P27为儿童和青少年的学习困难设定研究重点

R. Wood, A. Keow Lim, S. Rhodes, A. O'hare
{"title":"P27为儿童和青少年的学习困难设定研究重点","authors":"R. Wood, A. Keow Lim, S. Rhodes, A. O'hare","doi":"10.1136/JECH-2018-SSMABSTRACTS.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Our project aims to identify the top 10 research priorities for learning difficulties in children and young people (CYP). The project is a collaboration between Scottish charity The Salvesen Mindroom Centre (SMC), the SMC Research Centre within the University of Edinburgh, and the James Lind Alliance (JLA) (http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/priority-setting-partnerships/learning-difficulties-scotland/). The definition of learning difficulties that we are working to is ‘a problem of understanding or an emotional difficulty that affects a person’s ability to learn, get along with others, and follow convention’ (http://www.mindroom.org/index.php/about_us). Methods Following standard JLA methodology, we asked people from across Scotland who have learning difficulties, their families, and the professionals working alongside them, to tell us what they would want researchers to find out about learning difficulties using online and paper survey tools. Additional potential research priorities were gathered through review of NICE and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) research recommendations. After removing the out-of-scope submissions, the remaining submissions were allocated into categories. Duplicates were combined. Potential research priorities were then verified against up-to-date, relevant and reliable systematic reviews and guidelines to confirm ongoing uncertainty. Future work will include an interim survey to rank the priorities and a final stakeholder workshop to identify and rank the top 20 questions. Results The first survey was completed in 2017. We received 828 questions from 367 respondents, with 3% coming from CYP with learning difficulties, 5% adults who experienced learning difficulties as a child, 40% parents/carers, and 52% professionals. An innovative aspect of this project is the cross-sector input from education (37%), health (57%) and third sector (7%) professionals. Out of the 828 questions, 761 were classified as in-scope. The 761 questions were summarised into 40 questions under 9 themes. Respondents from 28 out of 32 Scottish local authorities participated in the survey. 32% of the CYP with learning difficulties and adults who experienced learning difficulties as a child, 8% of the parents and carers (postcode of residence), and 10% of the professionals (work postcode) were from the 20% Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation most deprived data zones in Scotland. Conclusion The James Lind Alliance methodology provided a systematic and transparent approach to identifying research priorities that included people who have learning difficulties, families, and professionals who have typically not contributed to setting the research agenda. The top 10 research priorities will inform future research work into learning difficulties, including the work of the SMC Research Centre.","PeriodicalId":15778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"A73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P27 Setting research priorities for learning difficulties in children and young people\",\"authors\":\"R. Wood, A. Keow Lim, S. Rhodes, A. O'hare\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/JECH-2018-SSMABSTRACTS.153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Our project aims to identify the top 10 research priorities for learning difficulties in children and young people (CYP). The project is a collaboration between Scottish charity The Salvesen Mindroom Centre (SMC), the SMC Research Centre within the University of Edinburgh, and the James Lind Alliance (JLA) (http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/priority-setting-partnerships/learning-difficulties-scotland/). The definition of learning difficulties that we are working to is ‘a problem of understanding or an emotional difficulty that affects a person’s ability to learn, get along with others, and follow convention’ (http://www.mindroom.org/index.php/about_us). Methods Following standard JLA methodology, we asked people from across Scotland who have learning difficulties, their families, and the professionals working alongside them, to tell us what they would want researchers to find out about learning difficulties using online and paper survey tools. Additional potential research priorities were gathered through review of NICE and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) research recommendations. After removing the out-of-scope submissions, the remaining submissions were allocated into categories. Duplicates were combined. Potential research priorities were then verified against up-to-date, relevant and reliable systematic reviews and guidelines to confirm ongoing uncertainty. Future work will include an interim survey to rank the priorities and a final stakeholder workshop to identify and rank the top 20 questions. Results The first survey was completed in 2017. We received 828 questions from 367 respondents, with 3% coming from CYP with learning difficulties, 5% adults who experienced learning difficulties as a child, 40% parents/carers, and 52% professionals. An innovative aspect of this project is the cross-sector input from education (37%), health (57%) and third sector (7%) professionals. Out of the 828 questions, 761 were classified as in-scope. The 761 questions were summarised into 40 questions under 9 themes. Respondents from 28 out of 32 Scottish local authorities participated in the survey. 32% of the CYP with learning difficulties and adults who experienced learning difficulties as a child, 8% of the parents and carers (postcode of residence), and 10% of the professionals (work postcode) were from the 20% Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation most deprived data zones in Scotland. Conclusion The James Lind Alliance methodology provided a systematic and transparent approach to identifying research priorities that included people who have learning difficulties, families, and professionals who have typically not contributed to setting the research agenda. The top 10 research priorities will inform future research work into learning difficulties, including the work of the SMC Research Centre.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"A73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH-2018-SSMABSTRACTS.153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH-2018-SSMABSTRACTS.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本项目旨在确定儿童和青少年学习困难(CYP)的十大研究重点。该项目是苏格兰慈善机构Salvesen Mindroom中心(SMC)、爱丁堡大学SMC研究中心和詹姆斯林德联盟(JLA) (http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/priority-setting-partnerships/learning-difficulties-scotland/)之间的合作项目。我们正在研究的学习困难的定义是“一种影响一个人学习、与他人相处和遵循惯例的能力的理解问题或情感困难”(http://www.mindroom.org/index.php/about_us)。方法遵循标准的JLA方法,我们询问了来自苏格兰各地有学习困难的人,他们的家人,以及与他们一起工作的专业人员,告诉我们他们希望研究人员使用在线和纸质调查工具了解关于学习困难的什么。通过审查NICE和苏格兰校际指南网络(SIGN)的研究建议,收集了其他潜在的研究重点。在删除超出范围的提交后,将剩余的提交分配到类别中。重复项被合并。然后根据最新的、相关的和可靠的系统审查和指南验证潜在的研究重点,以确认持续的不确定性。未来的工作将包括一项临时调查,对优先事项进行排序,并举行最后的利益攸关方研讨会,以确定最重要的20个问题并对其进行排序。第一次调查于2017年完成。我们收到了来自367名受访者的828个问题,其中3%来自有学习困难的青少年,5%来自小时候经历过学习困难的成年人,40%来自父母/照顾者,52%来自专业人士。该项目的一个创新方面是来自教育(37%)、卫生(57%)和第三部门(7%)专业人员的跨部门投入。在828个问题中,有761个被归类为“范围内”。761个问题总结为9个主题下的40个问题。苏格兰32个地方政府中有28个参与了调查。32%的有学习困难的青少年和小时候经历过学习困难的成年人,8%的父母和照顾者(居住地邮编),10%的专业人员(工作邮编)来自20%的苏格兰多重剥夺指数,这是苏格兰最贫困的数据区。詹姆斯·林德联盟的方法提供了一种系统和透明的方法来确定研究重点,包括有学习困难的人、家庭和通常没有参与制定研究议程的专业人员。前十大研究重点将为未来的研究工作提供有关学习困难的信息,包括SMC研究中心的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P27 Setting research priorities for learning difficulties in children and young people
Background Our project aims to identify the top 10 research priorities for learning difficulties in children and young people (CYP). The project is a collaboration between Scottish charity The Salvesen Mindroom Centre (SMC), the SMC Research Centre within the University of Edinburgh, and the James Lind Alliance (JLA) (http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/priority-setting-partnerships/learning-difficulties-scotland/). The definition of learning difficulties that we are working to is ‘a problem of understanding or an emotional difficulty that affects a person’s ability to learn, get along with others, and follow convention’ (http://www.mindroom.org/index.php/about_us). Methods Following standard JLA methodology, we asked people from across Scotland who have learning difficulties, their families, and the professionals working alongside them, to tell us what they would want researchers to find out about learning difficulties using online and paper survey tools. Additional potential research priorities were gathered through review of NICE and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) research recommendations. After removing the out-of-scope submissions, the remaining submissions were allocated into categories. Duplicates were combined. Potential research priorities were then verified against up-to-date, relevant and reliable systematic reviews and guidelines to confirm ongoing uncertainty. Future work will include an interim survey to rank the priorities and a final stakeholder workshop to identify and rank the top 20 questions. Results The first survey was completed in 2017. We received 828 questions from 367 respondents, with 3% coming from CYP with learning difficulties, 5% adults who experienced learning difficulties as a child, 40% parents/carers, and 52% professionals. An innovative aspect of this project is the cross-sector input from education (37%), health (57%) and third sector (7%) professionals. Out of the 828 questions, 761 were classified as in-scope. The 761 questions were summarised into 40 questions under 9 themes. Respondents from 28 out of 32 Scottish local authorities participated in the survey. 32% of the CYP with learning difficulties and adults who experienced learning difficulties as a child, 8% of the parents and carers (postcode of residence), and 10% of the professionals (work postcode) were from the 20% Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation most deprived data zones in Scotland. Conclusion The James Lind Alliance methodology provided a systematic and transparent approach to identifying research priorities that included people who have learning difficulties, families, and professionals who have typically not contributed to setting the research agenda. The top 10 research priorities will inform future research work into learning difficulties, including the work of the SMC Research Centre.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early adulthood socioeconomic trajectories contribute to inequalities in adult diet quality, independent of childhood and adulthood socioeconomic position Education-related inequalities in disability during the last years of life: a full population register-based study Impact of increasing workforce racial diversity on black-white disparities in cardiovascular disease mortality Gender-specific aspects of socialisation and risk of cardiovascular disease among community-dwelling older adults: a prospective cohort study using machine learning algorithms and a conventional method Poverty trajectories and child and mother well-being outcomes in Ireland: findings from an Irish prospective cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1