{"title":"云、牛犊和大炮:对战争与和平的生态解读","authors":"Ian E. J. Hill","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article engages in an ecocritical-spatial reading of Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace focused on the narrator’s conscientious and equitable treatment of nature and animals. Where traditional historical-temporal readings tend to break the book into constituent elements, typically emphasizing Tolstoy’s historiography, this article offers a synthetic reading made possible by an often-overlooked ecological through-line. The author argues that the narrator formulates the biosphere, not just humans, as his object of interest and defines war as a result of humans acting unnaturally and failing to think ecologically. The author also employs close readings to show that war and nature emerge simultaneously in War and Peace and appear intentionally fused throughout, and that the book locates the practicability of war in soldiers subordinating each other as animals, which they deem inferior. The article concludes that the narrator’s thoughtful depiction of nature and sympathy for animals are core to the book’s rhetoric and form. To overlook these features is to overlook War and Peace.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":"60 1","pages":"123 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cloud, Calf, and Cannon: An Ecological Reading of War and Peace\",\"authors\":\"Ian E. J. Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This article engages in an ecocritical-spatial reading of Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace focused on the narrator’s conscientious and equitable treatment of nature and animals. Where traditional historical-temporal readings tend to break the book into constituent elements, typically emphasizing Tolstoy’s historiography, this article offers a synthetic reading made possible by an often-overlooked ecological through-line. The author argues that the narrator formulates the biosphere, not just humans, as his object of interest and defines war as a result of humans acting unnaturally and failing to think ecologically. The author also employs close readings to show that war and nature emerge simultaneously in War and Peace and appear intentionally fused throughout, and that the book locates the practicability of war in soldiers subordinating each other as animals, which they deem inferior. The article concludes that the narrator’s thoughtful depiction of nature and sympathy for animals are core to the book’s rhetoric and form. To overlook these features is to overlook War and Peace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cloud, Calf, and Cannon: An Ecological Reading of War and Peace
abstract:This article engages in an ecocritical-spatial reading of Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace focused on the narrator’s conscientious and equitable treatment of nature and animals. Where traditional historical-temporal readings tend to break the book into constituent elements, typically emphasizing Tolstoy’s historiography, this article offers a synthetic reading made possible by an often-overlooked ecological through-line. The author argues that the narrator formulates the biosphere, not just humans, as his object of interest and defines war as a result of humans acting unnaturally and failing to think ecologically. The author also employs close readings to show that war and nature emerge simultaneously in War and Peace and appear intentionally fused throughout, and that the book locates the practicability of war in soldiers subordinating each other as animals, which they deem inferior. The article concludes that the narrator’s thoughtful depiction of nature and sympathy for animals are core to the book’s rhetoric and form. To overlook these features is to overlook War and Peace.
期刊介绍:
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.