) engage stakeholders, (2) acknowledge positionality and bias, and (3) assessequitywithagent-basedmodels. ForPathway1,wesummarizeexistingguidancewithintheparticipatory modeling literature. For Pathway 2, we introduce the positionality and bias document as a tool to promote modeler and stakeholder reflexivity throughout the modeling process. For Pathway 3, we synthesize a typology of approaches for modeling equity and offer a set of preliminary suggestions for best practice. By engaging with these action pathways, modelers both reduce the risks of inadvertently perpetuating inequity and harness the opportunities for ABM to play a larger role in creating a more equitable future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

促进公平对社会、科学和政策都是一项复杂的挑战。基于主体的模型越来越多地被用作科学工具,以促进对系统的理解,为决策提供信息,并共享知识。然而,在基于主体的建模(ABM)文献中,公平性并没有得到应有的重视。本文构建了一个概念框架,为将公平考虑纳入abm研究和建模实践提供了指导。该框架概念化了两个层次(科学-社会接口和模型本身)的质量结果,而模型则是在目标系统和模型之间投射知识的过滤器和透镜。在该框架内,我们概述了三个互补的、促进公平的行动途径:(1)吸引利益相关者;(2)承认立场和偏见;(3)使用基于代理的模型进行评估。对于pathway1,我们总结了参与式建模文献中的现有指导。对于路径2,我们引入了位置性和偏见文档,作为在整个建模过程中促进建模者和利益相关者反身性的工具。对于途径3,我们综合了公平建模方法的类型,并为最佳实践提供了一组初步建议。通过参与这些行动途径,建模者既降低了无意中延续不平等的风险,又利用了ABM在创造更公平的未来方面发挥更大作用的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating Equity Considerations into Agent-Based Modeling: A Conceptual Framework and Practical Guidance
: Advancing equity is a complex challenge for society, science, and policy. Agent-based models are increasingly used as scientific tools to advance understanding of systems, inform decision-making, and share knowledge. Yet, equity has not received due attention within the agent-based modeling (ABM) literature. In this paper, wedevelopaconceptualframeworkandprovideguidanceforintegratingequityconsiderationsintoABM researchandmodelingpractice. TheframeworkconceptualizesABMasinterfacingwithequityoutcomesattwo levels(thescience-societyinterfaceandwithinthemodelitself)andthemodelerasa filter and lens thatprojects knowledge between the target system and the model. Within the framework, we outline three complementary, equity-advancing action pathways: (1) engage stakeholders, (2) acknowledge positionality and bias, and (3) assessequitywithagent-basedmodels. ForPathway1,wesummarizeexistingguidancewithintheparticipatory modeling literature. For Pathway 2, we introduce the positionality and bias document as a tool to promote modeler and stakeholder reflexivity throughout the modeling process. For Pathway 3, we synthesize a typology of approaches for modeling equity and offer a set of preliminary suggestions for best practice. By engaging with these action pathways, modelers both reduce the risks of inadvertently perpetuating inequity and harness the opportunities for ABM to play a larger role in creating a more equitable future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conflicting Information and Compliance with COVID-19 Behavioral Recommendations Particle Swarm Optimization for Calibration in Spatially Explicit Agent-Based Modeling The Role of Reinforcement Learning in the Emergence of Conventions: Simulation Experiments with the Repeated Volunteer's Dilemma Generation of Synthetic Populations in Social Simulations: A Review of Methods and Practices An Integrated Ecological-Social Simulation Model of Farmer Decisions and Cropping System Performance in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1