云、牛犊和大炮:对战争与和平的生态解读

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Interdisciplinary Literary Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0099
Ian E. J. Hill
{"title":"云、牛犊和大炮:对战争与和平的生态解读","authors":"Ian E. J. Hill","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article engages in an ecocritical-spatial reading of Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace focused on the narrator’s conscientious and equitable treatment of nature and animals. Where traditional historical-temporal readings tend to break the book into constituent elements, typically emphasizing Tolstoy’s historiography, this article offers a synthetic reading made possible by an often-overlooked ecological through-line. The author argues that the narrator formulates the biosphere, not just humans, as his object of interest and defines war as a result of humans acting unnaturally and failing to think ecologically. The author also employs close readings to show that war and nature emerge simultaneously in War and Peace and appear intentionally fused throughout, and that the book locates the practicability of war in soldiers subordinating each other as animals, which they deem inferior. The article concludes that the narrator’s thoughtful depiction of nature and sympathy for animals are core to the book’s rhetoric and form. To overlook these features is to overlook War and Peace.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":"60 1","pages":"123 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cloud, Calf, and Cannon: An Ecological Reading of War and Peace\",\"authors\":\"Ian E. J. Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This article engages in an ecocritical-spatial reading of Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace focused on the narrator’s conscientious and equitable treatment of nature and animals. Where traditional historical-temporal readings tend to break the book into constituent elements, typically emphasizing Tolstoy’s historiography, this article offers a synthetic reading made possible by an often-overlooked ecological through-line. The author argues that the narrator formulates the biosphere, not just humans, as his object of interest and defines war as a result of humans acting unnaturally and failing to think ecologically. The author also employs close readings to show that war and nature emerge simultaneously in War and Peace and appear intentionally fused throughout, and that the book locates the practicability of war in soldiers subordinating each other as animals, which they deem inferior. The article concludes that the narrator’s thoughtful depiction of nature and sympathy for animals are core to the book’s rhetoric and form. To overlook these features is to overlook War and Peace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对列夫·托尔斯泰的《战争与和平》进行了生态批判的空间解读,重点关注叙述者对自然和动物的良心和公平对待。传统的历史时间阅读倾向于将书分解成组成部分,通常强调托尔斯泰的历史编纂,而本文提供了一种综合的阅读方式,通过经常被忽视的生态贯穿线来实现。作者认为,叙述者将生物圈而不仅仅是人类作为他的兴趣对象,并将战争定义为人类不自然行为和未能从生态角度思考的结果。作者还通过细读来证明,战争与自然在《战争与和平》中同时出现,并有意地贯穿始终,这本书将战争的实用性定位于士兵们把彼此当作动物一样从属,他们认为动物是劣等的。文章的结论是,叙述者对自然的深思熟虑的描述和对动物的同情是这本书的修辞和形式的核心。忽视这些特征就是忽视了《战争与和平》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cloud, Calf, and Cannon: An Ecological Reading of War and Peace
abstract:This article engages in an ecocritical-spatial reading of Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace focused on the narrator’s conscientious and equitable treatment of nature and animals. Where traditional historical-temporal readings tend to break the book into constituent elements, typically emphasizing Tolstoy’s historiography, this article offers a synthetic reading made possible by an often-overlooked ecological through-line. The author argues that the narrator formulates the biosphere, not just humans, as his object of interest and defines war as a result of humans acting unnaturally and failing to think ecologically. The author also employs close readings to show that war and nature emerge simultaneously in War and Peace and appear intentionally fused throughout, and that the book locates the practicability of war in soldiers subordinating each other as animals, which they deem inferior. The article concludes that the narrator’s thoughtful depiction of nature and sympathy for animals are core to the book’s rhetoric and form. To overlook these features is to overlook War and Peace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.
期刊最新文献
Negotiating Demons of the Mind: Psychological Distress, Social Apathy and Victimhood in Tagore’s The Garden (Malancha) Discourse and Madness in Shadows in the Sun The Weather Is Dirty: Jane Austen’s Use of Nature as a Social Agent Women’s Dilemma of Love: An Ethical Literary Interpretation of Miss Sophie’s Diary by Ding Ling Improvisation in Jack Kerouac’s “Jazz” Writing: Intersubjectivity, Authenticity, and the Collectivist Utopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1