在主观视频质量实验中融入日常生活情境

W. V. D. Broeck, An Jacobs, N. Staelens
{"title":"在主观视频质量实验中融入日常生活情境","authors":"W. V. D. Broeck, An Jacobs, N. Staelens","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Controlled subjective quality experiments are a well-known method to make decisions on the improvement of Quality of Service (QoS) of video streams. Recently it became clear that from a point of view of the consumer or user, the Quality of Experience (QoE) is more relevant and can influence the optimal QoS as determined in a lab-setting. The measurement of QoS parameters in a lab-setting does not take into account the specific context of the practice that is under examination (e,g. watching video content). In this paper we discuss a method of contextualized subjective quality experiments as we applied in different research projects in complement to the standardized lab-experiments. The strength of this method is that video and audio quality is assessed in the real-life context of the user, i.e. his or her natural habitat in which the behavior or practice normally takes place. We provide an overview of how we applied the contextualized research approach in two cases. Next we discuss the method's strengths and weaknesses and suggest a refinement of the methodology.","PeriodicalId":6303,"journal":{"name":"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","volume":"4 1","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating the everyday-life context in subjective video quality experiments\",\"authors\":\"W. V. D. Broeck, An Jacobs, N. Staelens\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Controlled subjective quality experiments are a well-known method to make decisions on the improvement of Quality of Service (QoS) of video streams. Recently it became clear that from a point of view of the consumer or user, the Quality of Experience (QoE) is more relevant and can influence the optimal QoS as determined in a lab-setting. The measurement of QoS parameters in a lab-setting does not take into account the specific context of the practice that is under examination (e,g. watching video content). In this paper we discuss a method of contextualized subjective quality experiments as we applied in different research projects in complement to the standardized lab-experiments. The strength of this method is that video and audio quality is assessed in the real-life context of the user, i.e. his or her natural habitat in which the behavior or practice normally takes place. We provide an overview of how we applied the contextualized research approach in two cases. Next we discuss the method's strengths and weaknesses and suggest a refinement of the methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"19-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

控制主观质量实验是一种众所周知的决定视频流服务质量(QoS)改进的方法。最近很明显,从消费者或用户的角度来看,体验质量(QoE)更相关,并且可以影响在实验室环境中确定的最佳QoS。在实验室环境中对QoS参数的测量没有考虑到正在检查的实践的具体背景(例如:观看视频内容)。在本文中,我们讨论了一种情境化主观质量实验的方法,并将其应用于不同的研究项目中,作为标准化实验室实验的补充。这种方法的优势在于,视频和音频质量是在用户的现实环境中评估的,即他或她的自然栖息地,在那里行为或实践通常发生。我们概述了我们如何在两个案例中应用情境化研究方法。接下来,我们将讨论该方法的优点和缺点,并建议改进该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating the everyday-life context in subjective video quality experiments
Controlled subjective quality experiments are a well-known method to make decisions on the improvement of Quality of Service (QoS) of video streams. Recently it became clear that from a point of view of the consumer or user, the Quality of Experience (QoE) is more relevant and can influence the optimal QoS as determined in a lab-setting. The measurement of QoS parameters in a lab-setting does not take into account the specific context of the practice that is under examination (e,g. watching video content). In this paper we discuss a method of contextualized subjective quality experiments as we applied in different research projects in complement to the standardized lab-experiments. The strength of this method is that video and audio quality is assessed in the real-life context of the user, i.e. his or her natural habitat in which the behavior or practice normally takes place. We provide an overview of how we applied the contextualized research approach in two cases. Next we discuss the method's strengths and weaknesses and suggest a refinement of the methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the effects of test clip quality distribution in HD video Quality-of-Experience studies No-reference bitstream-based impairment detection for high efficiency video coding A perceptual quality based rate distortion model Evaluation of visual privacy filters impact on video surveillance intelligibility Too tired for calling? A physiological measure of fatigue caused by bandwidth limitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1