George C. Banks , Haley M. Woznyj , Claire A. Mansfield
{"title":"组织行为学中的 \"行为 \"在哪里?呼吁领导力研究及其他领域的革命","authors":"George C. Banks , Haley M. Woznyj , Claire A. Mansfield","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Behaviors can be characterized as “the internally coordinated responses (actions or inactions) of whole living organisms (individuals or groups) to internal and/or external stimuli.” (Levitis et al., 2009). The study of behavior is a critical component of theory advancement in the area of leadership. Yet, a large number of leadership studies conflate behavioral and nonbehavioral concepts. First, our manuscript offers a theoretical discussion of why the absence of research on behavior is a growing concern for the advancement of theory in leadership. Evidence from a systematic review (k = 214) indicates that of 2338 variables only 3% are behavioral in nature (19% of studies include at least one behavioral measure). Second, we present a framework of behavior to better distinguish leader (follower) behaviors from other concepts. Finally, we provide a set of methodological recommendations to ensure alignment between theoretical conceptualizations and methodological choices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"34 6","pages":"Article 101581"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where is “behavior” in organizational behavior? A call for a revolution in leadership research and beyond\",\"authors\":\"George C. Banks , Haley M. Woznyj , Claire A. Mansfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Behaviors can be characterized as “the internally coordinated responses (actions or inactions) of whole living organisms (individuals or groups) to internal and/or external stimuli.” (Levitis et al., 2009). The study of behavior is a critical component of theory advancement in the area of leadership. Yet, a large number of leadership studies conflate behavioral and nonbehavioral concepts. First, our manuscript offers a theoretical discussion of why the absence of research on behavior is a growing concern for the advancement of theory in leadership. Evidence from a systematic review (k = 214) indicates that of 2338 variables only 3% are behavioral in nature (19% of studies include at least one behavioral measure). Second, we present a framework of behavior to better distinguish leader (follower) behaviors from other concepts. Finally, we provide a set of methodological recommendations to ensure alignment between theoretical conceptualizations and methodological choices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984321000862\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984321000862","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
摘要
行为可以被描述为“整个生物体(个体或群体)对内部和/或外部刺激的内部协调反应(行动或不作为)。”(Levitis et al., 2009)。行为研究是领导理论发展的重要组成部分。然而,大量的领导力研究混淆了行为和非行为的概念。首先,我们的手稿提供了一个理论讨论,为什么缺乏对行为的研究是一个日益关注的领导理论的进步。来自系统评价的证据(k = 214)表明,在2338个变量中,只有3%本质上是行为的(19%的研究至少包括一个行为测量)。其次,我们提出了一个行为框架,以便更好地将领导者(追随者)行为与其他概念区分开来。最后,我们提供了一套方法建议,以确保理论概念化和方法选择之间的一致性。
Where is “behavior” in organizational behavior? A call for a revolution in leadership research and beyond
Behaviors can be characterized as “the internally coordinated responses (actions or inactions) of whole living organisms (individuals or groups) to internal and/or external stimuli.” (Levitis et al., 2009). The study of behavior is a critical component of theory advancement in the area of leadership. Yet, a large number of leadership studies conflate behavioral and nonbehavioral concepts. First, our manuscript offers a theoretical discussion of why the absence of research on behavior is a growing concern for the advancement of theory in leadership. Evidence from a systematic review (k = 214) indicates that of 2338 variables only 3% are behavioral in nature (19% of studies include at least one behavioral measure). Second, we present a framework of behavior to better distinguish leader (follower) behaviors from other concepts. Finally, we provide a set of methodological recommendations to ensure alignment between theoretical conceptualizations and methodological choices.
期刊介绍:
The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications.
Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.